Abstract
Over the last decade, ethics has been institutionalised as an integral part of nanotechnology research. This integration was a response to the alert ‘Mind the gap’, which was launched in 2003. ‘As the science leaps ahead, the ethics lags behind. There is danger of derailing NT [nanotechnology] if the study of ethical, legal, and social implications does not catch up with the speed of scientific development’ (Mnyusiwalla et al. 2003). One year later, the report of the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering in Great Britain Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Uncertainties also pointed to the gap between technology and ethics, and made a similar claim about the gap between science and the public (Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering 2004).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further reading
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
References
Adams, B. and Groves, C. (2007) Future Matters, Action, Knowledge (Leiden: Brill).
Akrich, M. (1992) ‘The De-Scription of Technical Objects’, in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Bensaude Vincent, B. (2009) Les vertiges de la technoscience (Paris: Éditions la Découverte).
Bensaude, V.B. and Nurock, V. (2010) ‘Ethique des nanotechnologies’, in Hirsch, E. (ed.) Traité de bioéthique, vol. 1, pp. 355–69 (Paris: érès).
Bensaude, V.B., Loeve, S., Nordmann, A., and Schwarz, A. (2011) ‘Matters of Interest: The Objects of Research in Science and Technoscience’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42(2): 365–83.
Carrier, M., Howard, D. and Kourany, J. (eds) (2008) The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice. Science & Values Revisited (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Dewey, J. (1939) Theory of Valuation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Dewey, J. (1958) Experience and Nature (New York: Dover Publications).
Drexler, E. K. (1986) Engines of Creation. (New York, Anchor Books).
Dupuy, J.-P. (2004) ‘Complexity and Uncertainty’, in Nordmann, A. (ed.) Foresighting the New Technology Wave, High-Level Expert Group (Brussels: European Commission).
Dupuy, J.-P. (2008) ‘Foreword: The Double Language of Science, and Why it is so Difficult to Have a Proper Public Debate About the Nanotechnology Program’, in Allhoff, F. and Lin, P. (eds) Nanotechnology and Society. Current Emerging Ethical Issues (New York: Springer).
Dupuy, J.-P. (2009) ‘Technology and Metaphysics’, in Kyrre, J., Olsen, B., Pedersen, S. A., and Hendricks, V. F. (eds) A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, Blackwell Companions to Philosophy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).
Echeverria, J. (2003) La revolucion tecnoscientifica (Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Economica).
European Union High-Level Expert Group (2004) Foresighting the New Technology Wave, Converging Technologies – Shaping the Future of European Societies (Brussels: European Union).
Forman, P. (2007) ‘The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity and of Ideology in the History of Technology’, History and Technology, 23(1/2): 1–152.
Harré, R. (2003) ‘The Materiality of Instruments in a Metaphysics for Experiments’, in Radder, H. (ed.) Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Hottois, G. (1984) Le signe et la technique. La philosophie à l’épreuve de la technique (Paris: Aubier).
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Merchant, C. (2003) Reinventing Eden; The Fate of Nature in Western Culture (New York; London: Routledge).
Merton, R. K. (1986) ‘The Ethos of Science [1942]’, in Sztompka, P. (ed.) On Social Structure and Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Mnyusiwalla, A., Daar, A. S., and Singer P.A. (2003) ‘Mind the Gap: Science and Ethics in Nanotechnology’, Nanotechnology, 14: R9–R13.
Nordmann, A. (2007) ‘If and Then: A Critique of Speculative Nanoethics’, Nanoethics, 1: 31–46.
Nordmann, A. (2010) ‘A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience’, Poiesis & Praxis, 7(1): 5–15.
Nordmann, A., Radder, H., and Schiemann, G. (2011) Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press).
Rip, A. (2009) ‘Mind the Gap Revisited’, Nature Nanotechnology, May: 273–4.
Roco, M., Bainbridge, W., and Alivisastos, P. (2000) Nanotechnology [NT] Research Directions. IWGN Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience Workshop Report (Dordrecht; Boston, MA: Kluwer).
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) ‘Nanoscience, Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Uncertainties’, available at http://www.nanotec.org.uk/ (accessed January 2013).
Sauvage, J.-P. (2008) ‘Commentaire sur l’ensemble des contributions’, in Bensaude, V., Larrère, B. R., and Nurock, V. (eds) Bionano-éthique, perspectives critiques sur les bnionanotechnologies (Paris: Vuibert).
Schuurbiers, D. and Fisher, E. (2009) ‘Lab-Scale Intervention’, EMBO Reports, 10(5): 424–7.
Smalley, R. (2001) ‘Of Chemistry, Love and Nanobots, How Soon Will We See the Nanometer-Scale Robots Envisaged by K. Eric Drexler and Other Molecular Nanotechnologists? The Simple Answer is Never’, Scientific American, 285(3): 76–7.
Swierstra, T., van Est, R., and Boenink, M. (2009) ‘Taking Care of the Symbolic Order. How Converging Technologies Challenge our Concepts’, Nanoethics, 3: 269–80.
Timmermans, J., Zhao Y., and van den Hoven, J. (2011) ‘Ethics and Nanopharmacy: Value Sensitive Design’, Nanoethics, 5: 269–83.
Whitesides, G. M. (2001) ‘The Once and Future Nanomachine’, Scientific American 285(3): 78–83.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2008) ‘Design Ethics and the Morality of Technological Artifacts’, in Vermaas, P., Kroes, P. A., Light, A., and Moore, S. (eds) Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture (Heidelberg: Springer).
Williams, B. (1981) Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ziman, J. (1994) ‘Proprietary, Local, Authoritarian, Commissioned Expert’, In: Ziman Prometheus Bound. Science in a Steady State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Ziman, J. (1996) ‘Postacademic Science: Constructing Knowledge With Networks and Norms’, Science Studies, 1: 68–80.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2013). Which Focus for an Ethics in Nanotechnology Laboratories?. In: van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (eds) Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43407-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00293-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)