Abstract
The history of the Soviet Union, and particularly that of political repression, is a key political issue in Russia. The figure of Stalin has deeply divided the population. This certainly explains why the memo-rialization of mass repression in Russia remains limited. Far from being encouraged by the state, specific initiatives have been the work of isolated individuals and associations, such as Memorial, a historical and human rights society. Following the interest generated by Stalinist history in the 1980s and early 1990s, the general attitude of the population today seems to be characterized not so much by oblivion, but by a certain indifference.1 In this context, as the Russian Orthodox Church was accused during the collapse of the Soviet Union of having compromised its principles with the Soviet regime, the church has progressively become the principal official actor in the process of memorialization. Some of the political ideas that are mobilized by the church are to a great extent in line with what the elites and an important part of Russian society are ready to accept about the past.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. Daucé, M. Désert, M. Laruelle, A. Le Huérou and K. Rousselet (2010) ‘Les usages pratiques du patriotisme en Russie’, Questions de recherche, 32, http://www.ceri-sciencespo.com/publica/question/qdr32.pdf.
I. Garkavy (2006) ‘Khramy na Krovi v traditsiakh drevnerusskoi memorial’noi kul’tury XI–XVII vekov’, Nyne i prisno, 3–4: 201–16.
C. Giordano (2001) ‘Gérer l’exemplarité en (re)mettant l’histoire à jour: les saints, les héros et les victimes’, in P. Centlivres (ed.), Saints, sainteté et martyre: actes du colloque de Neuchâtel (Neuchâtel: Editions de l’Institut d’ethnologie, Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme), pp. 121–32.
L. Golovkova (2004) Butovski Poligon [The Butovo Polygon] (Moscow: Al’zo).
S. Lefranc (2007) ‘La consécration d’un pis-aller: une genèse des politiques de réconciliation’, in G. Mink and L. Neumayer (eds), L’Europe et ses passés douloureux (Paris: La Découverte), pp. 233–46.
G. Mink and P. Bonnard (eds) (2010) Le passé au présent. Gisements mémoriels et actions historicisantes en Europe centrale et orientale (Paris: Michel Houdiard).
A. Roginski (2009) ‘Mémoire du stalinisme’, Le Débat, 3: 119–30.
K. Rousselet (2007) ‘Butovo: la création d’un lieu de pélerinage sur une terre de massacres’, Politix, 77: 55–78.
K. Rousselet (2008) ‘Les mémoires de la Grande Terreur: Butovo’, in M.-C. Maurel and F. Mayer (eds), L’Europe et ses représentations du passé. Les tourments de la mémoire (Paris: L’Harmattan), pp. 131–45.
K. Rousselet (2011a) ‘L’Eglise orthodoxe russe et la mémorialisation des répres-sions à la période soviétique: de la victime au héros’, in D. El Kenz and F.-X. Nérard (eds), Commémorer les victimes en Europe: XVIe–XXIe siècles (Paris: Champ Vallon), pp. 183–96.
K. Rousselet (2011b) ‘Constructing moralities around the Tsarist family’, in J. Zigon (ed.), Multiple Moralities and Religions in Post-Soviet Russia (New York: Berghahn books), pp. 146–67.
J. Young (1993) ‘Ecrire le monument: site, mémoire, critique’, Annales, 48(3): 729–43.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Kathy Rousselet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rousselet, K. (2013). The Russian Orthodox Church and Reconciliation with the Soviet Past. In: Mink, G., Neumayer, L. (eds) History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302052_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302052_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34638-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30205-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)