Skip to main content

Hamlet: Looking Before and After: Why So Many Prequels and Sequels?

  • Chapter
Reinventing the Renaissance
  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

Why does Hamlet have prequels and sequels? Is it unusual in inviting readers, and more especially writers, to speculate about what might have happened both before and after the events of the play? I’ll begin by citing a few moments in the text that have proved particularly inviting. First, the closet scene: Hamlet, in reply to Gertrude’s calling the murder of Polonius ‘a bloody deed’, says ‘A bloody deed? Almost as bad, good mother, / As kill a king and marry with his brother’, to which she replies ‘As kill a king’, and he says ‘Ay lady it was my word’ (3.4.25–8).2 The tone of Gertrude’s response is not indicated by punctuation, such as a question mark or an exclamation mark, in either of the ‘good’ texts, the Second Quarto and the First Folio, and the topic is not pursued. Interestingly, in the so-called ‘bad’ First Quarto, the Queen asks for an explanation: ‘Hamlet, what mean’st thou by these killing words?’ and goes on to deny the accusation: ‘But, as I have a soul, I swear by heaven, / I never knew of this most horrid murder’. It would seem that whoever compiled this text felt the need for a clarification of this important point, and many others have followed, arguing the case both for and against Gertrude with enthusiasm and ingenuity.3

This chapter builds on an earlier version published as ‘The New Wing at Elsinore, The Redemption of the Hamlets and other Sequels, Prequels and Off-shoots of Hamlet,’ in Renaissance Refractions: Essays in Honour of Alexander Shurbanov, ed. Boika Sokolova and Evgenia Pancheva (Sofia, Bulgaria: St Kliment Ohridski Press, 2001), 217–29.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Quotations from Hamlet are from the Arden version of all three texts edited by Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor (London: Thomson Learning, 2006), 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Early twentieth-century examples, typically arguing for the Queen’s innocence, would include ‘The Frailty Whose Name Was Gertrude’ in The True Ophelia: And Other Studies of Shakespeare’s Women published anonymously by ‘An Actress’ (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1913); and Lillie Buffum Chase Wyman’s Gertrude of Denmark (Boston, MA: Marshall Jones, 1924).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Rayner Heppenstall and Michael Innes, Three Tales of Hamlet (London: Gollancz, 1950), 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Margaret Atwood, Good Bones (London: Virago, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Originally published in book form in London by W. H. Smith and Son, 1852; reprinted in New York by AMS Press, 1974. For further discussion of Mary Cowden Clarke and some extracts from her work, see Ann Thompson and Sasha Roberts, eds, Women Reading Shakespeare 1660–1900 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996), 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Updike, Gertrude and Claudius (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. It is interesting to note that Ophelia has made something of a comeback in recent teenage novels with titles like Dating Hamlet where she is a much more feisty character, capable of saving herself and her prince from the corruptions of the Danish court: Dating Hamlet by Lisa Fiedler (New York: Henry Holt, 2002). See also two similar novels, both called simply Ophelia, by Jeremy Trafford (Thirsk, Yorkshire: House of Stratus, 2001) and Lisa Klein (London: Bloomsbury, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Percy MacKaye, The Mystery of Hamlet, King of Denmark, or What We Will: A Tetralogy in Prologue to Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ (New York: Bond Wheelwright, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Percy MacKaye, Caliban by the Yellow Sands (New York: Doubleday, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Diane Alexander, Playhouse (Los Angeles, CA: Dorleac-MacLeish, 1984), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., 106–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helena Faucit, On Some of Shakespeare’s Female Characters: By One Who Has Personated Them (Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons, 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Neil Taylor’s chapter ‘An actress prepares: Seven Ophelias’, in The Afterlife of Ophelia, ed. Deanne Williams and Kaara L. Peterson (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) on how seven modern performers were encouraged to prepare for the role of Ophelia by imagining her life before the play.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graham Holderness, The Prince of Denmark (Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Denton Jaques Snider, The Redemption of the Hamlets (St Louis, MO: Mound City Press, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Denton Jaques Snider, The Shakespeariad (St Louis, MO: Sigma Publishing, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Much more recently, of course, Janet Adelman has taken a very different line on this topic in her book Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, ‘Hamlet’ to ‘The Tempest’ (New York and London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See James M. Gibson, The Philadelphia Shakespeare Story (New York: AMS Press, 1990), 139–44, and The Letters of Horace Howard Furness, ed. Horace Howard Furness Jr. (Boston, MA, and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1999), 198–21, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Published in Rayner Heppenstall and Michael Innes, Three Tales of Hamlet (London: Gollancz, 1950), 17–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (London: Faber, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edited in book form by Herbert Farjeon and published as Dramatic Sequels (London: Martin Secker, 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander Welsh, Hamlet in his Modern Guises (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Scofield, The Ghosts of ‘Hamlet’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See William Shakespeare, Hamlet, ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor (London: Thomson Learning, 2006), Appendix 5, 553–65.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alex Newell, ‘The etiology of Horatio’s inconsistencies,’ in ‘Bad’ Shakespeare: Revaluations in the Shakespeare Canon, ed. Maurice Charney (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1988), 143–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marion L. Wilson, The Tragedy of Hamlet told by Horatio (Enschede, The Netherlands: M. L. Wilson, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alethea Hayter, Horatio’s Version (London: Faber & Faber, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Ann Thompson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, A. (2013). Hamlet: Looking Before and After: Why So Many Prequels and Sequels?. In: Brown, S.A., Lublin, R.I., McCulloch, L. (eds) Reinventing the Renaissance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319401_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics