Skip to main content

Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing

  • Chapter
Comparative Policy Studies

Part of the book series: Research Methods Series ((REMES))

Abstract

Case-study research has been defined by Yin as an in-depth investigation of (contemporary) phenomena in a real-life context, particularly equipped to answer how and why questions (2009: pp. 8–18). Yin and other authors of case studies offer various analytical strategies for studying one of a few cases in depth, ranging from theoretically informed pattern matching (Yin, 2009) to strongly inductive approaches (Stake, 1995). This chapter deals with one specific approach: Causal-Process Tracing (CPT). This methodological approach is particularly well suited to answer ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions because it focuses on the causal conditions, configurations and mechanisms which make a specific outcome possible. It is outcome (Y)-centred, which means that the researcher is interested in the many and complex causes of a specific outcome and not so much in the effects of a specific cause (X). In other words, CPT is geared to answer questions like ‘why did this (Y) happen?’ Furthermore, its aim is to reveal the sequential and situational interplay between causal conditions and mechanisms in order to show in detail how these causal factors generate the outcome of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Beach, Derek and Rasmus Brun Pedersen (2012) Process Tracing Methods — Foundations and Guidelines (University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew (2008) ‘Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective’, in Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady and Collier David (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (Oxford University Press), 702–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew (2010) ‘Process Tracing and Causal Inference’, in Henry E. Brady and David Collier (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd edn (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), 207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Andrew and Colin Elman (2006) ‘Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence’, Political Analysis, 14 (3), 250–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, Joachim (2009) ‘Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism beyond Regime Theory’, Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, Joachim (2012) ‘Taking Terminology and Timing Seriously: On Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of Causal-Process Tracing’, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, 10–14 April 2012, Antwerp. [http://www.unilu.ch/files/blatter-taking-terminology-and-timing-seriously-ecpr-antwerp.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William H. (2005) The Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soifer, Hillel David (2010) ‘The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures’, Political Methodology Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, vol. 24 (January 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, Robert E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, Philip and Aaron Belkin (eds) (1996) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives (Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Evera, Stephen (1997) Guide to the Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert (2009 [1984]) Case Study Research (Thousand Oaks: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Joachim Blatter and Markus Haverland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blatter, J., Haverland, M. (2014). Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing. In: Engeli, I., Allison, C.R. (eds) Comparative Policy Studies. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics