Skip to main content

The School-to-Prison Pipeline and the “Death of Deviance” in the American Public School System

  • Chapter
The Death and Resurrection of Deviance

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

In 1994, the US Congress passed the “Gun Free Schools Act”, requiring states to enforce “zero tolerance” expulsion of students specifically for firearms found on school property (Advancement Project, 2005). As a result, states not only determined that this was a worthwhile effort for protecting youth enrolled in schools, but also that this approach could (and should) be expanded to incorporate other forms of behavior and other, more formal forms of discipline. Moreover, a lack of clearly defined punishment(s) for zero tolerance activities allowed for the social and criminological construction of implementing a myriad of sanctions for a wide variety of behaviors (Skiba and Knesting, 2001). While there have been numerous social and political instances that have influenced the overall growth of “zero tolerance” policies in schools and the growth of the “school-to-prison pipeline” type of punishments (e.g., the growth of gang violence in the early 1990s), it can be argued that no single instance holds greater influence on these policies than the Columbine school shooting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Advancement Project (2005) Education on Lockdown: The Schoolhouse to Jailhouse Track (Washington, DC: Advancement Project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Advancement Project (2007) Youth Speak Out on the School-to-Prison Pipeline (Washington, DC: Advancement Project).

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force (2008) “Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations”, American Psychologist, 63 (9), 852–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aull IV, E. H. (2012) “Zero Tolerance, Frivolous Juvenile Court Referrals, and the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Using Arbitration as a Screening-Out Method to Help Plug the Pipeline”, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 27, 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C. (2011) On Crimes and Punishments (Piscataway, NJ: Transaction).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. T. (1999). Social Theory: A Historical Introduction (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham, W. C., T. Abel and G. Lüschen (1993) “Max Weber, Formal Rationality, and Health Lifestyles”, The Sociological Quarterly, 34 (3), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, D. (2009) Columbine (New York: Hachette Book Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H. H. and C. W. Mills (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, T. (2011) “Keeping Kids in Schools: Restorative Justice, Punitive Discipline, and the School to Prison Pipeline”, Journal of Law and Education, 41 (2), 281–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (2002) “Does the Death of the Sociology of Deviance Claim Make Sense?”, The American Sociologist, 33 (3), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, V. (2009) “Early Twentieth Century Management Theories and Models That Shaped Twenty-First Century Leadership”, Journal of Philosophy & History of Education, 59, 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. and T. B. Lawrence (2005) “The Iron Cage in the Information Age: The Legacy and Relevance of Max Weber for Organizational Studies”, Editorial, Organization Studies, 26 (4), 493–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaviside, S., C. Rowand, C. Williams and E. Farris (1998) Violence and Discipline Problems in U.S. Public Schools: 1996–97 (NCES 98–030) (Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inverarity, J. M., P. Lauderdale and B. Feld (1983) Law and Society: Sociological Perspectives on Criminal Law (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, D. G. (1974) Weber (London: Fontana Collins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. and D. Walczak (1988) “Rationalization and the Deprofessionalization of Physicians”, Social Forces, 67 (1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, B. B. (1956). “A Code of Ethics Is Born”. The Clearing House, 31 (2), 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub, Jr., G. (2004) “Deterrence, Compellence, and Prospect Theory”, Political Psychology, 25 (3), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J. and K. Knesting (2001) “Zero Tolerance, Zero Evidence: An Analysis of School Disciplinary Practice”, in R. J. Skiba and G. G. Noam (eds.) New Directions for Youth Development (No. 92: Zero Tolerance: Can Suspension and Expulsion Keep Schools Safe?) (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J. and M. K. Rausch (2006) “Zero Tolerance, Suspension, and Expulsion: Questions of Equity and Effectiveness”, in C. M. Evertson and C. S. Weinstein (eds.) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, J. S. and W. E. Moore (1987) “Weber’s Analysis of Legal Rationalization: A Critique and Constructive Modification”, Sociological Forum, 2 (1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, C. (1994) The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Appleseed (2007) Texas’ School to Prison Pipeline — Dropout to Incarceration: The Impact of School Discipline and Zero Tolerance (Austin, TX: Texas Appleseed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiryakian, E. A. (1981) “The Sociological Import of a Metaphor: Tracking the Source of Max Weber’s ‘Iron Cage’”, Sociological Forum, 51 (1), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D. M. (1972) “Max Weber on the Law and the Rise of Capitalism”, The Yale Law Journal, 82 (1), 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, T. Parsons (trans.) (London: Unwin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, A. N. Henderson and Talcott Parsons (trans.) (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. (2013) “16-Year-Old Florida Honor Student Charged with Two Felonies for Doing a Science Experiment”, Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com/kiera-wilmot-arrested-for-science-explosion-2013-5, date accessed May 2, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. R. and J. P. Gibbs (1981) “Deterrence and Knowledge of Statutory Penalties”, The Sociological Quarterly, 22 (4), 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Scott Wm. Bowman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowman, S.W. (2014). The School-to-Prison Pipeline and the “Death of Deviance” in the American Public School System. In: The Death and Resurrection of Deviance. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303806_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics