Skip to main content

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to show how the use of Web 2.0 tools in foreign language learning CLIL situations, besides increasing foreign language exposure and use, enhances the levels of student satisfaction, motivation, and confidence, all of which are crucial for communicative, lifelong foreign language learning. We will illustrate how the use of Web 2.0 technology can connect students across grade levels and schools as collaborators and peer tutors of school subject matter in English. Learners are generally used to traditional, individual activities such as reading articles, books or short stories, but may be unfamiliar with the type of collaborative learning activities that Web 2.0 supports. By preparing material to teach each other and assessing or reworking peer output, students experience a variety of cognitive and communicative activities that stimulate reflection, critical thinking, and self-directed, self-organised learning. This chapter describes ways to motivate learners to get involved in these new Web 2.0 activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5): 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonifacio, M., Bouquet, P., Mameli, G. and Nori, M. (2003). Peer-Mediated Distributed Knowledge Management. University of Trento. Department of Information and Communication Technology. Available at http://www.dit.unitn.it [Accessed 6/12/13].

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, A. (2007). Immersion et compréhension en lecture. In Puren, L. and Babault, S. (eds), L’Éducation au-delá des frontières. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 215–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D., Hood, P. and Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2008). 2008 Joint Council/Commission Report on the implementation of the Education & Training 2010 work programme, ‘Delivering lifelong learning for knowledge, creativity and innovation’ Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/nationalreport08/council_En.pdf [Accessed 6/12/13].

  • Eurydice (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning at School in Europe. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/languages/documents/studies/clil-at-school-in-europe_En.pdf [Accessed 6/12/13].

  • Isidori, M. V. (2003). Apprendimento in rete. Innovazioni e sperimentazione psicopedagogica e didattica. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, A. (1994). Apprendimento collaborativo basato sul computer, TD Tecnologie Didattiche n.4, Menabò Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, L. (1999). Lezioni di Didattica. Roma: Anicia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serragiotto, G. (2006). La valutazione del prodotto CLIL. In Ricci Garotti (a cura di), Il futuro si chiama CLIL: Una ricerca interregionale sull’insegnamento veicolare. Trento: IPRASE del Trentino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra, J. (2008). Assessment of bilingual in the Basque Country. In Cenoz, J. (ed.), Teaching Through Basque: Achievements and Challenges. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L. and Gao, Y. (2008). Why and how CLIL works. Available at anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_anglist/weitere_Uploads/Views/Views_0703.pdf [Accessed 6/12/13].

  • Webb, N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: a research summary. In Slavin, R., Sharan, S., Kagan, S., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C. and Schmuck, R. (eds), Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydatis, W. (2009). Deutsch-Englische Zűge in Berlin. (DEZIBEL): Eine Evaluation des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts an Gymnasien. Frankfurt a M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Fabrizio Maggi, Maurizia Cherubin and Enrique García Pascual

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maggi, F., Cherubin, M., Pascual, E.G. (2014). Using Web 2.0 Tools in CLIL. In: Garton, S., Graves, K. (eds) International Perspectives on Materials in ELT. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023315_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics