Skip to main content

Climate Change and Society

  • Chapter
Why the Social Sciences Matter

Abstract

Contemporary societies are faced by a new spectre haunting the ‘globe’ — the changing of the world’s climate. This was not believed possible by scientists until fairly recently although the theoretical idea of a ‘greenhouse effect’ has been well established for a century or so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abbott, C. (2008). An Uncertain Future, Oxford: Oxford Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society, London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan Vision, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring, New York: Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2010). Who will build the ark? New Left Review, 61, 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F., Kemp, R., Dudley, G., and Lyons, G. (eds) (2012). Automobility in Transition? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. (2011). Storms of My Grandchildren, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity Without Growth, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, G. (1982). Schumacher on Energy, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, E. (2007). Winds of Change. Climate, Weather and the Destruction of Civilizations, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2001). The Skeptical Environmentalist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2008). A new dawn, Wall Street Journal, 8 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (2006). The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth Is Fighting Back — and How We Can Still Save Humanity, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. and Dunlap, R. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate change science and policy. Theory, Culture and Society, 27, 100–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montford, A. (2010). The Hockey Stick Illusion. Climategate and the Corruption of Science, London: Stacey International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. (2010). Merchants of Doubt, New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, C. (2011). Tropic of Chaos, New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (2007). With Speed and Violence. Why Scientists Fear Tipping Points in Climate Change, Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackley, S. (1997). The intergovernmental panel on climate change: consensual knowledge and global politics. Global Environmental Change, 7, 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., Panzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practices, London, SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2011). Climate Change and Society, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2013). Societies Beyond Oil, London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. (2011). When a Billion Chinese Jump, London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. (2009). Uncertainty and the IPCC. an editorial comment. Climatic Change, 92, 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (2010). Strange weather, again: climate science as political art. Theory, Culture and Society, 27, 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, K. (2009). Excess, catastrophe and climate change. Environment and Planning D. Society and Space, 27, 1010–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 John Urry

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urry, J. (2015). Climate Change and Society. In: Michie, J., Cooper, C.L. (eds) Why the Social Sciences Matter. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269928_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics