Skip to main content

Convergence, Co-evolution and Complexity in European Communications Policy

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy

Abstract

Convergence is not only a widely used buzzword in the communications sector but also a helpful analytical concept. It represents a central developmental trend, comparable to liberalization and globalization, that shapes the course and transformation of European communications policy. At the same time, the analysis of European communications policy informs the understanding of convergence and its implications, in particular regarding an emerging common governance pattern for convergent markets. Moreover, embedded in a combined framework of co-evolution and complexity perspectives, the convergence concept also makes it possible to draw some general basic guidelines regarding future policies in convergent and increasingly complex communication environments. Such an analytical framework compensates for deficits in the convergence concept, which is strong in the analysis of the ‘old’ converging parts but weak in the explanation of the emerging ‘new’ forms triggered by the convergence process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AVMS (2010). Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive). Codified version. L 95/1. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:095:0001:0024:EN:PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E. D. (2006). The Origin of Wealth. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. (2010). General Purpose Technologies. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (pp. 761–791). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, B. A. (2007). The Telecommunications Economy and Regulation as Coevolving Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications for Federalism. Federal Communications Law Journal, 59(2), 369–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, B. A., & Bauer, J. M. (2004). Adaptive Regulation: Contours of a Policy Model for the Internet. Paper Presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society. Retrieved from http://www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13 7.1240.

  • COM — European Commission (1984). Television without Frontiers. Green Paper on the Establishment of the Common Market for Broadcasting, Especially by Satellite and Cable. COM (84) 300. Retrieved from http://www.ec.europa.eu/green-papers/pdf/tv_without_frontiersgreen-paper_able_com84_300.pdf.

  • COM — European Commission (1987). Green Paper on the Development of the Common Market for Telecommunications Services and Equipment. COM (87) 290. Retrieved from http://www.aei.pitt.edu/1159/1/telecom_services_gp_COM_87_290.pdf.

  • COM — European Commission (1997). Green Paper on the Convergence of the Telecom-munications, Media and Information Technology Sectors, and the Implications for Regulation. COM (97) 623. Retrieved from http://www.ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/library/legal/com/greenp_97_623_en.pdf.

  • COM — European Commission (2002). Commission Decision of 29 July 2002 establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services. 2002/627/EC. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:200:0038:0038:EN:PDF.

  • COM — European Commission (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Council and the Committee of the Regions: ‘i2010 — A European Information Society for growth and employment’. COM(2005) 229. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0229:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • COM — European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Council and the Committee of the Regions: ‘A Digital Agenda for Europe’. COM(2010) 245. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2010). Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes. In B.H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (pp. 51–127). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EC — European Council (2009). Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services, 2002/19/EC on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Net-works and Associated Facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the Authorisation of Electronic Communications Networks and Services. 2009/140/EC. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:337:0037:0069:EN:PDF

  • EC (2011). Digital Agenda for Europe: Annual Progress Report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/documents/dae_annual_report_2011.pdf.

  • Fagerjord, A., & Storsul, T. (2007). Questioning Convergence. In T. Storsul & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence Towards Convergence. Digitalization and Media Change (pp.19–31). Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York & London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2004). Self- and Co-Regulation in the Mediamatics Sector. European Community (EC) Strategies and Contributions towards a Transformed Statehood. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 17(2), 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsteuber, H. J. (2008). Convergence of Media Systems: The International Encyclopedia of Communication. In W. Donsbach (Ed), Blackwell Reference Online, Available at http://www.communicationencyclopedia.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_yr2012_chunk_g9781405131999_ss39–1 (accessed 20 July 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (1997). Mediamatik. Die Konvergenz von Telekommunikation, Computer und Rundfunk. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (1998). European Mediamatics Policies: Coping with Convergence and Globalization. Telecommunications Policy, 22(6), 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2009a). ICT Innovations: Radical & Disruptive? New Media & Society, 11(4), 599–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2009b). Convergence Revisited. Convergence, 15(4), 411–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2013a). Media Convergence. In C. Handke & R. Towse (Eds.), Handbook of the Digital Creative Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M. (2013b). Towards an Innovation-Co-evolution-Complexity Perspective on Communications Policy. In S. Pfaff & M. Löblich (Eds.), Communication and Media Policy in the Era of the Internet. Baden-Baden: Nomos (pp. 15–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M., & Saurwein, F. (2007). Vertrauen in die Industrie — Vertrauen in die Nutzer: Selbstregulierung und Selbsthilfe bei digitalen Medieninhalten in der EU, Bericht für die Expertenkonferenz zur europäischen Medienpolitik: Mehr Vertrauen in Inhalte — das Potential von Ko- und Selbstregulierung in den digitalen Medien, Mai 2007, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M., Just, N., Saurwein, F. & Slominski, P. (2006). Institutional Variety in Communications Regulation Classification Scheme and Empirical Evidence from Austria. Telecommunications Policy, 30(3–4), 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, L. (2006). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, P. (2002). The Communications Toolkit. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlade, J., & Garnsey, E. (Eds.) (2006). Complexity and Co-evolution. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, S., & Minc, A. (1978). L’informatisation de la société. Paris: La Documentation Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005). Telecommunication Regulatory Institutional Structures and Responsibilities: Report to the Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osimo, D. (2012). ‘Light and Fast’ Funding for Innovation: Making EU Innovation Policies Fit for the Web. Conference Paper presented at the 27th European Communications Policy Research Conference. Ghent, Belgium, 25–27 March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool, I. de S. (1983). Technologies Offreedom. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, D. G. (2009). In Search of Jefferson’s Moose. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V. (2012). Governance and Complexity. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 129–142). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V., & Bauer, J. (2007). Governance Prospects of Complexity Theory in Revis-iting System Theory. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., & Held, T. (2004). Regulated Self-Regulation as a Form of Modern Government. Luton: Univ. of Luton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuppert, G. F. (Ed.) (2006). Governance-Forschung. Vergewisserung über Stand und Entwicklungslinien. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storsul, T., & Fagerjord, A. (2008). Digitization and Media Convergence: The International Encyclopedia of Communication. In W. Donsbach (Ed.). Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved from http://www.communicationencyclopedia.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_yr2012_chunk_g97814051319959_ss39–1 (accessed 20 July 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storsul, T., & Stuedahl, D. (Eds.) (2007). Ambivalence Towards Convergence. Digitalization and Media Change. Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streel, Alexandre de (2008). Current and Future European Regulation of Electronic Communications: A Critical Assessment. Telecommunications Policy, 32(11), 722–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TFEU (2008). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. C 115/47. Retrieved from http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:00447:0199:en:PDF.

  • Voss, J.-P., & Bauknecht, D. (2007). Der Einfluss von Technik auf Governance-Innovationen. In U. Dolata & R. Werle (Eds.), Gesellschaft und die Macht der Technik (pp. 109–131). Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Cuilenberg, J., & Slaa, P. (1993). From Media Policy towards a National Communica-tions Policy. European Journal of Communication, 8(2), 149–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Cuilenburg, J., & McQuail, D. (2003). Media Policy Paradigm Shifts: Towards a New Communications Policy Paradigm. European Journal of Communication, 18(2), 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitt, R., & Schultze, S. (2009). The New ‘Emergence Economics’ of Innovation and Growth, And What It Means for Communications Policy. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 7(2), 217–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, M. O. (2006). Issues in Media Convergence. In A. B. Albarran, S. Chan-Olmsted & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of Media Management and Economics (pp.445–462). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, I. (2004). Canada, South Korea, Netherlands and Sweden: Regulatory Implications of the Convergence of Telecommunications, Broadcasting and Internet Services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Michael Latzer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latzer, M. (2014). Convergence, Co-evolution and Complexity in European Communications Policy. In: Donders, K., Pauwels, C., Loisen, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032195_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics