Abstract
Norbert Elias and Hannah Arendt are both major twentieth-century thinkers, lionized for their striking and powerfully original visions. Yet rarely are they treated together or their perspectives compared. The foremost reason for this is doubtless the sharply divergent ways in which they both conceived of the value and significance of sociology. Elias was, throughout his life, an indefatigable defender of the discipline, seeking to promote its autonomy and to critique traditional philosophy from a sociological perspective. Arendt’s early allegiance to Existenz philosophy drew her to heavily criticize what she perceived to be the pretensions of sociology, and although in her later years she became more sharply critical of philosophy, she always retained an intense, even vituperative, dislike of sociology.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, T. W. 1977. “Commitment,” translated by F. McDonagh. In Aesthetics and Politics, by T. Adorno, W. Benjamin, E. Bloch, B. Brecht, and G. Lukács, 177–195. London: Verso.
Arendt, H. 1963. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin.
Arendt, H. 1971. The Life of the Mind. Single-volume edition. New York: Harvest/HBJ.
Arendt, H. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. 1994a. “Mankind and Terror.” In Essays in Understanding 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, 297–306. New York: Schocken.
Arendt, H. 1994b. “Philosophy and Sociology.” In Essays in Understanding 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, 28–43. New York: Schocken.
Arendt, H. 1996. Love and St. Augustine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Arendt, H., and Karl Jaspers. 1992. Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers Correspondence 1926–1969. Edited by L. Kohler and H. Saner. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Aron, R. 1957. The Opium of the Intellectuals. Translated by T. Kilmartin. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Books.
Baehr, P. 2002. “Identifying the Unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism and the Critique of Sociology.” American Sociological Review 67: 804–831.
Baehr, P. 2010. Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism and the Social Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Benhabib S. 2000. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
D’Entreves, M. P. 1994. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.
Elias, N. 1969. The Court Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elias, N. 1970. What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.
Elias, N. 1971. “Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives, Part Two.” Sociology 5: 355–370.
Elias, N. 1978. The Civilizing Process, Volume I: The History of Manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elias, N. 1982. The Civilizing Process, Volume II: State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elias, N. 1984, The Loneliness of the Dying. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Elias, N. 1987b. “Problems of Involvement and Detachment.” In Involvement and Detachment, edited by Stephen Quilley, 3–104. Volume 8 of The Collected Works of Norbert Elias. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.
Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
Jaspers, K. 1989. On Max Weber. New York: Paragon.
Kettler, D., C. Loader, and V. Meja. 2008. Karl Mannheim and the Legacy of Max Weber: Retrieving a Research Programme. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kuipers, G. 2010. “Her Majesty’s Bicycle: On National Habitus and Sociological Comparison.” Figurations 34: 1–15. Special supplement.
Mannheim, K. 1930. “Competition as a Cultural Phenomenon.” In Essays in the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by P. Kecskemeti, 192–198. London: Routledge.
Mannheim, K. 1960. Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.
Mennell, S. 1989. Norbert Elias. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mennell, S. 2007. The American Civilizing Process. London: Polity.
Pitkin, H. 1998. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tilly, C. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States: AD 990–1990. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Tilly, C. 2007. Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walsh, P. 2008. “Hannah Arendt, Sociology. and Political Modernity.” Journal of Classical Sociology 8 (3): 344–366.
Walsh, P. 2011. “The Human Condition as Social Ontology: Hannah Arendt on Society, Action, and Knowledge.” History of the Human Sciences 24 (2): 120–137.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 François Dépelteau and Tatiana Savoia Landini
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walsh, P. (2013). Norbert Elias and Hannah Arendt on Philosophy, Sociology, and Science. In: Dépelteau, F., Landini, T.S. (eds) Norbert Elias and Social Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312112_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312112_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45716-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31211-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)