Abstract
Hegemonic constructions of masculinity constitute men as the quintessential neoliberal citizen: able, autonomous, in control, independent and rational. While masculinity studies have challenged such narrow expressions, disability remains largely ignored. Too often, disability is viewed as undoing the very processes associated with masculinity. To be disabled a man is to occupy a bifurcated societal position. Nevertheless, recent developments in critical disability studies have drawn attention to the ways in which disability expands identities beyond their usual negative constitution. In this chapter, we will draw on a qualitative research project to explore the ways in which disability crips 1 masculinity research in affirmative and exciting ways. We see our task as wheeling back from the doings of qualitative research in order to expose the complexities and possibilities offered by disabled masculinities. We suggest that disability extends critical masculinity studies’ possibilities for such transgressive research encounters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abberley, P. (1987) ‘The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability’, Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5–19.
Arthur, S. and G. Zarb (1995a) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 3’, Disabled People and the Citizen’s Charter, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Zarb/meas%20work%20paper%203.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.
Arthur, S. and G. Zarb (1995b) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 4’, Barriers to Employment for Disabled People, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Zarb/barriers%20to%20employment.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.
Banister, P., G. Bunn, E. Burman, J. Daniels, P. Duckett, D. Goodley, R. Lawthom, I. Parker, K. Runswick-Cole, J. Sixsmith, S. Smailes, C. Tindall and P. Whelan (2011) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide, 2nd edn (London: McGraw Hill).
Barnes, C. (1995) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Hopes and Reservations’, Disability Research Unit, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/Barnes/measuring%20dis.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.
Begum, N. and G. Zarb (1996) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 5’, Measuring Disabled People’s Involvement in Local Planning, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Begum/local%20planning.pdf, date accessed 25 April 2009.
Campbell, F.K. (2009) Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities (Cambridge: Polity).
Danieli, A. and C. Woodhams (2005) ‘Emancipatory Research Methodology and Disability: A Critique’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 281–296.
Ferguson, P.M., D.L. Ferguson and S.J. Taylor (eds) (1992) Interpreting Disability: A Qualitative Reader (New York: Teachers College Press).
Garland Thomson, R. (2005) ‘Feminist Disability Studies’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1557–1587.
Ghai, A. (2006) (Dis)embodied Form: Issues of Disabled Women (Delhi: Shakti Books).
Goodley, D. (2011) Critical Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (London: Sage).
Harding, S. (1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity?”’ in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds) Feminist Epistemologies (London: Routledge).
Harris, Greg (1998) ‘Compulsory Masculinity, Britain, and the Great War: The Literary-Historical Work of Pat Barker’, Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 39, 290–304.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2009) Unimaginable Bodies: Intellectual Disability, Performance and Becomings (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers).
Killacky, J.R. (2004) ‘Careening toward Kensho: Ruminations on Disability and Community’ in B. Guter and J. Killacky (eds) Queer Crips: Disabled Gay Men and Their Stories (New York: Haworth Press).
Langness, L.L., and H.G. Levine (eds) (1986) Culture and Retardation (Kluwer: D. Reidel Publishing Company).
Liddiard, K. (2012) ‘(S)Exploring Disability’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Warwick.
Mallett, R. (2007) ‘Critical Correctness: Exploring the Capacities of Contemporary Disability Criticism’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.
Marks, D. (1999) Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives (London: Routledge).
Martin, J., H. Meltzer and D. Elliott (1988) Report 1: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults (London: HMSO).
Martin, J. and A. White (1988) Report 2: The Financial Circumstances of Disabled Adults in Private Households (London: HMSO).
McLaughlin, J., D. Goodley, E. Clavering, and P. Fisher (2008) Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice (London: Palgrave).
McRuer, R. (2006) ‘Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence’ in L. Davis (ed.) The Critical Disability Studies Reader, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).
Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability (London: The Women’s Press).
Morris, J. (ed.) (1996) Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability (London: The Women’s Press).
Odette, C. (1999) ‘Consumer Perspective: Butchdom and Disability’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 93–96.
Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
Olkin, R. (2002) ‘Could You Hold the Door for Me? Including Disability in Diversity’, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 130–137.
Quinlan, K., L. Bowleg and S. Faye Ritz (2008) ‘Virtually Invisible Women: Women with Disabilities in Mainstream Psychological Theory and Research’, Review of Disability Studies, 4, 4–17.
Reeve, D. (2002) ‘Negotiating Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and Their Influence on Identity Constructions’, Disability and Society, 17, 493–508.
Reeve, D. (2008) ‘Negotiating Disability in Everyday Life: The Experience of Psycho-Emotional Disablism’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Roussel, J.F. and C. Downs (2007) ‘Epistemological Perspectives on Concepts of Gender and Masculinity/Masculinities’, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 178–196.
Salvage, A. and G. Zarb (1995) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Gaining Access’, Disabled People and the Physical Environment, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/Salvage/meas%20work%20paper%202.pdf, date accessed 30 April 2009.
Shakespeare, T. (1997) ‘Rules of Engagement: Changing Disability Research’ in L. Barton and M. Oliver (eds) Disability Studies: Past Present and Future (Leeds: The Disability Press).
Shakespeare, T. (1999) ‘The Sexual Politics of Disabled Masculinity’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 53–64.
Shakespeare, T. (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs (London: Routledge).
Shakespeare, T., K. Gillespie-Sells and D. Davies (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability (London: Cassells).
Shildrick, M. and J. Price (1999) ‘Openings on the Body: A Critical Introduction’ in J. Price and M. Shildrick (eds) Feminist Theory and the Body (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Smith, B. and A.C. Sparkes (2005) ‘Men, Sport, Spinal Cord Injury and Narratives of Hope’, Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1095–1105.
Sparkes, A.C. and B. Smith (2002) ‘Sport, Spinal Cord Injuries, Embodied Masculinities, and Narrative Identity Dilemmas’, Men and Masculinities, 4, 258–285.
Tepper, M.S. (1999) ‘Letting Go of Restrictive Notions of Manhood: Male Sexuality, Disability and Chronic Illness’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 37–52.
Thomas, C. (1999) Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability (Buckingham: The Open University Press).
Thomas, C. (2007) Sociologies of Disability, ‘Impairment’, and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Critical Disability Studies and Medical Sociology (London: Palgrave).
Wendell, S. (1996) The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability (New York: Routledge).
Wilkerson, A. (2002) ‘Disability, Sex Radicalism and Political Agency’, NWSA Journal, 14, 33–57.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Dan Goodley and Katherine Runswick-Cole
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). Disability: Cripping Men, Masculinities and Methodologies. In: Pini, B., Pease, B. (eds) Men, Masculinities and Methodologies. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005731_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005731_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43483-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00573-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)