Abstract
Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) is the most conspicuous of a variety of rhetorical events — speeches from the throne, formal debates, ministerial statements, select committee hearings, points of order, prayers — which collectively constitute the proceedings of the UK Parliament. Although PMQs is hardly typical of the way parliament conducts its business, it is parliament’s most familiar face — ‘the shop window of the House of Commons’, as Speaker John Bercow has put it (Bercow, 2010) — and in an important sense it has come to represent parliament in the public eye. Bercow’s concern for the reputation of the House has made him one of the most persistent and outspoken of PMQs’ many critics. ‘I ask right hon. and hon. Members on both sides of the Chamber, as I have done many times over the years, to give some thought to the way in which our proceedings are regarded by the people outside this House whose support we seek and whom we are here to represent’, he remarked after a particularly rowdy session in July 2013 (HC Deb [6 series], vol. 566, Part I, col. 391). Yet despite the low esteem in which it is generally held, PMQs excites more public interest and discussion than any other parliamentary event. It is an occasion when rhetorical performances are scrutinised and thought to matter, not for what they contribute to deliberation or policy making, but for what they reveal about the public characters of the party leaders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle (2007) On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, Trans. G. Kennedy, 2nd Edn (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Bates, R., Kerr, P., Byrne, C., and Stanley, L. (2012) ‘Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron’, Parliamentary Affairs, doi:10.1093/pa/gss044.
Bentham, J. (1983) Deontology Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article of Utilitarianism, A. Goldworth (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Bercow, J. (2010) ‘Speech to the Centre for Parliamentary Studies’, 6 July 2010, www.johnbercow.co.uk/06072010_cps_speech, date accessed 31 August 2013.
Blair, T. (2011) A Journey (London: Arrow Books).
Borthwick, R. (1979) ‘Questions and Debates’, in S.A. Walkland (ed.), The House of Commons in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 476–526.
Bull, P. and Wells, P. (2012) ‘Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(1), 30–48.
Burke, K. (1969) A Rhetoric of Motives (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Campbell, A. (2007) ‘Wit, Oratory — and Evasion. A Master Debater at Work’, The Observer, 27 June 2007.
Campbell, A. (2010) The Alastair Campbell Diaries Vol. 1 Prelude to Power 1994–97 (London: Hutchinson).
Campbell, A. (2011a) The Alastair Campbell Diaries Vol. 2 Power and the People 1997–1999 (London: Hutchinson).
Campbell, A. (2011b) The Alastair Campbell Diaries Vol. 3 Power and Responsibility 1999–2001 (London: Hutchinson).
Canning, G. (1991) The Letter-Journal of George Canning, 1793–1795, P. Jupp (ed.) (London: Royal Historical Society).
Chester, D.N. and Bowring, N. (1962) Questions in Parliament (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Coe, J. and Kelly, R. (2009) Prime Minister’s Questions (London: Library of the House of Commons).
Evans, L. (2010) ‘Bercow’s Screech’, The Spectator, 7 July 2010, blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2010/07/bercows-screech/date accessed 28 March 2014.
Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (eds) (1993) Parliamentary Questions (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Harris, S. (2001) ‘Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse’, Discourse & Society, 12, 451–472.
Jones, G.W. (1973) ‘The Prime Minister and Parliamentary Questions’, Parliamentary Affairs, 26, 260–273.
Lamont, N. (1999) In Office (London: Little, Brown).
Letts, Q. (2011) ‘“Flashman” Just Makes Cameron Sound More Sexy and Swaggering’, Daily Mail, 12 May 2011.
Mullin, C. (2010) Decline and Fall: Diaries 2005–2010 (London: Profile Books).
Seldon, A. (1997) John Major: A Political Life (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).
Seldon, A. and Lodge, G. (2010) Brown at 10 (London: Biteback).
Skinner, Q. (2007) ‘Paradiastole: Redescribing the Vices as Virtues’, in S. Adamson, G. Alexander, and K. Ettenhuber (eds), Renaissance Figures of Speech (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 149–163.
Slembrouck, S. (1992) ‘The Parliamentary Hansard “verbatim” Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse’, Language and Literature, 1(2), 101–119.
Wilson, J. (1990) Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language (London: Blackwell).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Christopher Reid
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reid, C. (2014). Rhetoric and Parliamentary Leadership — Prime Minister’s Questions. In: Atkins, J., Finlayson, A., Martin, J., Turnbull, N. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Rhetoric, Politics and Society Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325532_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45941-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32553-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)