Abstract
Global climate change is the most serious and complex problem facing international society in the twenty-first century. The scientific uncertainties and political tensions inherent in resolving the problem mean that it cannot be addressed on the basis of a traditional top-down approach. Framing climate change as a governance issue focuses attention upon the importance of reflexive, inclusive and flexible decision-making. It also underscores the role of leadership and institutions (both formal and informal) that, in turn, raise questions about the locus of authority as well as normative concerns over equity and justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M.C. Lemos and A. Agrawal, ‘Environmental Governance’, Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 31 (2006), 315.
S. Bernstein and B. Cashore, ‘Non-State Global Governance: Is Forest Certification a Legitimate Alternative to a Global Forest Convention?’, in J. Kirton and M. Trebilcock (eds.) Hard Choices, Soft Law: Combining Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in Global Governance (London: Ashgate Press, 2004), p. 140.
F. Biermann, P. Pattberg, H.V. Asselt, and F. Zelli, ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architecture: A Framework for Analysis’, Global Environmental Politics, 9:4 (2009), 15.
D. Biello, ‘The Price of Coal in China: Can China Fuel Growth Without Warming the World’, Scientific American, 16 December 2010.
J.D. Cunningham, A History of the Sikhs: From the Origin of the Nation to the Battle of the Sutlej (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1918).
For a detailed survey, see K. Morton, ‘Climate Change and Security at the Third Pole’, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 52:7 (2011), 121–32.
W.W. Immerzeel et al., ‘Climate Will Affect the Asian Water Towers’, Science, 328:5984 (2010), 1382–5.
R.J. Nicholls et al, ‘Increasing Flood Risk and Wetland Losses due to Global Sea-Level Rise: Regional and Global Analyses’, Global Environmental Change, 9 (1999), S69–S87.
For a comprehensive report, see R.S. Wang and J.D. Bean (ed.) ‘Asia’s Response to Climate Change and Natural Disasters: Implications for an Evolving Regional Architecture’, A Report of the CSIS Asia Regionalism Initiative (Washington, D.C.: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2010)
A. Brettell, ‘Security, Energy, and the Environment: The Atmospheric Link’ in In-t’aek Hyon and M. Schreurs (eds.), The Environmental Dimension of Asian Security: Conflict and Cooperation over Energy, Resources, and Pollution (Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2007), p. 105.
S. Soloman et al. (ed.) Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
The Royal Society, Climate Change: A Summary of the Science (London: The Royal Society, 2010), p. 9.
See J.M. Witte, C. Streck and T. Benner, ‘The Road From Johannesburg: What Future for Partnerships in Global Environmental Governance?’, in J.M. Witte, C. Streck and T. Benner (eds.), Progress or Peril? Partnerships and Networks in Global Environmental Governance (Washington, D.C.: Global Public Policy Institute, 2003) and K. Bäckstrand, T. Hale and D. Mauzerall, ‘Thinking Globally and Acting Locally: Can the Johannesburg Partnerships Coordinate Action on Sustainable Development?’, Journal of Environment and Development, 13:3 (2004), 220–39.
P. Gleick et al., The New Economy of Water: The Risks and Benefits of Globalisation and Privatisation of Fresh Water (Oakland: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, 2002).
K. Bäckstrand, ‘Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Partnerships’, Global Environmental Politics, 8:3 (2008), 78.
See J. McGee and R. Taplin, ‘The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: A Complement or Competitor to the Kyoto Protocol?’, Global Change, Peace, and Security, 18:3 (2006), 173–92.
Alan Oxley, ‘New Winds on Climate’, Washington Times, 20 February 2007.
N. Fujiwara, ‘The Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: What Is It and What Is It Not?’ CEPS Policy Brief, 144:5 (2007).
T. Brewer, ‘International Energy Technology Transfers for Climate Change Mitigation: What, who, how, why, when, where, how much … and the implications for international institutional architecture’, Paper presented for CESifo Venice Summer Institute Workshop Europe and Global Environmental Issues, Venice, Italy, 14–15 July 2008.
S.I. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen and H.V. Asset, ‘Introduction: Exploring and Explaining the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate’, International Environmental Arrangements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 9:3 (2009), 205.
K.R. Smith, ‘Risk Transition and Global Warming’, Journal of Energy Engineering, 116:3 (1990), 178–88.
G.M. Heggelund and I.F. Buan, ‘China in the Asia-Pacific Partnership: Consequences for UN Climate Change Mitigation Efforts?’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, and Economics, 9:3 (2009), 311.
International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050, (Paris: IEA, 2008).
S.J. Zhang, ‘Quanqiu qihou zhengzhi de biange yu zhongguo mianlin de sanjiao nanti’ [Changes in Global Climate Politics and China’s Triangle Dilemma], Shijie jingji yu zhengzhi [World Economics and Politics], 10 (2010), 97–116.
K. Morton, ‘China and Global Climate Policy Making: Leadership in a State of Flux’ in X.M. Huang and R.G. Patman (ed.), China and the International System: Becoming a World Power (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), forthcoming.
J. McGee and R. Taplin, ‘The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: A Retreat from the Principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities?’, McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 5:1 (2009), 11–43.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Katherine Morton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morton, K. (2013). Responding to Climate Change in the Region: New Partnerships and Chinese Leadership. In: Prantl, J. (eds) Effective Multilateralism. St Antony’ Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312983_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312983_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33488-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31298-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)