Skip to main content

Micro-credit Access and Household Welfare in Rural Cameroon

  • Chapter
Promoting Microfinance
  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

Microfinance is expected to help poor households generate income through micro-activities, smooth consumption, give them dignity and consequently enhance their wellbeing. Many studies have shown that by providing low-income households with access to financial services, their productivity, management skills and quality of life improve (Khandker, 1998; Zeiler, 2000; ADB, 2000; Parker and Nagarajan, 2001; Morduch and Haley, 2002). Unfortunately, because of the lack of collateral and high transaction costs, the poor and vulnerable cannot access formal bank credits (Pitt and Khandker, 1998; Khandker, 2003). Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have the potential to provide this missing link. The attention on microfinance and its role in reducing poverty was further amplified when Mohammad Yunus received the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. According to the Nobel Committee, microfinance can help people to break out of poverty, which in turn is seen as an important prerequisite to establishing long-lasting peace (Norwegian Nobel Committee, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB (2000) Finance for the Poor: Microfinance Development Strategy (Manila: Asian Development Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. (1970) ‘The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardenser, S. (1964) ‘The Comparative Study of Rotating Credit Associations’, Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 201–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., A. Demirguc-Kunt and R. Levine (2004) Finance, Inequality and Poverty: Cross-country Evidence, World Bank Economic Working Paper, No. 3338 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bester, H. (1987) ‘Screening vs. Rationing in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 850–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bester, H. (1987) ‘The Role of Collateral in Credit Markets with Imperfect Information’, European Economic Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 887–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, F. J. A. and K. Harteveld (1976) ‘The Njangi: A Traditional Form of Savings and Credit in West Cameroon’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 16, nos 1 and 2, pp. 103–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman B. E. (2002) Microfinance in Northeast Thailand: Who Benefits and How Much?, Economics and Research Department Working Paper 9 (Manila: Asian Development Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull R., A, Demirguc-Kunt and J. Morduch (2008) Microfinance Meets the Market, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4630 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El-Solh C. F. (1999) Feasibility and Operationalization of Microcredit Finance Facilities Targeting Poor Women in Urban and Rural Areas in Selected Arab Countries: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Considerations, Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (New York: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, M. (1999) ‘Group Lending, Local Information and Peer Selection’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, M. (2000) ‘Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Effect’, The Economic Journal, vol. 110, no. 465, pp. 601–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, V. C. (2003) ‘Deepening Rural Financial Markets: Macroeconomic, Policy and Political Dimensions’, paper for Paving the Way Forward: An International Conference on Best Practices in Rural Finance, Washington, DC, June 2003, pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Q. M. (2005) Access to Finance and Poverty Reduction an Application to Rural Vietnam, PhD Thesis, Department of Accounting and Finance, Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979) ‘Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error’, Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. and P. Mosley (1996) Finance against Poverty, Volume 1 (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2003) Cameroon: PRSP, 2003 Implementation Report, IMF Country Report, No. 03/249 (Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2007) ‘Microfinance Misses its Mark’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer, available online at: http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/microfinance_misses_its_mark (accessed 22 February 2013).

  • Khandker, S. R. (1998) Fighting Poverty with Microcredit: Experience in Bangladesh (New York, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R. (2001) Does Micro-finance Really Benefit the Poor? Evidence from Bangladesh. Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty: Reforming Policies and Institutions for Poverty Reduction (Manila: Asian Development Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R. (2005) ‘Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh’, World Bank Economic Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 263–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandker, S. R. and R. R. Faruque (2001) The Impact of Farm Credit in Pakistan, Rural Development, Development Research Group (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield, E., J. Morduch and S. Hashemi (2003) Is Microfinance an Effective Strategy to Reach the Millennium Development Goals?, CGAP Occasional Paper 24 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. and G. Nagarajan (1992) ‘An Assessment of the Role of Informal Finance in the Development Process’, in G. H. Peters and B. F. Stanton (eds), Sustainable Agricultural Development: The Role of International Cooperation (Brookfield: Dartmouth Press), pp. 644–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. and G. Nagarajan (2000) ‘Rural Financial Markets in Asia: Policies, Paradigms, and Performance’, in A Study of Rural Asia 3 by the Asian Development Bank (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1995) ‘Income Smoothing and Consumption Smoothing’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (2000) ‘The Microfinance Schism’, World Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 617–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch. J. and B. Haley (2002) Analysis of the Effects of Micro finance on Poverty Reduction, NYU Wagner Working Paper No. 1014 (Gatineau: Canadian International Development Agency).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwabu, G. (2009) ‘The Production of Child Health in Kenya: A Structural Model of Birth Weight’, Journal of African Economies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 212–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Statistics (2001) Data Base of CHCS II (Yaoundé: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Programming and Regional Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Statistics (2008) Trends, Profiles and Determinants of Poverty in Cameroon in 2007: Fact Sheet (Yaoundé: Ministry of the Economy, Planning and Regional Development).

    Google Scholar 

  • Navajas, S., J. Conning, and V. C. Gonzalez (2003) ‘Lending Technologies, Competition, and Consolidation in the Market for Microfinance in Bolivia’, Journal of International Development, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 747–70. Available online at: http://www.interscience.wiley.com.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Nobel Committee (2006) ‘The Nobel Peace Prize 2006’, press release, Oslo, October. Available online at: http://nobelprize.org (home page, accessed 22 February 2011).

  • Panjaitan-Drioadisuryo, D. M. R and K. Cloud (1999) ‘Gender, Self-employment and Microcredit Programs: An Indonesian Case Study’, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 769–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker J. and G. Nagarajan (2001) Can Microfinance Meet the Poor’s Needs in Times of Natural Disaster? Microenterprise Best Practices (Bethesda: Development Alternatives, Inc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M. and S. R. Khandker (1998) ‘The Impact of Group-based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of Participants Matter?’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 958–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, J. and Q. Benjamin (2000) Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation: Case Studies from Asia and the Pacific (London and New York: Pinter, Continuum Press), pp. 131–34 and 253–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne, E. (1998) ‘The Yin and Yang of Microfinance: Reaching the Poor and Sustainability’, The Microbanking Bulletin, no. 2, July, pp. 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. S. (2001) The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009) What Do We Really Know about Microfinance?, available online at: http://blogs.cgdev.org (home page, accessed 22 February 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. (1997) ‘Instrument Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models: A Simple Measure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 348–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss (1981) ‘Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information’, American Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H. and M. Yogo (2004) Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression, Mimeo, Department of Economics, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (Cambridge: MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994) Cameroon, Diversity, Growth, and Poverty Reduction (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. A. N. (2000) Microfinance Systems: Designing Quality Financial Services for the Poor (London and New York: Zed Books/The Dhaka University Press Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaron, J., B. McDonald and S. Charitonenko (1998) ‘Promoting Efficient Rural Financial Intermediation’, The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 147–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. (2000) Product Innovation for the Poor: The Role of Microfinance, Policy Brief No. 3: Rural Financial Policies for Food Security of the Poor (Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, M. (2003) Models of Rural Financial Institutions, paper for Paving the Way Forward: An International Conference on Best Practices in Rural Finance, Washington, DC, 2–4 June.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Francis Menjo Baye

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baye, F.M. (2013). Micro-credit Access and Household Welfare in Rural Cameroon. In: Manos, R., Gueyié, JP., Yaron, J. (eds) Promoting Microfinance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034915_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics