Skip to main content

Careers of Early- and Mid-career Academics

  • Chapter
Generation and Gender in Academia

Abstract

Even if higher education institutions (HEIs) have been subject to important changes in the last few decades, it is undeniable that today, as in the emergence of the modern higher education (HE) systems enhanced by the Humboldtian revolution, producing and disseminating knowledge is one of their main missions (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff 2000; Olssen & Peters 2005; Santiago et al. 2008). However, what is considered scientific knowledge is still the subject of epistemological and ontological discussion. There has been a discernible shift from the positivist perspective that maintains it is possible to obtain objective and true knowledge by using scientific methods to more recent discussion about the possible existence of a reality that is external to the individual (Alvesson & Sköldberg 2003; Foucault 2002). These newer approaches question the important relationship between the production of knowledge and notions of power and control, and feminist writers have strongly contributed to this debate (Hekman 1992; Alvesson & Sköldberg 2003; O’Connor 2012). Studies of women in science reveal how the role of women in science and HE has been neglected, mainly because science and HE reproduce the dominant stereotypes in society (Rose 1994; Oakley 1997; Schiebinger 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acar, F. (1983). ‘Turkish women in academia: Roles and careers’, METU Studies in Development10, 4, 409–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acar, F. (1990). ‘Role priorities and career patterns: A cross-cultural study of Turkish and Jordanian university teachers’, in S. Hie and V. Learyu (eds.), Storming the Tower: Women in Academic World (London: Kogan Page).

    Google Scholar 

  • Acar, F. (1991). ‘Women in academic science careers in Turkey’, in V. Stolte-Heiskanen, F. Acar, N. Ananiveva, D. Guadart and R. Fürst-Dilic (eds.), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality (Oxford: Berg Publishers), 147–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, L. (2010). ‘Internationalisation and equality: The contribution of short stay mobility to progression in science careers’, Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques 40, 1, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adesina, J. (2012). ‘The curious state of public sociology’, paper presented at the New Social Forms Seminar Series of the Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 11 October, Stellenbosch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K. (2003). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E., Mouton, J., Payze, C., Vorster, J., Boshoff, N. and Prozesky, H. (2001). The Practice of Social Research (Cape Town: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, S., Hasim, S. and Meintjies, S. (1998). ‘Country gender profile: South Africa’. Report no. 45 Prepared for the Swedish International Development Office (Sida) Pretoria, Republic of South Africa (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B. and White, K. (eds.) (2011). Gender, Power and Management: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Higher Education (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T., Boshoff, N., Davids, S., Galant, J., Hunter-Hüsselmann, M., Mouton, J., Prozesky, H. and Ritchie, F. (2004). Women in Science, Engineering and Technology in South Africa: Report to the Department of Science and Technology (Stellenbosch University: Centre for Research on Science and Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo Academicus (Stanford: Stanford Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Esboço para uma auto-análise [Outline for a self-analysis] (Lisbon: Edições Setenta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1997). Gender Equity in Australian University Staffing (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. (2012). ‘Shaping the “new” academic profession: Tensions and contradictions in the professionalization of academics’, in G. Neave and A. Amaral (eds.), Higher Education in Portugal 1974–2009. A Nation, A Generation (Dordrecht: Springer), 329–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and Machado, M. (2010). ‘Gender and shifts in higher education managerial regimes: Examples from Portugal’, Australian Universities’ Review 52, 2, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and Santiago, R. (2010). ‘Still academics after all’, Higher Education Policy 23, 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Science Development (CSD) (1999). ‘Women-in-research’, Report on the CSD Audit of Women Researchers and Academics in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Pretoria: Centre for Science Development, Human Sciences Research Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerdeira, L. (2009). ‘Cost-sharing policy in the European higher education: A comparative perspective’, Problems of Education in the 21st Century 15, 15, 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D., Knights, D. and Collinson, M. (1990). Managing to Discriminate (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Higher Education (YÖK) (2012). http://www.yok.gov.tr, accessed 20 October 2012.

  • Deem, R. (1998). “New managerialism” and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom’, International Studies in Sociology of Education 8, 1, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rey, C. (1999). ‘Career narratives of women professors in South Africa’, PhD thesis, University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Arts, Culture, Science and Technology (DACST) (1998). National Research and Technology Audit: Human Resources in Science Engineering and Technology (Pretoria: Foundation for Research Development & DACST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryler, H., Inkinen, M. and Lagerkvist, A. C. (2011). Forskarkarriär för både kvin-nor och män? Statistisk uppföljning och kunskapsöversikt [Research careers for both men and women?—Statistical follow-up and review] (Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, M., Flynn, A. and Inman, P. (1991). ‘Differential progress of women faculty: Status 1980–1990’, in J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Edison: Agathon), 173–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, M. (1982). Dualism in Values towards Education of Turkish Women, Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey (Bloomington: Indiana University Turkish Studies), 121–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). ‘The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and Mode 2 to a triple helix of university industry government relations’, Research Policy 29, 2, 109–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveline, J. (2004). Ivory Basement Leadership (Crawley: University of Western Australia Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002). The Archaeology of Knowledge (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galant, J., Mouton, J., Boshoff, N., De Beer, J., Esau, S., Prozesky, H. and Lorenzen, L. (2005). A Monitoring and Evaluation Framework to Benchmark the Performance of Women in the NSI: Report to the SET4W Re ference Group (Stellenbosch University: Centre for Research on Science and Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, U. (2009). ‘Doing leadership in higher education: The gendering process of leader identity development’, Tertiary Education and Management 15, 2, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (2001). ‘Academia, management and men: Making the connections, exploring the implications’, in A. Brooks and A. Mackinnon (eds.), Gender and the Restructured University (Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press), 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. (1992). ‘The embodiment of the subject: Feminism and the communitarian critique of liberalism’, Journal of Politics 54, 4, 1096–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education South Africa (HESA) (2011). A Generation of Growth: Proposal for a National Programme to Develop the Next Generation of Academics for South African Higher Education, http://www.hesa.org.za/sites/hesa.org.za/files/Buildingper cent20theper cent20Nextper cent20Generationper cent20ofpercent20Academics_Marchper cent202011.pdf, date accessed 26 October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovden, J., Kvande, E. and Rasmussen, B. (2011). ‘Gender and the production of elites in the Nordic countries: New directions in research’, Gender in Management 26, 6, 408–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husu, L. (2005). Dold könsdiskriminering på akademiska arenor – osynligt, synligt, subtilt [Hidden sex discrimination in academic arenas – invisible, visible, subtly] (Stockholm: Högskoleverket).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbins, D. (2012). ‘Universities struggle to shed apartheid topography’, University World News, http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20121023192747849, accessed 29 October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koker, E. (1988). ‘Türkiye’de Kadin, Eğitim ve Siyaset: Yüksek Öğrenim Kurum-larinda Kadinin Durumu Üzerine Bir Ĭnceleme’ [Women, Education and Politics in Turkey: The Situation of Women in Higher Education], PhD thesis, Ankara University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurnaz, Ş. (1996). II.Meşutiyet Döneminde Türk Kadini [Turkish Women during II. Constitutional Period] (Istanbul: MilliEğitim Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, G., Jansson, U., Jonsson, A. and Mattsson, T. (2010). Nördar, nomader och duktiga flickor — kön och jämställdhet i excellenta miljöer [Geeks, nomads and talented girls — sex and gender in excellent environments] (Stockholm: DJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes, A. and Santiago, R. (2012). ‘Governance, public management and administration of higher education in Portugal’, in G. Neave and A. Amaral (eds.), Higher Education in Portugal 1974–2009: A Nation, A Generation (Dordrecht: Springer), 227–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maürtin-Cairncross, A. (2003). ‘Creating “space” for publication: Challenges faced by women academic staff at historically black South African universities’, PhD thesis, University of the Western Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moultrie, A. and De la Rey, C. (2003). ‘South African women leaders in higher education: Professional development needs in a changing context’, McGill Journal of Education 38, 3, 407–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. (2010). ‘The state of social science in sub-Saharan Africa’, in World Social Science Report 2010: Knowledge Divides (Paris: UNESCO Publishing & International Social Science Council), 63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, J. and Gevers, W. (2009). ‘Introduction’, in R. Diab and W. Gevers (eds.), The State of Science in South Africa (Pretoria: Academy of Science of South Africa), 39–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1997). ‘A brief history of gender’, in A. Oakley and J. Mitchell (eds.), Who’s Afraid of Feminism? Seeing through the Backlash (London: Hamish Hamilton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2001), ‘Foreword’, in A. Brooks and A. Mackinnon (eds.), Gender and the Restructured University (Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press), xi–xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (2012). ‘Irish universities: male-dominated? Limits and possibilities for change?’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31, 1, 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. and Peters, M. (2005). ‘Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism’, Journal of Education Policy 20, 3, 313–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbilgin, M. and Healy, G. (2004). ‘The gendered nature of career development of professors: The case of Turkey’, Journal of Vocational Behaviour 64, 358–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozguc, N. (1998). ‘Türkiye Üniversitelerinde Kadin Coğrafyacilar [Women Geographers in Turkish Universities]’, in N. Arat (ed.), Aydinlanmamn Kadinlart [Women of Enlightenment] (Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Book Club), 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkanli, Ö. (2006). ‘The situation of academic women in Turkish universities’, in T. Jefferson, L. Lord, N. Nelson and A. Preston (eds.), Changes. Challenges. Choices. Conference Proceedings from the Inaugural International Women & Leadership Conference (Fremantle: Women in Social and Economic Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkanli, Ö. (2007). ‘The situation of academic women in Turkey’, TED Education and Science Journal 32, 144, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkanli, Ö., de Lourdes Machado, M. , White, K. , O’Connor, P., Riordan, S., and Neale, J. (2009). ‘Gender and management in HEIs: changing organizational and management structures’, Tertiary Education and Management 15, 13, 241–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkanli, Ö. and Korkmaz, A. (2000). Kadin Akademisyenler [Academic Women] (Ankara: Ankara University Publication 586).

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkanli, Ö. and White, K. (2008). ‘Leadership and strategic choices: Female professors in Australia and Turkey’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 30, 1, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perumal, J. (2003). ‘Identifying and responding to barriers impacting women educators: Reflections by feminist educators on institutional constraints’, South African Journal of Higher Education 17, 1, 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. (2010). ‘Women’s career strategies in engineering: Confronting masculine workplace culture’, in A.-S. Godfroy-Genin (ed.), Women in Engineering and Technology Research (Berlin: Lit Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. (2011). ‘Gendered work-life balance strategies in the Swedish ICT business’, in A. Béraud and Y. Pourrat (eds.), The Scientific and Technological Careers of Women and Men. Private Temporalities, Professional Temporalities; Public and Corporate Policies (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers), 225–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. (2012). ‘Absent non-fathers: Gendered representations of voluntary childlessness in Swedish newspapers’, Feminist Media Studies 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pordata (2012). ‘Portuguese statistics on education’, http://www.pordata.pt/Tema/Portugal/Educacao-17, accessed 20 October 2012.

  • Prinsloo, J. (2000). ‘Teaching talk back: Reflections on a workshop for women writing for publication’, Agenda, 46, 55–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prozesky, H. E. (1998). ‘The principles and characteristics of participatory action research: A critical evaluation’, M. Phil. thesis, Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozesky, H. E. (1999). Literature Review: Youth and Gender Issues in South Africa, Teenage Girls in South Africa and Teenage Girls on Commercial Farms in South Africa (Stellenbosch: Women on Farms Project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozesky, H. E. (2006). ‘Gender differences in the publication productivity of South African scientists’, PhD thesis, Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozesky, H. E. and Mouton, J. (2001). ‘The participatory research paradigm’, in J. Coetzee, J. Graff, F. Hendricks and G. Wood (eds.), Development: Theory, Policy, and Practice (Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa), 537–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, K. and Letherby, G. (2006). ‘The experience of academic non-mothers in the gendered university’, Gender, Work and Organization 13, 1, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2004). ‘Cultural capitalists and academic habitus: Classed and gendered labour in UK higher education’, Women’s Studies International Forum 27, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. and Roos, P. (1990). Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. (1994). Love, Power, and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Science (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagebiel, F. (2010). ‘Gendered organisational cultures and networks in engineering research’, in A.-S. Godfroy-Genin (ed.), Women in Engineering and Technology Research (Berlin: LitVerlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagebiel, F., Hendrix, U. and Schrettenbrunner, C. (2011). ‘Women engineers and scientists at the top as change agents?’, Paper presented to Gender Renewals? Gender Work and Organisation International Workshop Series, VU University Amsterdam, 22–24 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, U., Wold, A., Jordansson, B., Ohlsson, B. and Smedberg, Å. (2010). Hans Excellens: om miljardsatsningarna på starka forskningsmiljöer [His Excellency: concerning billion SEK investment into strong research milieus] (Stockholm: DJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R. and Carvalho, T. (2008). ‘Academics in a new work environment: The impact of new public management on work conditions’, Higher Education Quarterly 62, 3, 204–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, R., Carvalho, T. and Relva, R. (2008). ‘Research and the universities’ image’, European Journal of Education 43, 4, 495–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has Feminism Changed Science? (Harvard: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa Santos, B. (2003). A crítica da razão indolente: contra o desperdício da experiência [The critique of lazy reason: against the waste of experience] (Porto: Afrontamento).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, P. (1991). ‘On the relations between seeing, interpreting and knowing’, in F. Steier (ed.), Research and Reflexivity (London: Sage), 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subotzky, G. (2001). ‘A statistical profile of staff equity’, in The Employment Equity Act: Implications and Challenges for Higher Education (Sunnyside: Centre for Higher Education Transformation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, S. (2001). ‘“Man, gun and horse”: Hard right Afrikaner masculine identity in post-apartheid South Africa’, in R. Morrell (ed.), Changing Men in Southern Africa (Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, P. (2012). ‘The changing public-private mix in higher education: Analysing Portugal’s apparent exceptionalism’, in G. Neave and A. Amaral (eds.), Higher Education in Portugal 1974–200: A Nation, A Generation (Dordrecht: Springer), 307–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil, L. (1993). ‘Gender differences in the academic career in New Zealand universities’, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 28, 2, 143–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. (2013). ‘Uneasy relations: Women, gender equality and tradition in post-apartheid South Africa’, Thesis Eleven.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1991). ‘Doing gender’, in J. Lorber, and S. Farrell (eds.), The Social Construction of Gender (Newbury Park: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Teresa Carvalho, Özlem Özkanli, Heidi Prozesky and Helen Peterson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carvalho, T., Özkanli, Ö., Prozesky, H., Peterson, H. (2013). Careers of Early- and Mid-career Academics. In: Bagilhole, B., White, K. (eds) Generation and Gender in Academia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269171_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics