Abstract
The nature and implications of military service have been extensively debated in recent years. While since the end of the Cold War non-state conflicts have become more prominent, the period from the French revolutionary levée en masse in 1793 to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 has often been depicted as one in which the mass, largely conscripted and nationally defined army provided the model for military mobilization. Indeed, until the 1990s, the history of military mobilization was traditionally treated in a fairly linear fashion. Professional and limited in size, the armies of the ancien régime were essentially drawn from the two opposite ends of the social scale and often incorporated mercenaries from foreign lands or relied on additional battalions hired from other states. Conversely, twentieth-century armies were large, mostly based on systematic conscription, and rooted in ideas of the national state, in whose service citizens were obliged, or at least encouraged, to fight. The exact starting point of the transition from the former to the latter is disputed. Let us first of all examine the evolution of mass recruitment from within the territories of states. Peter the Great introduced an early form of conscription in Russia in 1705.1 There were also eighteenth-century attempts to widen military service in Prussia. These arose from a particular conjunction of factors. A small population and a financially poor state created difficulties for an ambitious monarchy, trying to expand its territories in a region without natural frontiers and exposed to greater powers. The only way for Prussia — and for other German states that followed suit — to compete militarily was to compel military service.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. M. Nikolaieff, ‘Universal Military Service in Russia and Western Europe’, Russian Review, 8, no. 2 (1949), pp. 117–18.
See, for example, Hew Strachan, European Armies and the Conduct of War (London and New York, 1992), pp. 4, 40.
Carl von Clausewitz, On War (London, 1968), pp. 384–5.
George L. Mosse, Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars (Oxford, 1990), pp. 18–19.
Russell F. Weigley, The Age of Battles: The Quest for Decisive Warfare from Breitenfeld to Waterloo (Bloomington, 1991), p. 290.
David A. Bell, The First Total War: Napoleon’s Europe and the Birth of Modern Warfare (London, 2008), pp. 160, 184, 190–91, 207, 310–11, 316.
Geoffrey Best, War and Society in Revolutionary Europe 1770–1870 (Leicester, 1982), p. 65.
Deborah Avant, ‘From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War’, International Organization, 54, no. 1 (2000), pp. 41–72, esp. 68.
Arthur Waldron, ‘Looking Backward: The People in Arms and the Transformation of War’, in D. Moran and A. Waldron (eds), The People in Arms: Military Myth and National Mobilization since the French Revolution (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 256–62.
Ute Planert, ‘Innovation or Evolution? The French Wars in Military History’, in Roger Chickering and Stig Förster (eds), War in an Age of Revolution, 1775–1815 (Cambridge, 2010), pp. 69–84.
John King Fairbank and Merle Goldman, China: A New History (London, 2001), pp. 109–10;
Morton H. Fried, ‘Military Status in Chinese Society’, American Journal of Sociology, 57, no. 4 (1952), p. 348;
Peter Hays Gries, ‘Narratives to Live By: The Century of Humiliation and Chinese National Identity Today’, in Lionel M. Jensen and Timothy B. Weston (eds), China’s Transformations: The Stories Beyond the Headlines (Plymouth, 2007), p. 116.
Cited in: Christine G. Krüger and Sonja Levsen, ‘Introduction: Volunteers, War, and the Nation since the French Revolution’, in C. G. Krüger and S. Levsen (eds), War Volunteering in Modern Times: From the French Revolution to the Second World War (Basingstoke, 2011), p. 12.
Janice E. Thomson, ‘International Norms and the Decline of Mercenarism’, International Studies Quarterly, 34, no. 1 (1990), pp. 23–47. Sarah Percy also identifies the gradual emergence of an international norm against mercenary use, though she argues that the negative image of mercenarism began to develop already in the Middle Ages.
Sarah Percy, Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations (New York, 2007).
Tarak Barkawi, ‘State and Armed Force in International Context’, in Alejandro Colás and Bryan Mabee (eds), Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empire (London, 2010), pp. 33–43.
Matthew Brown, Adventuring through Spanish Colonies: Simón Bolívar, Foreign Mercenaries and the Birth of New Nations (Liverpool, 2006).
See, for example: William St. Clair, That Greece Might Still Be Free: The Philhellenes in the War of Independence (London, 1972);
David McLean, ‘Garibaldi in Uruguay: A Reputation Reconsidered’, The English Historical Review, 113, no. 451 (1998), pp. 351–66.
See, for example: Reinhard Nachtigal, ‘The Repatriation and Reception of Returning Prisoners of War, 1918–22’, Immigrants & Minorities, 26, no. 1 (2008), pp. 157–84;
Mark Mazower, Hitler’s Empire (London, 2008), pp. 461–70;
Catherine Andreyev, Vlasov and the Russian Liberation Movement (Cambridge, 1987), esp. pp. 35–7, 52, 201.
Jean-Luc Leleu, ‘From the Nazi Party’s Shock Troop to the “European” Mass Army: The Waffen-SS Volunteers’, in C. G. Krüger and S. Levsen (eds), War Volunteering, pp. 231–47; George H. Stein, The Waffen SS (Ithaca, 1966), pp. 168–96.
Lynne Olson and Stanley Cloud, For Your Freedom and Ours: The Kos´ciuszko Squadron, Forgotten Heroes of World War II (London, 2004);
Christopher E. Goscha, ‘Building Forces: Asian Origins of Twentieth-Century Military Science in Vietnam (1905–1954)’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34, no. 3 (2003), pp. 546–50.
Douglas M. Peers, Between Mars and Mammon: Colonial Armies and the Garrison State in Early Nineteenth-century India (London, 1995), pp. 257.
Roger Norman Buckley, Slaves in Red Coats: The British West India Regiments, 1795– 1815 (New Haven, 1979), pp. 7–8, 52–56.
David Omissi, Indian Voices of the Great War (Basingstoke, 1999), p. 12.
Edward M. Spiers (ed), Sudan: The Conquest Re-Appraised (Abingdon, 1998), pp. 43, 65.
Jaap de Moor, ‘The Recruitment of Indonesian Soldiers for the Dutch Colonial Army, c. 1700–1950’, in D. Killingray and D. Omissi (eds), Guardians of Empire (Manchester, 1999), pp. 53–69.
Nir Arielli, Fascist Italy and the Middle East, 1933–40 (Basingstoke, 2010), p. 67.
Stephen M. Miller, ‘British and Imperial Volunteers in the South African War’, in C. G. Krüger and S. Levsen (eds), War Volunteering, pp. 109–21; Peter Dennis and Jeffrey Grey (eds), The Boer War: Army, Nation and Empire (Canberra, 2000).
See for example, Joshua Goldstein, War and Gender (Cambridge, 2004), p. 161.
A. Wimmer and N. Glick Schiller, ‘Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences’, Global Networks, 2, no. 4 (2002), pp. 301–34.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Nir Arielli and Bruce Collins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arielli, N., Collins, B. (2013). Introduction: Transnational Military Service since the Eighteenth Century. In: Arielli, N., Collins, B. (eds) Transnational Soldiers. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296634_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296634_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34012-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29663-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)