Skip to main content

Japan, China, Russia, and the American “Pivot”: A Triangular Analysis

  • Chapter
The Troubled Triangle

Part of the book series: Asia Today ((ASIAT))

Abstract

Japan, China, Russia, and the United States, four of the most powerful nations in the world, positioned cheek by jowl in Northeast Asia with some of the world’s most extensive trade and mutually interlocking investments binding them together, have long had “complicated” political-strategic relations. They form two duos, each of which is or was formally bound by a mutual security alliance. In focus here is the Japan-US security alliance (JUSA). Though the JUSA is “the most important bilateral relationship in the world, bar none” (according to former ambassador Mike Mansfield), forming the northern tier of the pentagonal US “hub-and-spokes” Asian-Pacific alliance network, it is a bilateral alliance from which China is excluded. The JUSA has never been explicitly directed against China but against the former Soviet Union, wherein it enjoyed full Chinese support. Since the end of the Cold War eliminated the Soviet Union as a target of the alliance and both Sino-American and Sino-Japanese relations began for a number of reasons to fray, China’s view of the alliance has grown increasingly skeptical, however.

Financial support from the Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership and the Murata Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Glenn H. Snyder, “Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut,” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 44, No. 1 (Spring-Summer 1990): 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephen Walt, “Alliances in a Unipolar World,” World Politics, Vol. 61, No. 1 (January 2009): 86–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takashi Inoguchi, “The Triangle of Japan, South Korea and the United States in Northeast Asia: A Japanese Quasi-Constructivist Perspective,” Japan Spotlight, Vol. 24, No. 5 (September–October 2005): 32–33;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian Frederking, “Constructing Post-Cold War Collective Security,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 97, No. 3 (August 2003): 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas, Wm. I. and F. Znaniecki, The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, 5 Volumes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1918–1920).

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Jingquan, “Zhan hou Zhong Ri jie meng guan bijiao yanjiu: yi Zhong Su tong meng, Ri Mei tong meng wei li” [A comparative study of the Chinese and Japanese concepts of alliance formation, taking the Sino-Soviet and Japanese-US alliances as examples], unpublished paper, Jinan University, Changchun, China, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hua-yu Li, Mao and the Economic Stalinization of China, 1948–1953 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas J. Christensen (Worse than a Monolith: Alliance Politics and Problems of Coercive Diplomacy in Asia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Jian Chen, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Odd Arne Westad, ed., Brothers in Arms: The Rise and Fall of the Sino-Soviet Alliance, 1945–1963 (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenz M. Luthi, The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Kueisong, “Changes in Mao Zedong’s Attitude toward the Indochina War, 1949–1973,” Cold War International History Project Working Paper No. 34 (February 2002), as quoted in Christensen, Worse than a Monolith, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marc Lanteigne, Chinese Foreign Policy (New York: Routledge, 2009), 68–69.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert Rozman, “Post-Cold War Evolution of Chinese Thinking on Regional Institutions in Northeast Asia,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 19, No. 66 (September 2010): 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong Fanhe and Mao Qian, “Feichuantong anquan shijiaoxia de anquan limian” [Security conceptions from a non-traditional security perspective], Taipingyang xuebao, Vol. 57, No. 12 (2005): 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mel Gurtov and Peter Van Ness, Confronting the Bush Doctrine (London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005), 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iris Chang, Nanjing hao jie: bei yi wang de da tu sha [The Nanjing massacre] (Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. F. K. Organski, World Politics (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ronald L. Tammen, Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Carole Alsharabati, Brian Efird, and A. F. K. Organski, Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century (New York: Chatham House, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lowell Dittmer, Sino-Soviet Normalization and Its International Implications (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charles P. Kindleberger, The World in Depression, 1929–1939, revised and enlarged edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Albert Wohlstetter, The Delicate Balance of Terror (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp, 1958), Rand report number P-1472.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund, kaigai keizai kyoroku binran, 1987, 251;

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rex Li, A Rising China and Security in East Asia: Identity Construction and Security Discourse (New York: Routledge, 2009), 215.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xinbo Wu, “The End of the Silver Lining: A Chinese View of the US-Japan Alliance,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Winter 2005–2006): 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Takashi Inoguchi G. John Ikenberry

Copyright information

© 2013 Takashi Inoguchi and G. John Ikenberry

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dittmer, L. (2013). Japan, China, Russia, and the American “Pivot”: A Triangular Analysis. In: Inoguchi, T., Ikenberry, G.J. (eds) The Troubled Triangle. Asia Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316851_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics