Abstract
In 1994, the US Congress passed the “Gun Free Schools Act”, requiring states to enforce “zero tolerance” expulsion of students specifically for firearms found on school property (Advancement Project, 2005). As a result, states not only determined that this was a worthwhile effort for protecting youth enrolled in schools, but also that this approach could (and should) be expanded to incorporate other forms of behavior and other, more formal forms of discipline. Moreover, a lack of clearly defined punishment(s) for zero tolerance activities allowed for the social and criminological construction of implementing a myriad of sanctions for a wide variety of behaviors (Skiba and Knesting, 2001). While there have been numerous social and political instances that have influenced the overall growth of “zero tolerance” policies in schools and the growth of the “school-to-prison pipeline” type of punishments (e.g., the growth of gang violence in the early 1990s), it can be argued that no single instance holds greater influence on these policies than the Columbine school shooting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Advancement Project (2005) Education on Lockdown: The Schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track (Washington, DC: Advancement Project).
Advancement Project (2007) Youth Speak Out on the School-to-Prison Pipeline (Washington, DC: Advancement Project).
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008) “Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations”, American Psychologist, 63 (9), 852–862.
Aull IV, E. H. (2012) “Zero Tolerance, Frivolous Juvenile Court Referrals, and the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Using Arbitration as a Screening-Out Method to Help Plug the Pipeline”, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 27, 179–206.
Beccaria, C. (2011) On Crimes and Punishments (Piscataway, NJ: Transaction).
Callinicos, A. T. (1999). Social Theory: A Historical Introduction (New York: New York University Press).
Cockerham, W. C., T. Abel and G. Lüschen (1993) “Max Weber, Formal Rationality, and Health Lifestyles”, The Sociological Quarterly, 34 (3), 413–428.
Cullen, D. (2009) Columbine (New York: Hachette Book Group).
Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Gerth, H. H. and C. W. Mills (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press).
Gonzalez, T. (2011) “Keeping Kids in Schools: Restorative Justice, Punitive Discipline, and the School to Prison Pipeline”, Journal of Law and Education, 41 (2), 281–335.
Goode, E. (2002) “Does the Death of the Sociology of Deviance Claim Make Sense?”, The American Sociologist, 33 (3), 107–118.
Gordon, V. (2009) “Early Twentieth Century Management Theories and Models That Shaped Twenty-First Century Leadership”, Journal of Philosophy & History of Education, 59, 67–70.
Greenwood, R. and T. B. Lawrence (2005) “The Iron Cage in the Information Age: The Legacy and Relevance of Max Weber for Organizational Studies”, Editorial, Organization Studies, 26 (4), 493–499.
Heaviside, S., C. Rowand, C. Williams and E. Farris (1998) Violence and Discipline Problems in U.S. Public Schools: 1996–97 (NCES 98–030) (Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics).
Inverarity, J. M., P. Lauderdale and B. Feld (1983) Law and Society: Sociological Perspectives on Criminal Law (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).
MacRae, D. G. (1974) Weber (London: Fontana Collins).
Ritzer, G. and D. Walczak (1988) “Rationalization and the Deprofessionalization of Physicians”, Social Forces, 67 (1), 1–22.
Robbins, B. B. (1956). “A Code of Ethics Is Born”. The Clearing House, 31 (2), 80–83.
Schaub, Jr., G. (2004) “Deterrence, Compellence, and Prospect Theory”, Political Psychology, 25 (3), 389–411.
Skiba, R. J. and K. Knesting (2001) “Zero Tolerance, Zero Evidence: An Analysis of School Disciplinary Practice”, in R. J. Skiba and G. G. Noam (eds.) New Directions for Youth Development (No. 92: Zero Tolerance: Can Suspension and Expulsion Keep Schools Safe?) (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
Skiba, R. J. and M. K. Rausch (2006) “Zero Tolerance, Suspension, and Expulsion: Questions of Equity and Effectiveness”, in C. M. Evertson and C. S. Weinstein (eds.) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).
Sterling, J. S. and W. E. Moore (1987) “Weber’s Analysis of Legal Rationalization: A Critique and Constructive Modification”, Sociological Forum, 2 (1), 67–89.
Sumner, C. (1994) The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press).
Texas Appleseed (2007) Texas’ School to Prison Pipeline — Dropout to Incarceration: The Impact of School Discipline and Zero Tolerance (Austin, TX: Texas Appleseed).
Tiryakian, E. A. (1981) “The Sociological Import of a Metaphor: Tracking the Source of Max Weber’s ‘Iron Cage’”, Sociological Forum, 51 (1), 27–33.
Trubek, D. M. (1972) “Max Weber on the Law and the Rise of Capitalism”, The Yale Law Journal, 82 (1), 1–50.
Weber, M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, T. Parsons (trans.) (London: Unwin University Press).
Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, A. N. Henderson and Talcott Parsons (trans.) (New York: Free Press).
Welsh, J. (2013) “16-Year-Old Florida Honor Student Charged with Two Felonies for Doing a Science Experiment”, Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com/kiera-wilmot-arrested-for-science-explosion-2013-5, date accessed May 2, 2013.
Williams, K. R. and J. P. Gibbs (1981) “Deterrence and Knowledge of Statutory Penalties”, The Sociological Quarterly, 22 (4), 591–606.
Copyright information
© 2014 Scott Wm. Bowman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bowman, S.W. (2014). The School-to-Prison Pipeline and the “Death of Deviance” in the American Public School System. In: The Death and Resurrection of Deviance. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303806_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303806_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45432-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30380-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)