Skip to main content

The Pursuit of Global Political Justice, or, What’s Global Democracy For?

  • Chapter
New Waves in Global Justice

Part of the book series: New Waves in Philosophy ((NWIP))

  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

Some recent treatments of cosmopolitan democracy have focused on the feasibility of actually achieving global political justice, or a defensibly participatory form of shared rule at the global level. Commentators have explored whether there are decisive reasons to think that binding global democracy would be impossible to achieve, and if it is not impossible, the means by which both global institutions and a global demos might be constructed (List and Koenig-Archibugi 2010; Koenig-Archibugi 2012a). For clues, they have looked to the historical development of domestic liberal democracy (Goodin 2010), as well as to more recent transitions to democracy within states (Koenig-Archibugi 2011), and to potential ‘paths and agents’ to global democracy that are emerging in the current global system (Held and Archibugi 2011). Each of these investigations has offered important insights into which lessons from domestic democratic transitions might be transposed upward, adding an important empirical element to the mostly normative and prescriptive literature on global democracy and global political justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’, Political Theory 36(1): 37–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abizadeh, Arash. 2012. ‘On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem’, American Political Science Review, advance online, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele. 2008. The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele. 2012. ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy: A Restatement’, Cambridge Journal of Education 42(1): 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Daniel. 2011. ‘The European Union and Africa: Trade Liberalisation, Constructive Disengagement, and the Securitisation of Europe’s External Frontiers’, Africa Review 3(1): 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Luis. 2007. ‘The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy’, Ethics & International Affairs 21(2): 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Luis. 2010. The Practice of Global Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, Luis. 2013. ‘Supranational Institutions and the Democratic Boundary Problem’, Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly. 2013a. ‘Appeal for the Establishment of a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations’. Online: http://en.unpacampaign.org/appeal/index.php.

  • Campaign for a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly. 2013b. ‘About the Campaign’. Online: http://en.unpacampaign.org/about/index.php.

  • Caney, Simon. 2006a. ‘Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design: An Egalitarian Liberal Conception of Global Governance’. Social Theory and Practice 32(4): 725–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, Simon. 2006b. ‘Global Justice: From Theory to Practice’, Globalizations 3(2): 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, Simon. 2007a. ‘Justice, Borders, and the Cosmopolitan Ideal: A Reply to Two Critics’, Journal of Global Ethics 3: 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caney, Simon. 2007b. ‘Egalitarian Liberalism and Universalism’, in Anthony Simon Laden and David Owen (eds), Multiculturalism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua, and Charles F. Sabel. 2005. ‘Global Democracy?’ NYU Journal of Law and Politics 37(4): 763–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S., André Bächtiger and Karolina Milewicz. 2011. ‘Toward a Deliberative Global Citizens’ Assembly’, Global Policy 2(1): 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund, David M. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europa. 2013. ‘Enlargement: Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance: Turkey’. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/instruments/funding-by-country/ turkey/index_en.htm.

  • Falk, Richard, and Andrew Strauss. 2001. ‘Toward Global Parliament’, Foreign Affairs 80(1): 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, Richard, and Andrew Strauss. 2011. A Global Parliament: Essays and Articles. Berlin: Committee for a Democratic UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, Andreas. 2012. ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy: Neither a Category Mistake nor a Categorical Imperative’, in Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and Raffaele Marchetti (eds), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, Andreas, and Simon Hix. 2006. ‘Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Vicente. 2007. A Revolution of Hope: The Life, Faith, and Dreams of a Mexican President. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2008. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2012. ‘Freedom in the World 2012: The Arab Uprisings and their Global Repercussions’. Online: http://www.freedomhouse.org/article/freedom-world-2012-arab-uprisings-and-their-global-repercussions.

  • Gilabert, Pablo. 2012. From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, Michael. 2011. ‘World State and Global Democracy’, in Luis Cabrera (ed.), Global Governance, Global Government: Institutional Visions for an Evolving World System. Albany: SUNY Press, 183–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert. 2007. ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 35(1): 40–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E. 2010. ‘Global Democracy: In the Beginning’, International Theory 2(2): 175–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Carol. 2004. Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Carol. 2010. ‘Structuring Global Democracy: Political Communities, Universal Rights and Transnational Representation’, in Ronald Tinnevelt and Helder De Schutter (eds), Global Democracy and Exclusion. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Carol. 2012. ‘Regional Versus Global Democracy: Advantages and Limitations’, in Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and Raffaele Marchetti (eds), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David. 2004. Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, and Daniele Archibugi. 2011. “Cosmopolitan Democracy: Paths and Agents,” Ethics & International Affairs 25(4): 433–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2011. ‘Is Global Democracy Possible?’ European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 519–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2012a. ‘Global Democracy and Domestic Analogies’, in Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and Raffaele Marchetti (eds), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. 2012b. ‘Fuzzy Citizenship in Global Society’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(4): 456–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, Christian, and Mathias Koenig-Archibugi. 2010. ‘Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 38(1): 76–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley, J.P., P. Aspe, W.F. Weld, T.P. D. Aquino, A. Rozental, and R. A. Pastor. 2005. Building a North American Community. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Raffaele. 2008a. Global Democracy, For and Against: Ethical Theory, Institutional Design, and Social Struggles. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Raffaele. 2008b. ‘A Matter of Drawing Boundaries: Global Democracy and International Exclusion’, Review of International Studies 34: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moellendorf, Danel. 2009. Global Inequality Matters. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Näsström, Sofia. 2007. ‘The Legitimacy of the People’, Political Theory 35(5): 624–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näsström, Sofia. 2011. “The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle,” Political Studies 59(1): 116–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, James W. 2007. Making Sense of Human Rights, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaidis, Kalypso, and Robert Howse. 2002. ‘This is my EUtopia...Narrative as Power’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 767–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 1995. ‘Three Problems with Contractarian-Consequentialist Ways of Assessing Social Institutions’, Social Philosophy and Policy 12(2): 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2009. ‘Shue on Rights and Duties’, in Charles Beitz and Robert Goodin (eds), Global Basic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, Christian. 2009. ‘On Rights and Institutions’, in Charles Beitz and Robert Goodin (eds), Global Basic Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, Berthold. 2012. ‘Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (S1): 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzberg, Joseph. 2012. Creating a World Parliamentary Assembly: An Evolutionary Journey. Berlin: Committee for a Democratic UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglow, Jonathan. 2005. ‘The Ethics of Immigration’, Political Studies Review 3(3): 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1999. ‘Democracy as a Universal Value’, Journal of Democracy 10(3): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, revised edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rogers M. 2008. ‘The Principle of Constituted Identities and the Obligation to Include’, Ethics & Global Politics 1(3): 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, William. 2005. Which Rights Should Be Universal? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Kok-Chor. 2012. Justice, Institutions and Luck: The Site, Ground and Scope of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tännsjö, Torbjöm. 2008. Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Barbara, and Saul H. Mendlovitz (eds). 2003. A Reader on Second Assembly & Parliamentary Proposals. Wayne, NJ: Center for UN Reform Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ypi, Lea. 2010. ‘Basic Rights and Cosmopolitan Justice from an Enlightened Localist Perspective’, Comparative Sociology 9(5): 594–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Luis Cabrera

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cabrera, L. (2014). The Pursuit of Global Political Justice, or, What’s Global Democracy For?. In: Brooks, T. (eds) New Waves in Global Justice. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286406_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics