Abstract
Case-study research has been defined by Yin as an in-depth investigation of (contemporary) phenomena in a real-life context, particularly equipped to answer how and why questions (2009: pp. 8–18). Yin and other authors of case studies offer various analytical strategies for studying one of a few cases in depth, ranging from theoretically informed pattern matching (Yin, 2009) to strongly inductive approaches (Stake, 1995). This chapter deals with one specific approach: Causal-Process Tracing (CPT). This methodological approach is particularly well suited to answer ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions because it focuses on the causal conditions, configurations and mechanisms which make a specific outcome possible. It is outcome (Y)-centred, which means that the researcher is interested in the many and complex causes of a specific outcome and not so much in the effects of a specific cause (X). In other words, CPT is geared to answer questions like ‘why did this (Y) happen?’ Furthermore, its aim is to reveal the sequential and situational interplay between causal conditions and mechanisms in order to show in detail how these causal factors generate the outcome of interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Beach, Derek and Rasmus Brun Pedersen (2012) Process Tracing Methods — Foundations and Guidelines (University of Michigan Press).
Bennett, Andrew (2008) ‘Process Tracing: A Bayesian Perspective’, in Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady and Collier David (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (Oxford University Press), 702–21.
Bennett, Andrew (2010) ‘Process Tracing and Causal Inference’, in Henry E. Brady and David Collier (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry, 2nd edn (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), 207–19.
Bennett, Andrew and Colin Elman (2006) ‘Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence’, Political Analysis, 14 (3), 250–67.
Blatter, Joachim (2009) ‘Performing Symbolic Politics and International Environmental Regulation: Tracing and Theorizing a Causal Mechanism beyond Regime Theory’, Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), 81–110.
Blatter, Joachim (2012) ‘Taking Terminology and Timing Seriously: On Ontological and Epistemological Foundations of Causal-Process Tracing’, Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, 10–14 April 2012, Antwerp. [http://www.unilu.ch/files/blatter-taking-terminology-and-timing-seriously-ecpr-antwerp.pdf]
Sewell, William H. (2005) The Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation (Chicago University Press).
Skocpol, Theda (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (Cambridge University Press).
Soifer, Hillel David (2010) ‘The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures’, Political Methodology Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, vol. 24 (January 2010).
Stake, Robert E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research (London: Sage).
Tetlock, Philip and Aaron Belkin (eds) (1996) Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives (Princeton University Press).
van Evera, Stephen (1997) Guide to the Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Yin, Robert (2009 [1984]) Case Study Research (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Joachim Blatter and Markus Haverland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blatter, J., Haverland, M. (2014). Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing. In: Engeli, I., Allison, C.R. (eds) Comparative Policy Studies. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33498-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31415-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)