Abstract
Consider the following scenario: Jo and Sam are acquaintances. They have met on several occasions through mutual friends and got along perfectly fine, but they do not know each other well. Sam moved to London a few months ago and now by coincidence Jo is doing the same thing. Jo does not know anyone else in London any better than Sam, and so Jo asks Sam — via e-mail or Facebook, or something like that — whether it would be OK to stay for a few days while looking for a flat to rent. Sam replies that it will be no problem, adding that if Jo would like to, they can both sleep in Sam’s bed, since the alternative is that Jo will have to sleep on the floor. Jo replies that the floor will be fine. When Jo arrives in London, Sam again tries to hint at the possibility of their having sex. Every time this happens, Jo tries to make it clear that this is not going to happen. Sam’s overtures are of the kind that can almost plausibly be written off when they fail as only joking, just banter between friends. Jo’s lack of interest, however, should be perfectly clear. Jo finds a flat, but cannot move in until a few days later. To celebrate, Sam persuades Jo to go out to dinner. Sam buys drinks for Jo throughout the evening, and when they get home once again suggests that they have sex. Jo is not so drunk as to have had a change of mind, and goes to sleep on the floor. Later in the night, Jo wakes up to find that Sam is also on the floor and has commenced having penetrative, penis-in-vagina sex with Jo.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. 2005. ‘Negotiating sex’, Southern California Law Review, 78, 1401–1438.
Archard, D. 1997. ‘A nod’s as good as a wink: consent, convention and reasonable belief’, Legal Theory, 3, 273–290.
Archard, D. 1998. Sexual Consent. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Breiding et al. 2014. ‘Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization-National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011’ Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/, 63, 1018.
Conly, S. 2004. ‘Seduction, Rape and coercion’, Ethics, 115, 96–121.
Norwegian Ministry of Justice. 2006. The General Civil Penal Code, unofficial translation into English. Available at: http://www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-1902052 2–010-eng.pdf.
Primoratz, I. 1999. Ethics and Sex. Oxford: Routledge.
Sexual Offences Act 2003. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/pdfs/ukpga_20030042_en.pdf.
Shrage, L. 1989. ‘Should feminists oppose prostitution?’, Ethics 99, 347–361.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Iain Law
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, I. (2015). Women Raping Men. In: Marway, H., Widdows, H. (eds) Women and Violence. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015129_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137015129_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-58082-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01512-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)