Skip to main content
  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

In the last ten years, commodity-derivatives markets underwent major changes in at least two areas: (1) the amount of money invested, and (2) the types of investors. An important source of information is provided by the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), which releases weekly data on the investment positions held by the different types of traders on the US commodity-derivatives markets.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. W. Masters (2009), “Testimony before the commodity futures trading commission”, technical report, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (retrieved: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@newsroom/documents/file/hearing080509_masters.pdf), and Scott H. Irwina and Dwight R. Sandersb (2011 revised), “Testing the masters hypothesis in commodity futures markets, Energy Economics 34(1): 256–269 (retrieved: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/sites/default/files/mastershypothesis_0.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Radetzki (2008), A Handbook of Primary Commodities in the Global Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. R. K. Kaufmann (2011), “The role of market fundamentals and speculation in recent price changes for crude oil”, Energy Policy 39(1): 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See also, B. W. Brorsen (2012), “Discussion: Agricultural commodities and agribusiness stocks as financial assets”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44(3): 397–399.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Zapata, J. D. Detre, and T. Hanabuchi (2012), “Historical performance of commodity and stock markets”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44: 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Schnitkey and C. Kramer (2012), “Performance of publically-traded agricultural companies since 2000: Construction of the AgIndex”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44: 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. H. Irwin and D. R. Sanders (2012), “Financialization and structural change in commodity futures markets”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44: 371–396.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. H. Irwin and D. R. Sanders (2011), “Index funds, financialization, and commodity futures markets”, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. H. Lence (2009), “Do futures benefit farmers?”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(1): 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Carter (1984), “An evaluation of pricing performance and hedging effectiveness of the barley futures market”, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 9(1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. G. Castelino (1989), “Basis volatility: Implications for hedging”, Journal of Financial Research 12(2): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Fama (1970), “Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work”, Journal of Finance 25(2): 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Gray (1961), “The search for a risk premium”, Journal of Political Economy, 69(3): 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. H. Cootner (1960), “Returns to speculators: Telser versus Keynes”, Journal of Political Economy 68(4): 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. R. Sanders and M. R. Manfredo (2004), “Comparing hedging effectiveness: An application of the encompassing principle”, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(1): 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Lien and Y. K. Tse (2002), “Some recent developments in futures hedging”, Journal of Economic Surveys 16(3): 357–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Luc Nijs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nijs, L. (2014). Commodities I: Derivatives Markets. In: The Handbook of Global Agricultural Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302342_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics