Skip to main content

Governing Innovation Paths in Regenerative Medicine: The European and Global Struggle for Political Advantage

  • Chapter
The Global Dynamics of Regenerative Medicine

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

Abstract

Over the last decade, ‘innovation’ has acquired an iconic status in the pantheon of state policies as governments compete for access to the knowledge economies of the future through a search for the appropriate alchemy of innovation governance. Propelled by the imperatives of globalisation, the expectations of their populations and the geopolitics of inter-state competition for future economic territories, ambitious governments have uniformly come to regard innovation policy as the key to unlocking the potential offered by the advancement of science. With the advent of the emerging economies of the developing world, we see an added political impetus as countries such as China, India, and Brazil have aggressively moved to establish their own innovation platforms. In their turn, the developed countries of North America, Europe, and Japan are well aware that they must respond to the challenge posed by the emerging economies to their traditional leadership of scientific innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, B. T. and M. S. Gertler (2004) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems, in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biophoenix (2006) Opportunities in Stem Cell Research and Commercialisation. London: Business Insights, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standards lnstitution (2006) Guidance on Codes of Practice, Standardised Methods and Regulations for Cell-based Therapeutics from Basic Research to Clinical Application. PAS 83. London: British Standards Institution. Available at: http://www.bsi-global.com/en/Standards-and-Publications/Industry-Sectors/Healthcare/Regenerative-Medicine-/?recid=819, accessed 6 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. (2003) Hope against hype: accountability in biopasts, presents and futures, Science Studies, 16(2): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N. and M. Michael (2003) A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., B. Rappert and A. Webster (eds) (2000) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Technoscience. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrill Report (2012) Biotech sector scores wins in November. Burrill Report. Available at: http://www.burrillreport.com/article-the_january_2012_issue_of_the_burrill_report.html, accessed 22 February 2012.

  • Büthe, T. (2004) Governance through private authority? Non-state actors in world politics, Journal of International Affairs, 58: 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (2011) Clean energy and stem cell research among China’s science goals for 2020. Available at: http://english.cas.cn/Ne/CASE/201102/t20110209_64985.shtml, accessed 10 February 2012.

  • Cooke, P. (2001) New economy innovation systems: biotechnology in Europe and the USA, Industry and Innovation, 8(3): 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2003) The evolution of biotechnology in three continents: Schumpeterian or Penrosian? Editorial, European Planning Studies, 11(7): 757–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2004) Regional knowledge capabilities, embeddedness of firms and industry organisation: bioscience megacentres and economic geography, European Planning Studies, 11(7): 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Porte, C. (2002) Is the open method of coordination appropriate for organising activities at European level in sensitive policy areas?, European Law Journal, 8(1): 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Universities, Innovation and Skills (2008) Innovation Nation. Cm 7345. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdortf (1998) The endless transition: a ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations, Minerva, 36: 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29(2): 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) European Research Projects Involving Stem Cells in the 6th Framework Programme. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/pl/stemcells/pdf/stemcell_eu_research_fp6_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=bookmarks, accessed 22 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) State of the Innovation Union 2011. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2011) 849 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive of the President (2011) American Strategy for Innovation. Washington, DC: National Economic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (2007) Regenerative Technologies for Medicine and Biology — Contributions for a Strategic Funding Concept. Berlin: Capgemini Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, S. (2000) The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany, Research Policy, 29(2): 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Industry Analysts Inc. (2010) Regenerative medicine: a global strategic business report. Summary available at: http://www.prweb.com/releases/regenerative_medicine/stem_cell_research/prweb4657624.htm, accessed 7 February 2012.

  • Gov.cn (2006) Chinese Government’s official website. Available at: http://english.gov.cn/2006–01/09/content_151631.htm, accessed 6 February 2012.

  • Hansen, A. (2001) Biotechnology regulation: limiting or contributing to biotech development?, New Genetics and Society, 20(3): 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, G. and H. Liu (1993) Explaining the dynamics of the Southeast Asian political economy: state, society and the search for economic growth, World Politics, 45(4): 629–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, K. and D. Demeritt (2008) Democratising science? The politics of promoting biomedicine in Singapore’s developmental state, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(1): 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2003) Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance, American Political Science Review, 97: 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Wilson, W. and D. Mackay (2007) European approval system for advanced therapies: good news for patients and innovators alike, Regenerative Medicine, 2(1): 5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2004) States of Knowledge: Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. and P. le Gales (2010) Exploring governance in a multi-level polity: a policy instruments approach, West European Politics, 33(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, C. (2010) EU support for stem cell research. Presented at: EMA Workshop on Stem Cell-Based Therapies. London, UK, 10 May 2010. Available at: www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Presentation/2010/05/WC500090649.pdf, accessed 10 February 2012.

  • Kim, L. (1997) Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. G. (2006) $450 million budget set for stem cell research, The Korean Times, May 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. and D. Lehmkuhl (2002) Private actors and the state: internationalisation and changing patterns of governance, Governance, 15(1): 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, B. H. Thorsteinsdóttir, P. A. Singer and A. S. Daar et al. (2008) Harnessing stem cells for health needs in India, Cell Stem Cell, 3(1): 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord Sainsbury of Turville (2007) Race to the Top: A Review of Government’s Science and Innovation Policies. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., R. Hawkesley and A. Turner (2009) The Commercial Development of Cell Therapy: Lessons for the Future. University of Nottingham: Institute for Science and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, N. and C. O’Carroll (2010) Benchmarking Europe’s lab benches: how successful has the OMC been in research policy?, JCMS, 48(2): 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, D. S. et al. (2010) Cultivating regenerative medicine innovation in China, Regenerative Medicine, 5(1): 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (2012) Promissory futures and possible pasts: the dynamics of contemporary expectations in contemporary medicine, Biosocieties, 7: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures (2012) Stem Cell Research. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/embfet.htm, accessed 19 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Innovation Council (2011) Report to the People. National Innovation Council. Available at: http://www.innovationcouncil.gov.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=96:-report-to-the-people-2011&catid=8:report&Itemid=10, accessed 15 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institutes of Health (2012) Estimates of Funding for Various Research, Condition and Disease Categories. Available at: http://report.nih.gov/rcdc/categories/, accessed 19 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2012) Science and Engineering Indicators2012. Washington, DC: National Science Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2012) New Report Outlines Trends in US Global Competitiveness in Science and Technology. Press Release 12–011. Washington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Adviser to the Prime Minister (2011) Towards A More Inclusive and Innovative India. Indian Innovation Council. Available at: http://www.innovationcouncil.gov.in/images/stories/report/Innovation_Strategy.pdf, accessed 14 February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onis, Z. (1991) The logic of the developmental state, Comparative Politics, 24(1): 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padma, T. V. (2005) India plans stem cell initiative, SciDevNet, 13 January. Available at: http://www.scidev.net/News/index.cfm?fuseaction=readnews&itemid=1849&language=1, accessed 9 February 2012.

  • Regent, S. (2003) The open method of coordination: a new supranational form of governance?, European Law Journal, 9(2): 190–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. (2009a) State strategies and the global knowledge economy: the geopolitics of regenerative medicine, Geopolitics, 14: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. (2009b) China, globalisation and health biotechnology innovation: venture capital and the adaptive state, East Asian Science and Technology: An International Journal, 3(4): 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. (2011) Biomedical innovation and the geopolitics of patenting: China and the struggle for future territory, East Asian Science and Technology: An International Journal, 5: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. and S. Hogarth (2011) The dynamics of RM innovation in the EU: states, strategies and alliances, REMEDiE Project. Workpackage Four. Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. and R. Qiu (2009) Bioethical governance and basic stem cell science: China and the global biomedicine economy, Science and Public Policy, 36(1): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Stem Cell Initiative (2005) Report and Recommendations. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (2006) 2020: A New Vision — A Future for Regenerative Medicine. Washington: US Department of health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in Asian Industrialisation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldby, C. and B. Salter (2008) Global governance in human embryonic stem cell science: standardisation and bioethics in research and patenting, Studies in Ethics Law and Technology, 2(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. (2003) Guiding globalisation in East Asia: new roles for old developmental states, in L. Weiss (ed) States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–168.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2011) Betting on Biotech: Innovation and the Limits of Asia’s Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Brian Salter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salter, B. (2013). Governing Innovation Paths in Regenerative Medicine: The European and Global Struggle for Political Advantage. In: Webster, A. (eds) The Global Dynamics of Regenerative Medicine. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026552_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics