Skip to main content

Disability: Cripping Men, Masculinities and Methodologies

  • Chapter
Men, Masculinities and Methodologies

Abstract

Hegemonic constructions of masculinity constitute men as the quintessential neoliberal citizen: able, autonomous, in control, independent and rational. While masculinity studies have challenged such narrow expressions, disability remains largely ignored. Too often, disability is viewed as undoing the very processes associated with masculinity. To be disabled a man is to occupy a bifurcated societal position. Nevertheless, recent developments in critical disability studies have drawn attention to the ways in which disability expands identities beyond their usual negative constitution. In this chapter, we will draw on a qualitative research project to explore the ways in which disability crips 1 masculinity research in affirmative and exciting ways. We see our task as wheeling back from the doings of qualitative research in order to expose the complexities and possibilities offered by disabled masculinities. We suggest that disability extends critical masculinity studies’ possibilities for such transgressive research encounters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abberley, P. (1987) ‘The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability’, Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, S. and G. Zarb (1995a) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 3’, Disabled People and the Citizen’s Charter, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Zarb/meas%20work%20paper%203.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.

  • Arthur, S. and G. Zarb (1995b) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 4’, Barriers to Employment for Disabled People, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Zarb/barriers%20to%20employment.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.

  • Banister, P., G. Bunn, E. Burman, J. Daniels, P. Duckett, D. Goodley, R. Lawthom, I. Parker, K. Runswick-Cole, J. Sixsmith, S. Smailes, C. Tindall and P. Whelan (2011) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide, 2nd edn (London: McGraw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (1995) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Hopes and Reservations’, Disability Research Unit, School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/Barnes/measuring%20dis.pdf, date accessed 1 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begum, N. and G. Zarb (1996) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Working Paper 5’, Measuring Disabled People’s Involvement in Local Planning, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Begum/local%20planning.pdf, date accessed 25 April 2009.

  • Campbell, F.K. (2009) Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danieli, A. and C. Woodhams (2005) ‘Emancipatory Research Methodology and Disability: A Critique’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, P.M., D.L. Ferguson and S.J. Taylor (eds) (1992) Interpreting Disability: A Qualitative Reader (New York: Teachers College Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland Thomson, R. (2005) ‘Feminist Disability Studies’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1557–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghai, A. (2006) (Dis)embodied Form: Issues of Disabled Women (Delhi: Shakti Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2011) Critical Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity?”’ in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds) Feminist Epistemologies (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Greg (1998) ‘Compulsory Masculinity, Britain, and the Great War: The Literary-Historical Work of Pat Barker’, Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 39, 290–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2009) Unimaginable Bodies: Intellectual Disability, Performance and Becomings (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Killacky, J.R. (2004) ‘Careening toward Kensho: Ruminations on Disability and Community’ in B. Guter and J. Killacky (eds) Queer Crips: Disabled Gay Men and Their Stories (New York: Haworth Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langness, L.L., and H.G. Levine (eds) (1986) Culture and Retardation (Kluwer: D. Reidel Publishing Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddiard, K. (2012) ‘(S)Exploring Disability’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallett, R. (2007) ‘Critical Correctness: Exploring the Capacities of Contemporary Disability Criticism’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. (1999) Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., H. Meltzer and D. Elliott (1988) Report 1: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and A. White (1988) Report 2: The Financial Circumstances of Disabled Adults in Private Households (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J., D. Goodley, E. Clavering, and P. Fisher (2008) Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice (London: Palgrave).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006) ‘Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence’ in L. Davis (ed.) The Critical Disability Studies Reader, 2nd edn (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability (London: The Women’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (ed.) (1996) Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability (London: The Women’s Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odette, C. (1999) ‘Consumer Perspective: Butchdom and Disability’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, R. (2002) ‘Could You Hold the Door for Me? Including Disability in Diversity’, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, K., L. Bowleg and S. Faye Ritz (2008) ‘Virtually Invisible Women: Women with Disabilities in Mainstream Psychological Theory and Research’, Review of Disability Studies, 4, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, D. (2002) ‘Negotiating Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and Their Influence on Identity Constructions’, Disability and Society, 17, 493–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, D. (2008) ‘Negotiating Disability in Everyday Life: The Experience of Psycho-Emotional Disablism’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, J.F. and C. Downs (2007) ‘Epistemological Perspectives on Concepts of Gender and Masculinity/Masculinities’, The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 178–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvage, A. and G. Zarb (1995) ‘Measuring Disablement in Society: Gaining Access’, Disabled People and the Physical Environment, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archiveuk/Salvage/meas%20work%20paper%202.pdf, date accessed 30 April 2009.

  • Shakespeare, T. (1997) ‘Rules of Engagement: Changing Disability Research’ in L. Barton and M. Oliver (eds) Disability Studies: Past Present and Future (Leeds: The Disability Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (1999) ‘The Sexual Politics of Disabled Masculinity’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T., K. Gillespie-Sells and D. Davies (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability (London: Cassells).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. and J. Price (1999) ‘Openings on the Body: A Critical Introduction’ in J. Price and M. Shildrick (eds) Feminist Theory and the Body (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and A.C. Sparkes (2005) ‘Men, Sport, Spinal Cord Injury and Narratives of Hope’, Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1095–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A.C. and B. Smith (2002) ‘Sport, Spinal Cord Injuries, Embodied Masculinities, and Narrative Identity Dilemmas’, Men and Masculinities, 4, 258–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, M.S. (1999) ‘Letting Go of Restrictive Notions of Manhood: Male Sexuality, Disability and Chronic Illness’, Sexuality and Disability, 17, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1999) Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability (Buckingham: The Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2007) Sociologies of Disability, ‘Impairment’, and Chronic Illness: Ideas in Critical Disability Studies and Medical Sociology (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S. (1996) The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, A. (2002) ‘Disability, Sex Radicalism and Political Agency’, NWSA Journal, 14, 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Dan Goodley and Katherine Runswick-Cole

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). Disability: Cripping Men, Masculinities and Methodologies. In: Pini, B., Pease, B. (eds) Men, Masculinities and Methodologies. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005731_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics