Abstract
In 2009, Bern:Ballett premiered Julia und Romeo, British choreographer Cathy Marston’s dance adaptation of Shakespeare’s tragic drama. Marston’s balletic conception of the play for the Swiss company is by no means unique. Kenneth MacMillan’s 1965 Romeo and Juliet for the Royal Ballet in London — first performed by Margot Fonteyn and Rudolf Nureyev — remains the most successful dance reworking of the tragedy, but choreographers have been employing the play as the basis of their creations since Eusebio Luzzi’s production of Giulietta e Romeo at the Théâtre Samuele, Venice, in 1785. This chapter, using Marston’s ballet as its focus, examines the process by which Early Modern text becomes movement and asks what distinguishes the linguistic content of the play form from the kinetic concept of the dance. In doing so, it discusses ‘meaning’ as a concern of Shakespearean adaptation and investigates the respective contributions of choreographer and dramaturge to the re-presentation of a literary text in narrative ballet. Marston’s reversal of Shakespeare’s play title may point too obviously at a revisionist approach to Early Modern contexts, but her concentration on Julia/Juliet as the memorial reconstructer of the ballet’s action, and hybrid use of classical and contemporary influences, may offer a challenge to Germaine Greer’s description of the dance form as ‘cultural cancer’1 — a bourgeois and enervated theatre characterized by gender types, set steps, and the crippled bodies of its principal dancers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Anna B. Scott, ‘What’s it worth to ya? Adaptation and Anachronism: Rennie Harris’s PureMovement and Shakespeare’, in The Routledge Dance Studies Reader, ed. Alexandra Carter and Janet O’Shea, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2010), 86.
James Monahan, Romeo and Juliet programme, ed. Alison Latham (London: Royal Opera House Publications, 1995), 47.
Alan Brissenden argues that dance is ‘part of the Shakespearian arsenal of dramatic irony, for the usual meaning of dance as harmonious amity is posed against the disorder which develops during the course of tragedy’. Brissenden’s catalogue of dance within Shakespeare is indispensible, but he understandably fails to reconcile the playwright’s representation of dance with his greater understanding of movement. See Shakespeare and the Dance (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1981).
All Shakespeare citations are taken from The Oxford Shakespeare, ed. John Jowett, William Montgomery, Gary Taylor and Stanley Wells, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Quoted in Philip Brockbank, ed., Players of Shakespeare: Essays in Shakespearean Performance by Twelve Players with the Royal Shakespeare Company (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 162–5.
Joe Roach, The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1985), 16.
Anthony B. Dawson, ‘Performance and Participation: Desdemona, Foucault, and the actor’s body’, in Shakespeare, Theory, and Performance, ed. James C. Bulman (London: Routledge, 1996).
Quoted in ibid., 36–7.
Baldesar (sic) Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, trans. George Bull (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967), 67.
Jessica Wolfe, Humanism, Machinery, and Renaissance Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 54.
Valerie Traub describes how ‘women who are perceived by men as erotically threatening are monumentalized, their erotic warmth transformed into the cold, static form of jewels, statues, and corpses.’ Traub’s approach risked conflating three very different categories and it also, by her own admission, ‘failed to see the possibility of female agency in excess of masculine control’. See Traub, Desire and Anxiety: Circulations of Sexuality in Shakespearean Drama (London: Routledge, 1992), 18, 49.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Lynsey McCulloch
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCulloch, L. (2013). ‘Here’s that shall make you dance’: Movement and Meaning in Bern:Ballett’s Julia und Romeo. In: Brown, S.A., Lublin, R.I., McCulloch, L. (eds) Reinventing the Renaissance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319401_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137319401_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33936-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31940-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)