Skip to main content

The Ethics of War, Innocence, and Hard Cases: A Call for the Middle Ground

  • Chapter
Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations ((PSIR))

Abstract

For centuries, we have been puzzled by the question of if and to what extent war and morality might be accommodated, and if it makes sense to talk about justice and war in one and the same context in the first place. According to the traditional, realist understanding of organized violence, war is in many respects a situation of emergency in which military necessity overrules morality and in which proportionality sets out the furthest point we can go in facilitating moral norms and brutal warfare. From this starting point, even if war may not be an amoral enterprise altogether, its morality is drastically limited by military and political ends. At the same time, the just war tradition has always been interested in accommodating war and morality; the proponents of just war have throughout history maintained that war is not outside the sphere of deeper ethical evaluation, and that we can, and morally ought to, apply more than the basic principles of necessity and proportionality when we judge the ways in which war is waged. Even in an extreme situation of emergency such as war we are aware of right and wrong, just and unjust, and ought to act accordingly (for the development of just war thinking, see, e.g., Johnson 1984; Nardin 1996; Rengger 2002; Bellamy 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, P. and A. Keller (eds.) (2006). What Is a Just Peace? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneil, B. (2002). ‘Becoming versus Being: A Critical Analysis of the Child in Liberal Theory,’ in David Archard and Colin M. Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K. (1991a). ‘Types of Responsibility,’ in Peter A. French (ed.), The Spectrum of Responsibility. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K. (1991b). ‘Guilt and Responsibility,’ in Larry May and Stacey Hoffman (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc., pp. 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. (2006). Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2010). Practical Judgment in International Politics: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1979). ‘Review: Recapturing the Just War for Political Theory,’ World Politics 31(4): 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, M. (2009). ‘Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” Is there in a Middle Ground Ethics’? International Studies Quarterly 53: 203–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. (1985). ‘Moral Scepticism and International Relations,’ in C. R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds.), International Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. (2007). ‘Individual and Collective Moral Responsibility for Systemic Military Atrocity,’ Journal of Political Philosophy 15(2): 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drumbl, M. (2012). Reimagining Child Soldiers in International Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlstain, J. B. (ed.) (1991). Just War Theory. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2005). ‘Moral Theory and the Idea of a Just War,’ in M. Evans (ed.), Just War Theory. A Reappraisal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (2008). ‘War’s Aftermath: The Challenge of Reconciliation,’ in Larry May (ed.), War. Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. T. (1984). Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (2002). ‘The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Implications for the Sociology of State-Systems,’ International Affairs 78(2): 319–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. (2006). ‘The Harm Principle and Global Ethics,’ Global Society 20(3): 329–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A. and H. Suganami (2006). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrodes, G. I. (1985) ‘Conventions and the Morality of War,’ in Charles R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds), International Ethics: A Philosophy & Public Affairs Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (1994). ‘Innocence, Self-Defence and Killing in War,’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 2(3): 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (2004). ‘The Ethics of Killing in War,’ Ethics 114: 693–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (2008). ‘The Morality of War and the Law of War,’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (2009). Killing in War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1985). ‘War and Massacre,’ in Charles R. Beitz, M. Cohen, T. Scanlan, and A. J. Simmons (eds.) International Ethics. A Philosophy & Public Affairs Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, T. (ed.) (1996). The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2002). ‘On the Just War Tradition in the Twenty-First Century,’ International Affairs 78(2): 353–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, D. (2004). War and Self-Defence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, D. (2008). ‘The Moral Inequality of Soldiers: Why jus in bello Asymmetry is Half Right,’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. (2005). Armies of the Young: Child Soldiers in War and Terrorism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, T. (2003). ‘Childhood and Personhood,’ Arizona Law Review 45: 575–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H. (2008). ‘Do We Need a “Morality of War”?’ in David Rodin and Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. W. (2005). Children at War. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaha, M. (2011). ‘Child Soldiers and Killing in Self-Defence: Challenging the “Moral View” on Killing in War,’ Journal of Military Ethics 10(1): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (2004). ‘Two Kinds of Military Responsibility,’ in Michael Walzer (ed.), Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (2006). Thick and Thin: A Moral Argument Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstrom, R. (1991). ‘Conduct and Responsibility in War,’ in Larry May and Stacey Hoffman (eds.), Collective Responsibility: Five Decades of Debate in Theoretical and Applied Ethics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publ. Inc., pp. 179–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (2012). Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Milla Emilia Vaha

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vaha, M.E. (2013). The Ethics of War, Innocence, and Hard Cases: A Call for the Middle Ground. In: Navari, C. (eds) Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics