Abstract
For centuries, we have been puzzled by the question of if and to what extent war and morality might be accommodated, and if it makes sense to talk about justice and war in one and the same context in the first place. According to the traditional, realist understanding of organized violence, war is in many respects a situation of emergency in which military necessity overrules morality and in which proportionality sets out the furthest point we can go in facilitating moral norms and brutal warfare. From this starting point, even if war may not be an amoral enterprise altogether, its morality is drastically limited by military and political ends. At the same time, the just war tradition has always been interested in accommodating war and morality; the proponents of just war have throughout history maintained that war is not outside the sphere of deeper ethical evaluation, and that we can, and morally ought to, apply more than the basic principles of necessity and proportionality when we judge the ways in which war is waged. Even in an extreme situation of emergency such as war we are aware of right and wrong, just and unjust, and ought to act accordingly (for the development of just war thinking, see, e.g., Johnson 1984; Nardin 1996; Rengger 2002; Bellamy 2006).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allan, P. and A. Keller (eds.) (2006). What Is a Just Peace? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arneil, B. (2002). ‘Becoming versus Being: A Critical Analysis of the Child in Liberal Theory,’ in David Archard and Colin M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–96.
Baier, K. (1991a). ‘Types of Responsibility,’ in Peter A. French (ed.), The Spectrum of Responsibility. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 117–122.
Baier, K. (1991b). ‘Guilt and Responsibility,’ in Larry May and Stacey Hoffman (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc., pp. 197–217.
Bellamy, A. (2006). Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq. London: Polity Press.
Brown, C. (2010). Practical Judgment in International Politics: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.
Bull, H. (1979). ‘Review: Recapturing the Just War for Political Theory,’ World Politics 31(4): 588–599.
Cochran, M. (2009). ‘Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” Is there in a Middle Ground Ethics’? International Studies Quarterly 53: 203–25.
Cohen, M. (1985). ‘Moral Scepticism and International Relations,’ in C. R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds.), International Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–52.
Crawford, N. (2007). ‘Individual and Collective Moral Responsibility for Systemic Military Atrocity,’ Journal of Political Philosophy 15(2): 187–212.
Drumbl, M. (2012). Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ehlstain, J. B. (ed.) (1991). Just War Theory. New York: New York University Press.
Evans, M. (2005). ‘Moral Theory and the Idea of a Just War,’ in M. Evans (ed.), Just War Theory. A Reappraisal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–21.
Govier, T. (2008). ‘War’s Aftermath: The Challenge of Reconciliation,’ in Larry May (ed.), War. Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–48.
Johnson, J. T. (1984). Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Linklater, A. (2002). ‘The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Implications for the Sociology of State-Systems,’ International Affairs 78(2): 319–38.
Linklater, A. (2006). ‘The Harm Principle and Global Ethics,’ Global Society 20(3): 329–43.
Linklater, A. and H. Suganami (2006). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mavrodes, G. I. (1985) ‘Conventions and the Morality of War,’ in Charles R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds), International Ethics: A Philosophy & Public Affairs Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 75–89.
McMahan, J. (1994). ‘Innocence, Self-Defence and Killing in War,’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 2(3): 193–221.
McMahan, J. (2004). ‘The Ethics of Killing in War,’ Ethics 114: 693–733.
McMahan, J. (2008). ‘The Morality of War and the Law of War,’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–43.
McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nagel, T. (1985). ‘War and Massacre,’ in Charles R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds.) International Ethics. A Philosophy & Public Affairs Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 53–89.
Nardin, T. (ed.) (1996). The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rengger, N. (2002). ‘On the Just War Tradition in the Twenty-First Century,’ International Affairs 78(2): 353–63.
Rodin, D. (2004). War and Self-Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rodin, D. (2008). ‘The Moral Inequality of Soldiers: Why jus in bello Asymmetry is Half Right,’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–68.
Rosen, D. (2005). Armies of the Young: Child Soldiers in War and Terrorism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Schapiro, T. (2003). ‘Childhood and Personhood,’ Arizona Law Review 45: 575–94.
Shue, H. (2008). ‘Do We Need a “Morality of War”?’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–111.
Singer, P. W. (2005). Children at War. New York: Pantheon Books.
Vaha, M. (2011). ‘Child Soldiers and Killing in Self-Defence: Challenging the “Moral View” on Killing in War,’ Journal of Military Ethics 10(1): 36–51.
Walzer, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.
Walzer, M. (2004). ‘Two Kinds of Military Responsibility,’ in Michael Walzer (ed.), Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 23–32.
Walzer, M. (2006). Thick and Thin: A Moral Argument Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wasserstrom, R. (1991). ‘Conduct and Responsibility in War,’ in Larry May and Stacey Hoffman (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc., pp. 179–96.
Williams, H. (2012). Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Milla Emilia Vaha
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaha, M.E. (2013). The Ethics of War, Innocence, and Hard Cases: A Call for the Middle Ground. In: Navari, C. (eds) Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45066-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29096-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)