Abstract
The first major war that was fought under the rules of the Declaration of Paris was the American Civil War, a confrontation between two parties who had both not signed up to the treaty. The theatre of the conflict was closely connected to Europe by transatlantic commerce, so the laws of neutrality became the field where the European states first had to define their positions vis-à-vis the belligerents. Nearly all of the decisive questions regarding the recognition of the Confederacy first arose in a naval context, and maritime law assumed an exceptional importance in the diplomacy of the early Civil War. Because of this prominent position, the American Civil War is the only mid-19th-century conflict for which the importance of maritime law has been recognised by many, though not all, diplomatic historians.1 However, the best specialists in this field, such as Warren Spencer, Lynn Case and Frank Merli, were first and foremost Civil War historians and knew little about the laws of neutrality in the decades before or after 1861–5. Therefore they never claimed to be able to explain the significance of the Civil War to the wider history of neutrality. As Frank Merli put it, ‘the precise relationship between that 1856 declaration of neutral rights and the American war has never been properly defined’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cowley to Russell, 4 April 1863, cited in James P. Baxter, ‘Some British Opinions as to Neutral Rights, 1861 to 1865’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 23, No. 3 (July 1929), pp. 517–537, p. 537.
James Baxter III, ‘The British Government and Neutral Rights, 1861–1865’, American Historical Review, Vol. 34 (October 1928), pp. 9–29; Bernath, Squall across the Atlantic, p. 12. Spencer Tucker argues that this was inspired by Britain’s ‘historic practice’ of demanding respect for paper blockades. See Blue and Gray Navies, p. 71. Both Howard Jones and Amanda Foreman have recently argued that Britain ignored reports of the blockade’s ineffectiveness to secure an advantage in case ‘Great Britain might find herself in the similar position of mounting a feeble blockade’, Amanda Foreman, A World On Fire, London 2011, p. 211; Howard Jones, Blue and Gray Diplomacy: A History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations, Chapel Hill, NC, 2010, p. 56.
James Baxter III, ‘The British Government and Neutral Rights, 1861–1865’, American Historical Review, Vol. 34 (October 1928), pp. 9–29.
Kenneth Bourne, ‘British Preparations for War with the North, 1861–1862’, English Historical Review, Vol. 76 (1961), pp. 600–632.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Jan Martin Lemnitzer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemnitzer, J.M. (2014). The Declaration of Paris and the American Civil War. In: Power, Law and the End of Privateering. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318633_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318633_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33738-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31863-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)