Skip to main content

Teach For America: How a Teacher Corps Changes Schools and Community

  • Chapter
Philanthropy and Education

Abstract

Teach For America is a non-profit organisation that aims to eliminate disparities in educational outcome and to address teacher shortages by sending graduates from elite colleges, most of whom do not have a background in education, to teach in low-income rural and urban schools. Teach for America is a highly selective teacher certification programme, and describes itself as a national corps of top recent college graduates (85 per cent with bachelor degrees) of all academic majors who commit two years to teach in urban and rural public schools. In the 2010/11 school year, 8,200 Teach for America corps members taught 500,000 students in 2,500 schools in 100 of the lowest performing public school districts nationwide. Corps members receive seven weeks of training before they begin teaching, one week of study and observation, five weeks of summer institute, and another week of orientation to the schools and communities in which they will be teaching. In addition to their salary, Teach For America teachers receive an AmeriCorps grant from the US federal government, which helps with student loans and funding for future education expenses. Since 1990 Teach for America has included 28,000 corps members; it is now the largest provider of teachers for low-income communities and has affected the lives of more than three million students. Because Teach For America engages future leaders in education in low-income communities, the organisation works on expanding the force of leaders who work from inside and outside the education system to improve academic outcomes for children in those communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Americorps (2011): History, Legislation, and Budget. [Online] Available at: http://www.americorps.gov/about/ac/history.asp, last retrieved 4 August 2011.

  • Antonucci, M. (2012): No evidence Teach For America busts unions. [Online] Available at: http://www.eiaonline.com/intercepts/2012/07/01/nea-no-evidence-teach-for-america-busts-unions, last retrieved 1 November 2012.

  • Appleman, D. (2009): Counterpoint: Why I oppose Teach For America. StarTribune, 29 June 2009. [Online] Available At: http://www.startribune.com/opinion/49234672. html, last retrieved 4 August 2011.

  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S. and Wyckoff, J. (2006): How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. In: Education Finance and Policy 1(2), 176–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Ronfeldt, M. and Wyckoff, J. (2009): Recruiting Effective Math Teachers. How Do Math Immersion Teachers Compare? Evidence from New York City. University at Albany, Stanford University, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009): Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010–11 Ed. Teachers — Kindergarten, Elementary, Middle, and Secondary. [Online] Available at http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos318.htm, last retrieved 1 August 2011.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J. and Heilig, J. V. (2005): Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach For America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, P.T., Mayer, D.P. and Glazerman, S. (2004): The Effects of Teach For America on Students. Princeton, New Jersey: Mathematica Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees,. G. (1998): The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilion, S. (2008): The New Team: Linda Darling-Hammond. THE NEW YORK TIMES, 12 February 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie, W. (2011): Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement. Evidence from Teach For America. [Online] Available at: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek /teacher-beat/teachercharacteristicsjuly2011.pdf, last retrieved 1 November 2012.

  • Donaldson, M.L. and Johnson, S.M. (2010): The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach For America teacher’s exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32(2), 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, K. (2010): Teach For America Dropouts. Campus Progress. [Online] Available at: http://campusprogress.org/articles/teach_for_america_dropouts, last retrieved 3 August 2011.

  • Farr, S. (2010): Teaching as Leadership. The Highly Effective Teacher’s Guide to Closing the Achievement Gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. (2008): Alternative Certification of Teachers. Boulder & Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado; Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F. and Rivkin, S. (2004): Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2) Spring 2004, pp. 326–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilig, J.V. and Jez, S.J. (2010): Teach For America: A Review of Evidence. The Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice, California State University, Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, G. and Thompson, C. (2010): Impacts of Teacher Preparation on Student Test Scores in North Carolina: Teacher Portals. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Institute for Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M., Hess, R., Wiener, J. and Robison, W. (2011): Teach For America Alumni Project. Education Next. Summer 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffington Post (2011): Walton Family Foundation gifts Teach For America $49.5 Million, 27 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussar, W.J. and Bailey, T.M. (2009): Projections of Education Statistics to 2018 (NCES 2009-062). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2001): Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American educational research journal, 38(3), pp. 499–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2002): The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP bulletin, 86(631), pp. 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T.J., Rockoff, J.E. and Staiger, D.O. (2006): What Does Certification Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. National Bureau of Economic Research, 12155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, S.N., Berends, M. and Naftel, S. (1999): Supply and demand of minority teachers in Texas: Problems and prospects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), pp. 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, W. (2003): The Unlikely Triumph of Teach For America and What I Learned Along The Way. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, W. (2011): A Chance to Make History: What Works and What Doesn’t in Providing an Excellent Education for All. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. (2010): Teach For America and Teacher Ed: Heads They Win, Tails We Lose. Journal of Teacher Education 61(1-2), 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczko-Kerr, I. and Berliner, D. C. (2002): The effectiveness of “Teach For America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luekens, M. T., Lyter, D. M. and Fox, E. E. (2004): Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the teacher followup survey, 2000–01 (NCES 2004-301). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. and Brandt, C. (2009): Assessing the Long-term Effects of Youth Service: The Puzzling Case of Teach of America. Social Forces 88(2), December 2009, 945–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, B. (2010): Looking Past the Spin: Teach For America. Rethinking Schools Online, 24(3). [Online] Available at: http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/24_03/24_03_TEACH FOR AMERICA.shtml, last retrieved 31 July 2011.

  • Noell, G.H. and Gansle, K.A. (2009): Teach For America Teacher’s Contributions to Student Achievement in Louisiana in Grades 4–9: 2004–05 to 2006–07. Division of Planning, Analysis, and Information Resources of the Louisiana Department of Education. Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy Studies Associates, Inc. (2009): Teach For America National Principal Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (2010): Teach For America and Civic Engagement. [Online] Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/group/reichresearch/cgi-bin/site/2010/01/03/ teach-for-america-and-civic-engagement, last retrieved 19 July 2011.

  • Riley, N.S. (2010): What They’re Doing After Harvard. Teach For America now attracts 12 per cent of all Ivy League seniors. The programme’s founder explains why it beats working on Wall Street. Wall Street Journal. [Online] Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704198004575311052522926796.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop, last retrieved 7 May 7 2012.

  • Sawchuk, S. (2009): Growth Model. Education Week, 29(3), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger, J.A., Dever, K.A. and Tingle, L. (2009): Evaluation of Teach For America in Charlotte-Mecklenbourg Schools. Charlotte-Mecklenbourg Schools: Center for Research & Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford University’s Entrepreneurship Corner (2011): Social Entrepreneurship Changing Education. [Online] Available at: http://ecorner.stanford.edu, last retrieved 5 August 2011.

  • State Board of Education (2010): Report Card on the Effectiveness of Teacher Training Programmes. Tennessee State Board of Education, Tennessee Higher Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasbourg, N. (2011): The average cost of a Masters Degree in Education. eHow, 23 April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America website. [Online] Available at: http://www.teachforamerica.org/, last retrieved 17 May 2013.

  • Teach For America (2005): 2005 Annual Report. We’re changing things.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2006): 2006 Annual Report. Priorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2007): 2007 Annual Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2008a): 2008 Annual Report. Priorities and Results.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2008b): Alumni Social Impact Report 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2009a): 2009 Annual Report. Priorities and Results.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2009b): Alumni Social Impact Report — 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2009c): National Principal Survey. Policy Studies Associates (July 2009). [Online] Available at: http://www.teachforamerica.org/assets/documents/2009_Principal_Survey_National_Results_Highlights_08_09.pdf, last retrieved 2 August 2011.

  • Teach For America (2010a): 2010 Annual Report. Priorities and Results.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2010b): The Role of Teach For America Alumni in Fueling the Movement to Eliminate Educational Inequity. Alumni Impact Report 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teach For America (2010c): Gains Handbook: Measuring Student Achievement and CM Effectiveness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppo, G. (2005): Study stirs teaching controversy. USA TODAY, 19 April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education (1997): Assessment of Student Performance. Studies of Education Reform. [Online] Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/SER/ASP/index.html, last retrieved 1 August 2011.

  • US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (2009): Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010–11 Ed., Teachers — Kindergarten, Elementary, Middle, and Secondary. [Online] Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos318.htm, last retrieved 17 May 2013.

  • Ware, A., LaTurner, R.J., Parsons, J., Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Garland, M. and Klopfenstein, K. (2011): Teacher Preparation Programmes and Teach For America Research Study. The University of Texas at Dallas. Education Research Center. January 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • What Works Clearinghouse (2008): WWC Quick Review of the Report “Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach For America in High School”. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse, US Dept. of Education. [Online] Available at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PDF/QuickReviews/Teach For America_071508.pdf, last retrieved 30 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Hannaway, J. and Taylor, C. (2008–09): Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach For America in High School. The Urban Institute/CALDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zill, N. (2008): Achievement Levels and Growth in D.C. Westat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Andreas Schröer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schröer, A. (2014). Teach For America: How a Teacher Corps Changes Schools and Community. In: Thümler, E., Bögelein, N., Beller, A., Anheier, H.K. (eds) Philanthropy and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326256_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics