Skip to main content

Abstract

On 17 March 2011 the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) approved Resolution 1973. The Resolution empowered national governments acting alone or through regional organizations to ‘take all necessary measures’ to protect civilians and enforce a no-fly zone over Libya. Within 48 hours, armed forces from the United States, France, Britain, Canada and a handful of others launched aerial bombing raids against military and intelligence operations in Libya. These attacks would continue on a daily basis for the next eight months until the regime of Muammar Gaddafi collapsed and the leader himself was killed by insurgents. Ostensibly the Resolution and the no-fly zone were intended to protect civilian populations in the city of Benghazi that had been threatened by the Libyan president in response to rebel uprisings that had been taking place in the area since mid-February. The resolution marked a further escalation in the UNSC’s response to the deteriorating situation in Libya as it followed UNSC Resolution 1970 that had condemned the use of violence against civilian populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2011) ‘The Responsibility to Protect and the Problem of Regime Change’, in The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges and Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention. Available online at: www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/RTOP.pdf [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. and P. D. Williams (2011) ‘The New Politics of Protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect’, International Affairs, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 825–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges, S. (2011) ‘The BRICS and the UN: Coordination or Fragmentation?’, e-International Relations, 21 October. Available online at: www.e-ir.info/2011/10/21/the-brics-and-the-un-coordination-or-fragmentation [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. (2011) ‘Moving Beyond Sovereignty?’, Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 20, no. 68, pp. 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China (2005) ‘Position Paper of the People’s Republic of China on the United Nations Reforms’. Available online at: www.china-un.org/eng/xw/tl99101.htm [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Claude, I. L. (1966) ‘Collective Legitimation as a Political Function of the United Nations’, International Organisation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 367–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. E. (2011) ‘From Ideology to Pragmatism: China’s Position on Humanitarian Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 217–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. and J. Gifkins (2011) ‘Libya and the State of Intervention’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 515–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2011) ‘Who Is In Charge Here?’, 25 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R. and A. Walker (2011) China, the United States, and Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, T. M. (1990) The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D. (2011) ‘Libya and the Responsibilities of Power’, Survival, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. L. (2011) ‘The Illogic of a Nofly Zone for Libya’, UN Dispatch, 9 March. Available online at: www.undispatch.com/the-illogic-of-a-no-fly-zone-for-libya [Accessed August 2012].

  • Goldberg, M. L. (2012) ‘How Libya’s Success Became Syria’s Failure’, UN Dispatch, 19 January. Available online at: www.undispatch.com/how-libyas-success-became-syrias-failure [Accessed August 2012].

  • Hulme, M. (2011) ‘Chinese Sovereignty and the Structuration of the International Community’, paper presented to the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Waterloo, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, K. M. (2010) ‘South America’s Emerging Power: Brazil as Peacekeeper’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 644–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisch, N. (2008) ‘Great Powers and the Council’, in Vaughan Lowe, Adam Roberts, Jennifer Welsh and Dominik Zaum (eds), The United Nations Security Council and War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, E. (2011) Interview with Edward Luck, Special Advisor to the UN Secretary-General. Available online at: www.un.org/apps/news/newsmakers.asp?NewsID=38 [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, D. (1998) Decision-making in the UN Security Council: The Case of Haiti 1990–1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulaschek, C. (2010) ‘The United Nations Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect: Policy, Process and Practice’, in H. Winkler, T. Reid-Larsen and C. Mikulaschek (eds), The United Nations Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect, 39th IPI Seminar, Vienna, Austria, Factiva Paper 1/2010, pp. 20–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasu, H. (2009) ‘Operationalizing the “Responsibility to Protect” and Conflict Prevention: Dilemmas of Civilian Protection in Armed Conflict’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 209–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. and D. Zaum (2008) Selective Security, War and the United Nations since1945, Adelphi Paper 395 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, J. (2011) ‘Libya and R2P: The Failure of Bombing Raids to Protect Vulnerable Civilians’ (Waterloo, ON: Project Ploughshares).

    Google Scholar 

  • STRATFOR (2011) ‘France, UK Have Differing Motives for Intervening in Libya’, Forbes, 29 March. Available online at: www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2011/03/09/france-u-k-have-differing-motives-for-intervening-in-libya [Accessed August 2012].

  • Suzuki, S. (2008) ‘Seeking “Legitimate” Great Power Status in the Post-Cold War International Society: China’s and Japan’s Participation in UNPKO’, International Relations, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitt, S. (2011) ‘The Responsibility to Protect and China’s Peacekeeping Policy’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharoor, S. (2011) ‘Security Council Reform, Past, Present and Future’, Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 4. Available online at: www.ethicsandinternationalaffairs.org/2011/security-council-reform-past-present-and-future-full-text/ [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, S. (2011) ‘Lessons from Libya: How Cameron and Sarkozy Got Lucky’, The Guardian, 13 October. Available online at: www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/13/lessons-from-libya-obama-cameron-sarkozy [Accessed August 2012].

  • United Nations Security Resolutions 1970 and 1973, 2011. Available online at: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/268/39/PDF/N1126839.pdf?OpenElement [Accessed August 2012].

  • Vesel, D. (2004) ‘The Lonely Pragmatist: Humanitarian Intervention in an Imperfect World’, Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voeten, E. (2005) ‘The Political Origins of the UN Security Council’s Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force’, International Organisation, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 527–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voice of America (2011) ‘EU, NATO, UN Discuss Intervention in Libya’. Available online at: www.voanews.com/content/eu-nato-un-discuss-intervention-in-libya-116931063/170508.html [Accessed August 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. and D. Jackman (2011) ‘BRICS Form Unstable Foundation for Multilateral Action’, Foreign Policy Journal, 2 April. Available online at: www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/04/02/brics-form-unstable-foundation-for-multilateral-action [Accessed August 2012].

  • Welsh, J. (2010) ‘Implementing the “Responsibility to Protect”: Where Expectations Meet Reality’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 415–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Tom Keating

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keating, T. (2013). The UN Security Council on Libya: Legitimation or Dissimulation?. In: Hehir, A., Murray, R. (eds) Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273956_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics