Abstract
At the outset of the twentieth century, reports of atrocities in the administration of the Congo Free State by King Leopold II of Belgium excited the moral outrage of the British public. As the foreign secretary, Sir Edward Grey, later remarked, “no external question for at least thirty years has moved the country so strongly and so vehemently”.1 At the forefront of the movement to publicize the horrors was the honorary secretary of the Congo Reform Association (CRA), E. D. Morel. He believed that the mobilization of Britain would stir the conscience of the rest of the world; if “the British people could be really roused, the world might be roused”; and Leopold’s brutal regime would be eradicated.2 With his assistance, branches of the CRA sprouted up across Europe [from 1900 onwards]. Yet, outside Britain, only in the United States did the cause of Congo reform become a truly mass movement. Together the two associations cultivated public opinion and lobbied their governments to alleviate the suffering in the Congo. Popular pressure ultimately led to diplomatic action [in 1908]. Following a scandal in the United States over Leopold’s attempts to combat his deteriorating public image, the British and American governments joined together to press for an end to the king’s regime. The subsequent downfall of Leopold’s administration and the annexation of the Congo Free State by Belgium was largely a consequence of this Anglo-American intervention, the first of its kind in the twentieth century.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Quoted in E. D. Morel, William Roger Louis and Jean Stengers, E.D. Morel’s History of the Congo Reform Movement (Oxford, 1968), p. xiv.
Quoted in Adam Hochschild, King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror and Heroism in Colonial Africa (Boston, MA, 1998), p. 165.
J. L. Garvin and Julian Amery, The Life of Joseph Chamberlain, 4 vols. (London, 1932–51), III, p. 167.
Although the primary goal of the intervening powers was to protect their own nationals, it did result in a large number of mostly Christian Chinese being protected from slaughter. See Martha Finnemore, Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force (Ithaca, NY, 2004), p. 58;
Joseph Choate to John Hay, 3 Sept. 1902, Department of State, Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States (hereafter FRUS), 1902, pp. 549–50.
For background, see Jan Stengers, “Leopold II and the association Internationale du Congo”, in Stig Forster, Wolfgang J. Mommsen and John Robinson, eds., Bismarck, Europe and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition (Oxford, 1988) pp. 229–44; Martti Koskennielmi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge, 2002), pp. 155–9.
Kevin Grant, A Civilized Savagery: Britain and the New Slaveries in Africa, 1884– 1926 (New York, 2005), p. 43.
Samuel H. Nelson, Colonialism in the Congo Basin, 1880–1940 (Athens, OH, 1994) p. 82.
E. D. More, Red Rubber: The Story of the Rubber Slave Trade Flourishing on the Congo on the Year of Grace 1906 (London, 1907), p. xxvii.
Frederick Cooper, “Conditions analogous to slavery: imperialism and free labor ideology in Africa”, in Frederick Cooper, Thomas C. Holt, and Rebecca J. Scott, eds, Beyond Slavery (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2000), pp. 111–12.
S. J. S. Cookey, Britain and the Congo Question, 1885–1913 (London, 1968), pp. 91–112.
E. D. Morel, King Leopold’s Rule in Africa (London, 1904), p. xvii.
E. D. Morel, The Congo Slave State: A Protest Against the New African Slavery; and an Appeal to the Public of Great Britain, of the United States, and of the Continent of Europe (Liverpool, 1903).
Peter Duignan and L. H. Gann, The United States and Africa: A History (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 126–32, 194–5; Hochschild, Leopold’s Ghost, pp. 77–80.
George Washington Williams, History of the Negro Race in America from 1619 to 1880 (New York, 1883).
Elliott P. Skinner, African Americans and U.S. Policy Toward Africa, 1850–1924 (Washington, DC, 1992), pp. 215–240.
Robert Benedetto, ed., Presbyterian Reformers in Central Africa (Leiden, 1996), p. 221 f.n. 12.
John T. Ellis, The Life of Cardinal Gibbons: Archbishop of Baltimore, 1834–1921 (Westminster, MD, 1987).
John T. Morgan, “Shall Negro Majorities Rule?” in Forum 6 (Feb. 1889), p. 595.
See Andrew Zimmerman, Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire and the Globalization of the New South (Princeton, NJ, 2010), pp. 219–20.
Hunt Hawkins, “Mark Twain’s involvement with the Congo reform movement: ‘a fury of generous indignation,’” New England Quarterly, 51, 2 (1978), pp. 147–75.
Mark Twain, King Leopold’s Soliloquy: A Defense of His Congo Rule (Boston, MA, 1905).
John Hay to J. W. Foster, 23 Jun. 1900, in William Roscoe Thayer, The Life and Letters of John Hay, 2 vols. (London, 1915), II, pp. 234–5.
Theodore Roosevelt to Eugene A. Philbin, 28 Sept. 1904, in Elting E. Morison, ed., The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt (Cambridge, MA, 1951), IV, p. 958.
William Roger Louis, Ends of British Imperialism: The Scramble for Empire, Suez and Decolonization, Collected Essays (London, 2006), p. 163.
Phillip C. Jessup, “The defense of oppressed people”, The American Journal of International Law, 31, 1 (1938), pp. 116–19.
Quoted in Jerome L. Sternstein, “King Leopold II, Senator Nelson W. Aldrich and the strange beginnings of American economic penetration of the Congo”, African Historical Studies, 2, 2 (1969), pp. 189–204.
Louis, ‘E.D. Morel and the Triumph of the Congo Reform Association,’ p. 180; Frederick Seymour Cocks, E.D. Morel, the Man and His Work (London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1920), p. 161.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Charles Laderman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laderman, C. (2013). The Invasion of the United States by an Englishman: E. D. Morel and the Anglo-American Intervention in the Congo. In: Mulligan, W., Bric, M. (eds) A Global History of Anti-slavery Politics in the Nineteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032607_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032607_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44116-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03260-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)