Summary
This chapter discusses the process of writing materials for publication, with a particular emphasis on what happens when the principles of the materials writer conflict in some respects with the views and wishes of other stakeholders in the process, such as publishers and education authorities. The chapter describes a particular instance of this process, outlining the key methodological principles of the materials writer and the difficulty of applying these principles in the light of feedback from the publishers. Specific examples are given of potentially problematic feedback from the publishers, along with examples of how the problems were negotiated. The main issue of the chapter is how far and on what basis we should attenuate principles we have drawn from language teaching research in response to the traditions, expectations, wishes, and constraints of a particular educational context. The chapter argues that in a discipline such as applied linguistics the views of practitioners and other stakeholders are a part of the theoretical equation and that some kind of compromise between research-based principles and local realities is, therefore, not only necessary but also desirable. For such compromise to be principled and constructive, however, we need a set of principles to help us to mediate between theory and practice in materials design. The chapter concludes by proposing some principles which might help us to achieve principled compromise rather than compromised principles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batstone, R. (1996). Key concepts in ELT: Noticing. ELT Journal, 50, 273.
Bell, J. and Gower, R. (2011). Writing materials for the world: A great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 131–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanič, R., Masuhara, H., and Tomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 57, 251–259.
Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. (1995a). Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. (1995b). An applied linguist in principle and practice. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour ofH.G. Widdowson (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cunningsworth, A. and Kusel, P. (1991). Evaluating teachers’ guides. ELT Journal, 45, 128–39.
Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
Gray J. (2000). The ELT coursebook as cultural artefact: How teachers censor and adapt. ELT journal, 54, 274–283.
Gray J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook;. Basingstoke: Pal grave Macmillan.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Harwood, N. (2010). Issues in materials development and design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice (pp. 3–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). The E of TESOL. Unpublished colloquium paper, TESOL, Salt Lake City.
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
Mares, C. (2003). Writing a coursebook. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 130–140). London: Continuum.
Mukundan, J. (2008). Agendas of the state in developing world English language textbooks. Folio, 12, 17–19.
Nitta, R. and Gardner, S. (2005). Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT journal, 59, 3–13.
Prabhu, N. (1990). There is no best method — why? TESOL Quarterly, 24, 161–176.
Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form — a myth in the making. ELT Journal, 57, 255–233.
Sinclair, J. (1990). Collins cobuild English grammar. London: HarperCollins.
Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing principled frameworks for materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 107–130). London: Continuum.
Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Patten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287–301.
Widdowson, H. (1989). Knowledge of language and ability for use. Applied Linguistics, 12, 128–137.
Willis, D. (2003). Rules, patterns and words: Grammar and lexis in ELT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waters, A. (2012). Trends and issues in ELT methods and methodology. ELT Journal, 66, 440–449.
Willis, J. and Willis, D. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Ivor Timmis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Timmis, I. (2014). Writing Materials for Publication: Questions Raised and Lessons Learned. In: Harwood, N. (eds) English Language Teaching Textbooks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-27630-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27628-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)