Skip to main content
  • 427 Accesses

Abstract

The Gordon riots were the most dramatic of London’s history, paralysing the forces of law and order for almost a week in early June 1780. Erupting at a time of imperial crisis and new reformist movements, the disturbances resonated with the resentments of war; they were the platform on which bitter political differences — about Catholics, about America, about the sovereignty of parliament — were played out. The riots also sorely tested the relationship between street politics and radical associations, prompting the question as to whether crowds and ‘people’ were interdependent or mutually exclusive; part of the same vector of popular remonstrance or wildly divergent. For these reasons, the riots were the most complex the eighteenth century had witnessed. They posed serious questions about the shape and future of popular politics in the decades to come.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See accounts in the London Chronicle, 6–9, 25–27 February 1779 and 16–18 March 1779. The fullest account in is Eugene C. Black, The Association: British Extraparliamentary Political Organization 1769–1793 (Cambridge, MA, 1963), pp. 134–47.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 14 George III, c. 83. See also Hilda Neatby The Quebec Act: Protest and Policy (Scarborough, Ontario, 1973), pp. 58–61, for Dartmouth’s instructions as to how the act should be executed.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colin Haydon, Anti-Catholicism in Eighteenth-Century England c. 1714–1780 (Oxford, 1993), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip Lawson, The Imperial Challenge: Quebec and Britain in the Age of the American Revolution (Montreal and Kingston, 1989), ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholas Rogers, Crowds, Culture and Politics in Georgian Britain (Oxford, 1998), ch. 4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. RD.G. Thomas, Lord North (London, 1976), pp. 121–22. Poynings Law gave the Privy Council the right of veto over Irish legislation.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Paul de Castro, The Gordon Riots (London, 1926), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  8. TNA, SP 37/20/41 and SP 37/20/47; The Mawhood Diary, ed. E.E. Reynolds (London, 1956), pp. 150–51; James Langdale, ‘Thomas Langdale, The Distiller’, London Recusant, 10 (1975), pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George Rudé cites 15 people brought to trial for thefts during the riots, of which seven were found not guilty. See Rudé, Paris and London in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1970), p. 282.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Surrey Proceedings, pp. 44–45. For a detailed account of the disposition of the armed forces, see Tony Hayter, The Army and the Crowd in Mid-Georgian England (London, 1978), ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James Boswell, Life of Johnson, ed. R.W. Chapman (London, 1953), p. 1059. On ‘reversal crowds’,

    Google Scholar 

  12. see Elias Canetti, Crowds and Power, trans. Carol Stewart (Harmondsworth, 1973), pp. 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Castro, The Gordon Riots, p. 218; Marsha Keith Schuchard, ‘Lord George Gordon and Cabalistic Freemasonry: Beating Jacobite Swords into Jacobin Ploughshares’, in Secret Conversions to Judaism in Early Modern Europe, ed. Martin Mulsow and Richard H. Popkin (Leiden, 2004) p. 203. I have found no evidence of a Bailston in histories of the Boston Tea Party, so it is conceivable that the British miss-spelt the name.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Sainsbury Disaffected Patriots. London Supporters of Revolutionary America, 1769–1782 (Kingston and Montreal, 1987), pp. 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Nicholas Rogers, ‘Crowd and People in the Gordon Riots’, in The Transformation of Political Culture. England and Germany in the Late Eighteenth Century, ed. Eckhart Hellmuth (Oxford, 1990), pp. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Nicholas Rogers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, N. (2015). Nights of Fire: The Gordon Riots of 1780 and the Politics of War. In: Davis, M.T. (eds) Crowd Actions in Britain and France from the Middle Ages to the Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316516_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316516_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55766-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31651-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics