Skip to main content
  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

Many brands in the maturity phase of the product life cycle (PLC) utilise a strategy to extend the life of a product by engaging minor product reformulations. These changes rarely affect basic attributes or the primary benefit being offered. This approach is simple to implement and involves minimal costs or risk. Hence the impact on sales tends to be relatively minor although the company can engage in making a promotional claim such as ‘new, improved’. This can be contrasted with entrepreneurial strategies where the result is the creation of a product or service which is very different from existing goods, capable of offering the customer a superior benefit promise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiman-Smith, L., Goodrich, N., Roberts, D. and Scinta, J. (2005), Assessing your organisation’s potential for value innovation, Research Technology Management, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaston, I. (2000), Entrepreneurial Marketing, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), The era of open innovation, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2007), Why companies should have open business models, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M. (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Harvard, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., Johnson, M.W. and Rigby, D.K. (2002), Foundations for growth how to identify and build disruptive new businesses, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarelli, G., O’Connor, M. and Ayers, A.D. (2005), Building a radical innovation competency, Research Technology Management, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1988), The influence of organisational structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 25, pp. 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, D.W., Piercy, N.F. and Low, G.S. (2002), The innovation challenges of proactive cannibalisation and discontinuous technology, European Business Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demuth, L.G. (2008), A viewpoint on disruptive innovation, Journal of the American Academy of Business, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, T.A., Lee, R.K. and Matheson, D. (2005), Value innovation: passport to value creation, Research Technology Management, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Sawy, O.M., Malhotra, A., Gosain, S. and Young, K.M. (1999), IT-intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: insights from Marshall Industries, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmquist, M., Fredberg, T. and Ollila, S. (2009), Exploring the field of open innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, E. (2008), Customer participation and trade-off between new product innovativeness and speed to market, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 72, pp. 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgelli, Y.P., Joyce, B. and Woods, A. (2000), Entrepreneurial action, innovation, and business performance: the small independent business, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, N. and Aiman-Smith, L. (2007), What does your most important customer want?, Research Technology Management, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, T., Wang, W.C., Yun, W., Tseng, C. and Lee, C. (2010), Managing technology transfer in open innovation: the case study in Taiwan, Modern Applied Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyrsky, K. (2000), Entrepreneurial metaphors and concepts: an exploratory study, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.C. and Mauborgne, R. (1999), Strategy, value innovation, and the knowledge economy, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R. and Pellegrini, L. (2010), Open innovation models adopted in practice: an extensive study in Italy, Business Excellence, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, B. and Sterling, J. (2009), Think disruptive! How to manage in a new era of innovation, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2009), Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences, R&D Management, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe, P. and Dominiquini, J. (2006), Overcoming the barriers to effective innovation, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap, J. and Katz, R. (2004), Anticipating disruptive innovation, Research Technology Management, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, J.A., Von Bergen, C.W. and Soper, B. (2005), Profiting from past triumphs and failures: harnessing history for future success, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2003), What strategic investments should you make during a recession to gain competitive advantage in the recovery? Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, N.T. and Vaidyanathan, G. (2009), Using a value creation compass to discover Blue Oceans, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowinski, F. and Sagal, M.W. (2010), Good practices in open innovation, Research Technology Management, September/October, pp. 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W.H., Watson, W.E., Garland, J.C. and Garland, J.W. (1998), A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners and corporate managers, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story, V., Hart, S. and O’Malley, L. (2009), Relational resources and competences for radical product innovation, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 25, No. 5/6, pp. 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, R. (2000), How to manage radical innovation, California Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Ian Chaston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaston, I. (2013). Innovation Strategies. In: Entrepreneurship and Innovation During Austerity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137324436_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics