Abstract
Before we can even begin to answer the question of whether Hayek was an Austrian economist, we must justify asking it in the first place. For, the reaction to the title of this chapter from some quarters is likely to be, “Who cares?” However, there are several good and sufficient reasons for caring. First of all, Hayek made important contributions to the dismal science.1 Any analysis that delves into his input to economics cannot help be of interest. Second, one of the basic elements of science, including social science, is categorization. It would be too extreme to say that biology and chemistry consist of nothing but classification, but the separation of flora and fauna into genus and species (in the former) and into the periodic table of the elements (in the latter) surely constitute a large part of the study of these two fields. Why should the history of economic thought be any different? Milton Friedman (Ebeling, 2006) has stated that there is only good economics and bad economics; i.e., that there are no distinct schools of thought. But this is a performative contradiction (Hoppe, 1993, 204–207; Kinsella, 2002) if ever there was one, as the statement is belied by the fact that this economist was for many years himself the leader of the Chicago School of Economics. No, Friedman to the contrary notwithstanding, there are schools of thought,2 and if we want to throw more light on the discipline, it behooves us to study it from many, many angles; including, certainly, the one now being undertaken in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnett, WilliamII and Walter Block. 2008A. “Economic Singularism.” Research in the History of Economic Thought & Methodology. Vol. 26-A, pp. 15–30.
Barnett, William and Walter Block. 2008B. “Economic categorization.” Laissez-Faire, Issue 28–29, March–September, pp. 4–12; http://fce.ufm.edu/Publicaciones/LaissezFaire/
Batemarco, Robert. 1985. “Positive Economics and Praxeology: The Clash of Prediction and Explanation,” Atlantic Economic Journal, July, 13(2), pp. 31–27.
Becker, Gary. 1995. “It’s simple: Hike the minimum wage, and you put people out of work,” Business Week, Mar 6. p. 22.
Birner, Jack. 1995. “The surprising place of cognitive psychology in the work of F.A. Hayek.” Maastricht: METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization in its series. Research Memoranda; number 019; http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/umamet/1995019.html
Blanchard III, James U. 1984. “Exclusive Interview with F. A. Hayek,” Cato Policy Report, vol. VI, no. 3, May/June; http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/cpr6n3-hayek.html
Block, Walter and Garschina, Kenneth M. 1996. “Hayek, Business Cycles and Fractional Reserve Banking: Continuing the De-Homoginization Process,” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1995, pp. 77–94; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_1_3.pdf
Block, Walter and Paul Cwik. 2007. “Teaching Business Ethics: A Classificationist Approach,” Business Ethics: A European Review. Vol. 16, No. 2 April, pp. 98–107; http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/beer/16/2
Block, Walter, Christopher Westley and Alex Padilla. 2008. “Internal vs. external explanations: a new perspective on the history of economic thought,” Procesos De Mercado: Revista Europea De Economia Politica; issue 2, pp. 35–132.
Block, Walter. 1973. “A Comment on ‘The Extraordinary Claim of Praxeology’ by Professor Gutierrez,” Theory and Decision, June, 3(4), pp.377–387.
Block, Walter. 1980. “On Robert Nozick’s ‘On Austrian Methodology’,” Inquiry, Vol. 23, No. 4, Fall, pp. 397–444.
Block, Walter. 1999. “Austrran Theorizing: Recalling the Foundatrons,” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 2, No. 4, Winter, pp. 21–39.
Buchanan, James M. 1969. Cost and Choice: An Inquiry into Economic Theory, Chicago: Markham.
Buchanan, James M. and G.F. Thirlby. 1981. L.S.E. Essays on Cost, New York: New York University Press.
Ebeling, Rrchard. 1992. “Introduction.” In Richard Ebeling, ed. The Global Failure of Socialism. Hillsdale, MI: Hillsdale College Press, pp. 6–8.
Ebeling, Richard. 2006. “Milton Friedman and the Chicago School of Economics” The Freeman. December, Vol. 56, No. 10; http://www.thefreemanonline.org/from-the-president/milton-friedman-and-the-chicago-school-of-economics/
Fleetwood, Steve. 1995. Hayek’s Political Economy: The Socio-Economics of Order; Routledge.
Fox, Glenn. 1992. “The Pricing of Environmental Goods: A Praxeological Critique of Contingent Valuation,” Cultural Dynamics, Vol. V, No. 3, pp. 245–259.
Frantz, Roger (2012). Frederrck Hayek as a Behavioral Economist. In…..
Friedman, Milton. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; http://academic2.american.edu/-dfagel/Class%20Readings/Friedman/Methodology.pdf
Garrison, Roger W. 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.
Gordon, David. 2003. “Book review of Hayek’s political economy: the socio-economics of order. by Steve Fleetwood. Routledge. 1995,” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, Summer, 99–101.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1931. Prices and Production, London: Routledge.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1937. “Investment that raises the demand for capital” The Review of Economic Statistics, November, pp. 174–177; http://mises.org/daily/2477
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1999 [1952]. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Hayek, Friedrich. 1994
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue; Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Herbener, Jeffrey M. 1991. “Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School of Economics.” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 33–50; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae5_2_2.pdf
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1989. “In Defense of Extreme Rationalism: Thoughts on Donald McClosky’s The Rhetoric of Economics,” Review of Austrian Economics, 3, pp. 179–214.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1991. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol.2, No. 2; reprinted as
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1994. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism,” in Austrian Economics: Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future, Vol. 17, Richard M. Ebeling, ed., Hillsdale, MI: Hillsdale College Press, pp. 59–96.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1991. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol.2, No. 2; reprinted as
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1994. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism,” in Austrian Economics: Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future, Vol. 17, Richard M. Ebeling, ed., Hillsdale, MI: Hillsdale College Press, pp. 59–96.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1992. “On Praxeology and the Praxeological Foundation of Epistemology and Ethics,” Herbener, J., ed., The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises, Boston: Dordrecht.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1993. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 204–207.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1995. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute; http://www.mises.org/esandtam/pesl.asp; http://www.mises.org/esandtam/pfe3.asp; http://mises.org/pdf/esam.pdf http://mises.org/ESANDTAM/PESI.ASP; http://www.mises.org/esandtam/pfe3.asp
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2001. Democracy — The God That Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, Rutgers University, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 2006. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism” in The Economics and Ethics of Private Property: Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, 2nd, ed., pp. 347–379; Auburn AL: The Mises Institute http://72.14.253.104/u/Mises?q=cache:qTUMZOPf0H0J:www.mises.org/esandtam.asp+Hoppe+praxeology&h1=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8
Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1999. “Economic Science and Neoclassicism.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 2 Num. 4, pp. 1–20; http://www.mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae2_4_1.pdf
Kinsella, N. Stephan. 2002. “Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan,” Anti-state.com, Sept. 19; http://www.anti-state.com/article.php?article_id=312
Kirzner, Israel M. 1996. “Reflections on the Misesian Legacy in economics.” Review of Austrian Economics. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 143–154; http://mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/R92_8.pdf
Mises, Ludwig von. [1912] 1953. The Theory of Money and Credit [originally published in German in 1912]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mises, Ludwig von. 1969. Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.
Mises, Ludwig von. 1998 [1949]. Human Action: The Scholar’s Edition, Auburn, Ala.: The Mises Institute; http://www.mises.org/humanaction.asp
Mises, Ludwig von. 1998 [1949]. Human Action: The Scholar’s Edition, Auburn, Ala.: The Mises Institute; http://www.mises.org/humanaction.asp of order, by Steve Fleetwood. Routledge. 1995.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 6, no. 2, summer: 99–101; http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae6_2_4.pdf
Polleit, Thorsten. 2008. “Mises’s Apriorism Against Relativism in Economics.” April 25; http://blog.mises.org/archives/008051.asp
Rizzo, Mario. 1979. “Praxeology and Econometrics: A Critique of Positivist Economics,” New Directions in Austrian Economics, Louis Spadaro, ed., Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, pp. 40–56.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1951. “Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller.” American Economic Review, December.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1957. “In Defense of Extreme Apriorism,” Southern Economic Journal, January, 23(1), pp. 314–320.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1970. Power and Market: Government and the Economy, Menlo Park CA: Institute for Humane Studies.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1971. “Lange, Mises and Praxeology: The Retreat from Marxism.” Toward Liberty. Vol. II, Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies, pp. 307001E321. Reprinted in The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1997, pp. 384–396.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1973. “Praxeology and the Method of Economics,” Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, M. Natanson, ed., Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, vol. 2, pp. 311–342; and Austrian Economics: A Reader Vol. 18, Richard M. Ebeling, ed., Hillsdale, MI.: Hillsdale College Press, 1991, pp. 55–91.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1976. “l’raxeology: l he Methodology ot Austrian Economics,” in The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Edwin G. Dolan, ed., Kansas City: Sheed and Ward, pp. 19–39. http://www.econlib.org/library/NPDBooks/Dolan/dinFMAContents.html
Rothbard, Murray N. 1991. “The End of Socialism and the Calculation Debate Revisited.” The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 51–76. Reprinted in The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1997, pp. 408–437; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae5_2_3.pdf
Rothbard, Murray N. 1992. “The Present State of Austrian Economics.” Working Paper from the Ludwig von Mises Institute, November. Reprinted in The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1997, pp. 111–172. Reprinted in Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 6, No. 1 (March 1995), pp. 43–89.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1993. Man, Economy, and State, 2 vols., Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1997a. “Praxeology as the Method of the Social Sciences,” in The Logic of Action One. Murray N. Rothbard, ed., UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 28–57.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1997b. “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics,” in The Logic of Action One. Murray N. Rothbard, ed., UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 58–77.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1997c. “Praxeology, Value Judgments, and Public Policy,” in The Logic of Action One. Murray N. Rothbard, ed., UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.78–99.
Rothbard, Murray N. 1997d. “In Defense of ‘Extreme Apriorism’,” in The Logic of Action One. Murray N. Rothbard, ed., UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.100–108.
Salerno, Joseph T. 1990A. “Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist,” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 26–54; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae4_1_2.pdf
Salerno, Joseph T. 1990B. “Postscript: Why a Socialist Economy is Impossible,” in Ludwig von Mises, Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn AL: Praxeology Press, pp. 51–71.
Salerno, Joseph T. 1991. “Commentary: The Concept of Coordination in Austrian Macroeconomics,” in Richard M. Ebeling, ed., Austrian Economics, Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future. Champions of Freedom Series. Vol. 17. Hillsdale, Mich.: Hillsdale College Press.
Salerno, Joseph T. 1993. “Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized,” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 113–146; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae6_2_5.pdf
Salerno, Joseph T. 1994. “Reply to Leland B. Yeager on ‘Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge.’” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 113–146.
Salerno, Joseph T. 1995. “A Final Word: Calculation, Knowledge and Appraisement,” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 141–142; http://www.mises.org/journals/rae/pdf/rae9_1_8.pdf
Salerno, Joseph T. 2002. “Friedrich von Wieser and Friedrich A. Hayek: The General Equilibrium Tradition in Austrian Economics,” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 12, No. 2; http://www.bepress.com/jeeh/vol12/iss2/art11/
Selgin, George A. 1988. “Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics,” Review of Austrian Economics, (2), pp. 19–58; reprinted as Praxeology and Understanding, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990.
Sima, Josef. 2004. “Praxeology as law & economics.” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 18, no. 2, Spring, pp. 73–89; http://mises.org/journals/jls/18_2/18_2_5.pdf
Stalebrink, Odd J. 2004. “The Hayekand Mises Controversy: Bridging Differences.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring, pp. 27–38 Vol. 18, no. 2, Spring, pp. 73–89; http://mises.org/journals/jls/18_2/18_2_5.pdf
White, Lawrence H. 1998. “Methodology of the Austrian Economists, Friedrich A. Hayek; The Methodology of the Austrian School Economists”; http://mises.org/mofase/ch5.asp
Woods, Thomas E. Jr. 2009. Meltdown: A Free-Market Look at Why the Stock Market Collapsed, the Economy Tanked, and Government Bailouts Will Make Things Worse. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Walter E. Block
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Block, W.E. (2013). Was Hayek an Austrian Economist? Yes and No. Was Hayek a Praxeologist? No. In: Frantz, R., Leeson, R. (eds) Hayek and Behavioral Economics. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278159_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278159_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33683-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27815-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)