Skip to main content

Virginia Woolf and Metonymic Realism: Making It New?

  • Chapter
New Directions in the History of the Novel
  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

Ezra Pound’s injunction to ‘Make it New’ seems still to encapsulate the consensual critical view of literary modernism’s aesthetic imperative.1 Although recent research has comprehensively demonstrated the engagement of modernist writers with the social issues of their day, there has been little interrogation of the prevailing assumption that modernism is characterised by its rejection of past forms, especially realism. Woolf criticism, certainly, seems caught in this historiographical inertia, despite the recent focus upon the cultural contexts of her writing.2 Linden Peach, in his illuminating study of Woolf’s historical perspective (2000), reiterates the prevailing orthodoxy: ‘The Years, despite its apparent concessions to social realism, … can be seen in terms of her quarrel with realism in her essay “Modern Fiction” (1919).’ For Peach, Woolf’s work is anti-realist in that it is ‘located at the very juncture between deconstruction and New Historicism’.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and reference

  1. E. Pound (1934) Make It New (London: Faber & Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Recent cultural studies of Woolf include M. Cuddy-Keane (2003) Virginia Woolf, the Intellectual, and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Snaith (2000) Public and Private Negotiations (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan);

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Whitworth (2005) Virginia Woolf (Oxford: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bradshaw (2000) ‘Introduction’, in V. Woolf, Mrs Dalloway, ed. D. Bradshaw (Oxford: Oxford University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  6. among the discussions to consider Woolf and realism, see, S. Dick (2000) ‘Literary Realism in Mrs Dalloway, To the Lighthouse and The Waves’, in S. Roe and S. Sellers (eds), Cambridge Companion to Virginia Woolf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 50–71;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. S. P. Rosenbaum (1971) ‘The philosophical realism of Virginia Woolf’, in S. P. Rosenbaum (ed.), English Literature and British Philosophy (Chicago: Chicago University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Zwerdling (1986) Virginia Woolf and the Real World (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Peach (2000) Virginia Woolf (Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 169 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I take this term from Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy of Critical Realism. See R. Bhaskar and M. Hartwig (2010) The Formation of Critical Realism: A Personal Perspective (London: Routledge), pp. 51–73,

    Google Scholar 

  11. and A. Collier (1994) Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Lukács (1950) Studies in European Realism, trans. E. Bone (London: Merlin Press), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Brecht (1977) ‘Popularity and Realism’, in R. Taylor (ed.), Aesthetics and Politics (London: Verso), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Woolf (1940; 2003) Roger Fry: A Biography (London: Vintage), p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Jameson (1977) ‘Reflections in Conclusion’, in R. Taylor (ed.), Aesthetics and Politics (London: Verso), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Woolf (1966) Collected Essays, ed. L. Woolf, 4 vols. (London: Chatto & Windus), vol. 1, p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Jakobson (1956) ‘Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbance’, in R. Jakobson and M. Halle, Fundamentals of Language (The Hague: Mouton), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also R. Jakobson (1960) ‘Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics’, in T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language (London: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Barthes (1990) S/Z, trans. R. Miller (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Derrida (1982) ‘White Mythologies: Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy’, in A. Bass (trans.) Margins of Philosophy (Brighton: Harvester Press), p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Woolf (2000) Mrs Dalloway, ed. D. Bradshaw (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 120. Subsequent references in the text are to this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Boucher (ed.) (1997) The British Idealists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. xxi–ii.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Stephen (1893) ‘Ethics and the Struggle for Existence’, Contemporary Review, LXIV, 155–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For an account of the influence of Russell on Woolf, see A. Banfield (2000) The Phantom Table: Woolf, Fry, Russell and the Epistemology of Modernism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Russell (2007) Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (Nottingham: Spokesman), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Russell (1959) The Problems of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Barthes (1960) ‘The Reality Effect’, in T. Todorov, French Literary Theory, trans. R. Carter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. Latour (2004) ‘Why has Critique Run out of Steam: From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, in B. Brown (ed.) Things (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See K. Czarnecki and C. Rohman (eds) (2011) Virginia Woolf and the Natural World (Clemson, SC: Clemson University Digital Press), for essays on flowers in Mrs Dalloway and elsewhere.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For further discussion of the metonymic trace of cars in Mrs Dalloway see P. Morris (2013) ‘Woolf and Realism’, in J. Goldman and B. Randall (eds), Woolf in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. B. S. Haldane (1924) Daedalus or Science and the Future (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner), pp. 10, 40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Uglow (2005) A Little History of British Gardening (London: Pimlico), p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  33. M. Campbell-Culver (2001) The Origin of Plants (London: Transworld), p. 356.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quoted in M. Thomson (1998) The Problems of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press), p. 47.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomson (1998), pp. 120–4; E. Shorter (1997) A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac (New York: Wiley), pp. 65–6, 143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Pam Morris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morris, P. (2014). Virginia Woolf and Metonymic Realism: Making It New?. In: Parrinder, P., Nash, A., Wilson, N. (eds) New Directions in the History of the Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026989_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics