Skip to main content

Politics, Imagination and Everyday Life in Nadine Gordimer’s The Pickup

  • Chapter
Imagining Mass Dictatorships

Part of the book series: Mass Dictatorship in the 20th Century ((MASSD))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of mass dictatorship is a historical framework with which to analyse twentieth-century dictatorships from a transnational perspective; it challenges the developmental view of history by highlighting the fact that twentieth-century dictatorship regimes were part of a very modern project that found its roots in the nation-state, rather than a pre-modern political abnormality, and as such, they have been an inseparable part of the transnational formation of modernity. Furthermore, the concept of mass dictatorship aims at criticizing the antagonism of the past and present between, in most cases, national/cultural groupings around the world entrenched in the rigid dichotomy of ‘perpetrator vs. victim’. It also problematizes the simplistic understanding of power dynamics in the modern regime of the nation-state, and ultimately challenges the complacent stance towards the relationship between responsibility(-ies) and complicity(-ies). And there is more to it. This historical hypothesis tries to do something un-historical; it strongly urges us to ‘imagine’ in order to move beyond the closed dynamics between coercion (from above) and consent (from below). In other words, it puts a heavy emphasis on the role of imagination for us to think and act outside the ‘behemoth — a perfect tightly sutured political machine, which does not allow even a tiny space for dissent and resistance’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Jie-Hyun Lim, ‘Series Introduction: Mapping Mass Dictatorship — Towards a Transnational History of Twentieth-Century Dictatorship’, in Jie-Hyun Lim and Karen Petrone (eds) Gender Politcs and Mass Dictatorship: Global Perspectives (England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nadine Gordimer, ‘Living in Interregnum’ in Stephen Clingman (ed.) The Essential Gesture: Writing, Politics and Places (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1988), p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lars Engle, ‘The Political Uncanny: The Novels of Nadine Gordimer’, Yale Journal of Criticism 2.2 (1989), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nadine Gordimer, The Pickup (U.S.A: Penguin Books, 2001), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Attwell and Barbara Harlow, ‘Introduction: South African Fiction After Apartheid’, Modern Fiction Studies 46.1 (2000), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Afrikaner politicians and intellectuals employed a rhetoric of ‘race’ and ‘national identity’ that perhaps allows for (the least equivocal) analogies to be made between Afrikaner and Nazi Party ideology. Some scholars are more cautious about applying the fascist label to the National Party regime (1948–1994), but ‘the totalitarian character of NP hegemony and the obvious strength of racial ultranationalism among the politically dominant Afrikaners alone seem enough basis for a comparison’. See Susan Pearsall, ‘“Where the Banalities Are Enacted”: The Everyday in Gordimer’s Novels’, Research in African Literatures 31.1 (2000), p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Judie Newman, ‘Jump Starts: Nadine Gordimer after Apartheid’, in Nahem Yousaf (ed.) Apartheid Narratives (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2001), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Neil Lazarus, ‘The South African Ideology: The Myth of Exceptionalism, the Idea of Renaissance’, The South Atlantic Quarterly 103.4 (2004), p. 624.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See John Saul, ‘Cry for the Beloved Country: The Post-Apartheid Denouement’, Monthly Review 52.8 (January 2001), pp. 1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hein Marais, South Africa, Limits to Change: The Political Economy of Transformation (London: Zed, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zine Magubane, ‘The Revolution Betrayed? Globalization, Neoliberalism, and the Post-Apartheid State’, The South Atlantic Quarterly 103.4 (2004), pp. 657–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alan Nasser, ‘The Tendency to Privatize’, Monthly Review 54.10 (March 2003), pp. 22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeremy Cronin, ‘Post-Apartheid South Africa: A Reply to John S. Saul’, Monthly Review 54.7 (December 2002), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Other critics such as Caren Kaplan and Pheng Cheah also, although in different contexts, point to the ‘ordered totality’ of current political terrain because of the way power, operating on the level of everyday life in a global context, invalidates the structure of the security and defensive capacity of an interiority, thus the outside/inside binary as well. See Caren Kaplan, ‘Precision Target: GPS and the Militarization of U.S. Consumer Identity’, American Quarterly 58.3 (2006), pp. 693–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pheng Cheah, ‘Crises of Money’, Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 16.1 (2008), pp. 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michel Foucault, ‘What is Enlightenment?’ in Paul Rabinow (ed.) The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon, 1984), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marc Redfield, ‘Imagi-Nation: The Imagined Community and the Aesthetics of Mourning’, Diacritics 29.4 (1999), p. 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin Books, 2004), p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henry Lefebvre and Christine Levich, ‘The Everyday and Everydayness’, Yale French Studies 73 (1987), p. 7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Seonjoo Park

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Park, S. (2013). Politics, Imagination and Everyday Life in Nadine Gordimer’s The Pickup. In: Schoenhals, M., Sarsenov, K. (eds) Imagining Mass Dictatorships. Mass Dictatorship in the 20th Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137330697_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137330697_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46118-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33069-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics