Skip to main content

Single Policy Study: Three Variations in Design

  • Chapter
Research Methods in European Union Studies

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Single policy studies are the most common form of EU research. They are widely used to understand the role of the EU in a wide variety of sectors, together with its development over time, and often offer public policy prescriptions. The main aim of this chapter is to discuss the relevance of single policy studies in EU research and give examples of how such research can be carried out and designed. It begins by discussing single policy studies in terms of their potential, but also their weakness and limitations. One clear advantage is that a single policy study entails a choice of method that is not associated with a specific perspective, framework or theory but can be used broadly, for example within rationalist, process oriented, constructivist and critical frameworks (Bacchi, 1999; Hajer and Wagenaar, 2003; Sabatier, 2007). It is not locked into or associated with a specific perspective or theory. After a brief presentation and problematisation of the single policy study as a method in EU research, the chapter will review three different research designs that study different single policies: EU environmental policy, the biofuels directive and the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). The examples are illustrative of how policy study can be designed using three different theoretical approaches in the analysis: multiple streams approach to policy making, comparative hypothesis testing and feminist institutional theory. While there are multiple ways to design a policy study, how it is done is determined by the research question, the perspective and the theoretical approach employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, M. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) (1999) European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. and Eliassen, K. (eds.) (1993) Making Policy in Europe: The Europeification of National Policy-Making (London: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C.L. (1999) Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. and Lauder, H. (2011) ‘Researching Policy’, in Somekh, B. and Lewin, C. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Social Research, 2nd edn. (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (1999) ‘Toward Convergence in Europe?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 573–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2002) ‘Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. (2003) Environmental Leaders and Laggards in Europe: Why There Is (Not) a ‘Southern Problem’ (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M., March, J. and Olsen, J. (1972) ‘Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch, H. (1998) Policy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995) Masculinities (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1998) ‘Masculinities and Globalization’, Men and Masculinities 1(1): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lucia, L. and Kronsell, A. (2010) ‘The Willing, the Unwilling and the Unable — Explaining Implementation of the EU Biofuels Directive’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 545–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G. (2000) ‘Policy Networks in a Multi-Level System: Convergence Towards Moderate Diversity?’, West European Politics 23(4): 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying With Europe? The Impact of EU Minimum Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J. and Risse, T. (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. (eds.) (2003) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakhverdian, A., van Elsas, E., van der Brug, W. and Kuhn, T. (2013) Euroscepticism and Education: A Longitudinal Study of Twelve EU Member States, 1973–2010, GINI Discussion Paper 92, August 2013 http://gini-research.org/system/uploads/590/original/92.pdf?1385131386 accessed 25 March 2014.

  • Heichel, S., Pape, J. and Sommerer, T. (2005) ‘Is There Convergence in Convergence Research? An Overview of Empirical Studies on Policy Convergence’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(5): 817–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, G.T. (1990) Practical Sampling (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heritier, A., and Knill, C. (2001) ‘Differential Responses to European Policies: A Comparison’, in Heritier, A., Kerwer, D., Knill, C., Teutsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (eds.) Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritier, A., Knill, C. and Mingers, S. (1996) Ringing the Changes in Europe (Berlin: De Gruyer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heritier, A., Kerwer, D., Knill, C., Teutsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2001) Differential Europe: The European Union Impact on National Policymaking (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, K.-M. (ed.) (2002) Sverige i EU (Stockholm: SNS Förlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. (2002) The Europeanization of British Environmental Policy. A Departmental Perspective (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. and Adelle, C. (eds.) (2012) Environmental Policy in the EU: Actors, Institutions and Processes, 3rd edn. (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) (2004) Environmental Policy in Europe. The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J. (2010) Gender and the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (1998) ‘European Policies: The Impact of National Administrative Traditions’, Journal of Public Policy 18(1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and Lenschow, A. (2005) ‘Compliance, Communication and Competition: Patterns of EU Environmental Policy Making and Their Impact on Policy Convergence’, European Environment 15: 114–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, A.-C. L. (2009) Farmers on Welfare: The Making of Europe’s Common Agricultural Policy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (1997) Greening the European Union: Power Practices, Resistances and Agenda Setting (Lund: Lund University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (2002) ‘Can Small States Influence EU Norms? Insights From Sweden’s Participation in the Field of Environmental Politics’, Scandinavian Studies 74(3): 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (2005) ‘Gender, Power and European Integration Theory’, European Journal of Public Policy 12(6): 1022–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell, A. (2012) Gender, Sex and the Postnational Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, R. (1994) ‘Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France’, Journal of Common Market Studies 32(1): 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B. (1983) ‘Policy Implementation in the European Community: The European Social Fund as a Case Study’, Journal of Common Market Studies 21(4): 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, U. (2003a) ‘Gendering Europeanisation: Patterns and Dynamics’, in Liebert, U. (ed.) Gendering Europeanisation (Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, U. (2003b) ‘Between Diversity and Equality: Analysing Europeanisation’, in Liebert, U. (ed.) Gendering Europeanisation (Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefferink, D. and Jordan, A. (2004) ‘Europeanization and Policy Convergence: A Basis for Comparative Analysis’, in Jordan, A. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, H. (2006) ‘Rescaling Gender Relations: The Influence of European Directives on the German Gender Regime’, Social Politics 13(4): 522–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusdóttir, G.L. (2009) Small States’ Power Resources in EU Negotiations: The Cases of Sweden, Denmark and Finland in the Environmental Policy of the European Union (Reykjavík: University of Iceland, Department of Political Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2000) Substance and Symbolism: An Anatomy of Cooperation in the New Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2003) ‘European Studies’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 11(1): 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2013) ‘Europeiska unionen i den globala miljön’, in Bengtsson, R., Manners, I., Persson, H-Ã…, Gröning, L. and Zetterquis, O. (eds.) Det europeiska projektet: Politik och juridik — historia och framtid (Malmö: Liber AB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2014) ‘The Political Psychology of European Integration’, in Capelos, T., Kinnvall, C., Nesbitt-Larking, P. and Dekker, H. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsen, D.S. (2005) ‘The Europeanization of Welfare: The Domestic Impact of Intra-European Social Security’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43(5): 1027–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, E. and van Keulen, M. (2005) ‘Beyond the Goodness of Fit: A Preference Based Account of Europeanization’, in Haverland, M. and Holzhacker, R. (eds.) European Research Reloaded: Cooperation and Integration Among Europeanized States (Deventer: Kluwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, N. and O’Carroll, C. (2010) ‘Benchmarking Europe’s Lab Benches: How Successful Has the OMC Been in Research Policy?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 48(2): 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meny, Y., Muller, P. and Quermonne, J.-L. (eds.) (1996) Adjusting to Europe: The Impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (2010) Governing Through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. (2000) ‘Research on Policy Implementation: Assessment and Prospects’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 263–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petõ, A. and Manners, I. (2006) ‘The European Union and the Value of Gender Equality’, in Lucarelli, S. and Manners, I. (eds.) Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, T. (1998) Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union, Education and Training and Labour Market Policies (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2003) ‘Bridging the Gap Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Worlds? A Retrospective and Prospective View on Comparative Analysis’, Field Methods 5(4): 351–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C. (2004) ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): State of the Art and Prospects’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2–5 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000) Theories of European Integration (Basingstoke. Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (ed.) (2007) Theories of the Policy Process (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2002) ‘Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research Focus, Hypotheses, and the State of Research’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(4): 500–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. and Radaelli, C. (2004) ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues’, West European Politics 27(2): 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. and Wegemann, C. (2010) ‘Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets’, Comparative Sociology 9: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2002) ‘Sverige och efterlevnaden av EU:s regelverk’, in Johansson, K.-M. (ed.) Sverige i EU (Stockholm: SNS Förlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1995) ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarianism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism’, British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten, A. (2012) ‘Gendering the Institutions and Actors of the EU’, in Abels, G. and Mushaben, J.M. (eds.) Gendering the European Union. New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (ed.) (2007) Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe (Budapest: Central European University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wahl, A. (2005) ‘Liberal, Conservative, Social Democratic, or… European? The European Union as Equal Employment Regime’, Social Politics 12(1): 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. (1983) ‘Theoretical Perspectives and Problems’, in Wallace, H., Wallace, W. and Webb, C. (eds.) Policy-Making in the European Community, 2nd edn. (Chichester: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2003) ‘European Gender Mainstreaming: Promises and Pitfalls of Transformative Policy’, Review of Policy Research 20(1): 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2008) ‘Too Late for Mainstreaming: The View From Brussels’, European Journal of Social Policy 18(3): 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2012) ‘From Equal Treatment to Gender Mainstreaming and Diversity Management’, in Abels, G. and Mushaben, J.M. (eds.) Genderingthe European Union. New Approaches to Old Democratic Deficits (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (2003) Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd edn. (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Annica Kronsell and Ian Manners

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kronsell, A., Manners, I. (2015). Single Policy Study: Three Variations in Design. In: Lynggaard, K., Manners, I., Löfgren, K. (eds) Research Methods in European Union Studies. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316967_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics