Skip to main content

Global Conflicts

  • Chapter
New Age Globalization
  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

From the United Nations (UN) to the Commonwealth of Nations, resolving conflicts by peaceful means is one of the primary goals of international, intergovernmental political institutions, assuming that human development without peace and security is oxymoronic as is peace without relative degrees of social and economic security. Ironically and unfortunately, their inadequacy to help peaceful resolution of global conflicts comes in sharp focus with the fact that the twentieth century was the most violent of all previous centuries in terms of its lethality. Forty-five major wars were fought in that century. Approximately 90 million people, military and civilians, lost their lives in those wars. In comparison, WWI took 19 million lives; World War II killed 61 million, including 300,000+ Americans; the Korean War alone caused 3.6 million civilian and military deaths; the Vietnam War killed millions of Vietnamese and 58,000+ Americans; and the four-year (1984–87) Iraqi-Iranian war resulted in 1.5 million (estimated) casualties including hundreds of thousands deaths on each side.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michael Clodfelter, Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and other Figures (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yasmin Khan, The Great Partition: The Making of India and Pakistan (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), 128–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siddiq Salik, Witness to Surrender (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. LaPorte, “Pakistan in 1971: The Disintegration of a Nation,” Asian Survey 12, no. 2 (1972): 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinrich Harrer, Seven Years in Tibet (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1954); “Invasion and Illegal Annexation of Tibet: 1949–1951,” The Government of Tibet in Exile online, April 27, 1999, http://tibet.net/whitepaper/white2.html.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ewa Tabeau and Jakub Bijak, “War-Related Deaths in the 1991–1995 Armed Conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Critique of Previous Estimates and Recent Results,” European Journal of Population 21, nos. 2–3 (2005): 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mark Kurlansky, Nonviolence: Twenty-Five Lessons from the History of a Danerous Idea (New York: Modern Library, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anup Shah, “Arms Trade—A Major Cause of Suffering,” Global Issues, January 5, 2013, http://globalissues.org/issues/73/arms-trade-a-major-cause-of suffering.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cindy Combs, Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  10. Albert J. Bergson and Omar Lizardo, “International Terrorism and the World System,” Sociological Theory 22, no. 1 (2004): 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. This definition is informed by the following sources: Aqueil Ahmad and Michael Sileno, “Pre- and Post-9/11 Sociological Response to Terrorism,” International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 42, no. 2 (October 2005): 189–206;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jonathan R. White, Terrorism: An Introduction (Stanford, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gus Martin, Understanding Terrorism: Challenging, Perspectives, and Issues (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. For this line of explanations, see Aqueil Ahmad, “Powerful Reaction to Powerlessness,” Peace Review 8, no. 10 (September 1996): 423–29; and “Terrorism as Powerful Reaction to Powerlessness in Global Society” (paper presented at the Association of Humanist Sociology, Annual Meeting, Newport, RI, November 15–18, 2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rabindra Ray, The Naxalites and Their Ideology (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Aqueil Ahmad

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahmad, A. (2013). Global Conflicts. In: New Age Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319494_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics