Skip to main content
  • 1422 Accesses

Abstract

Factor analysis is a technique that is based on correlations. There are two types of factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used, as the name suggests, to investigate possible relationships between variables, while Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is used to confirm or reject hypothesised relationships between variables. EFA and CFA are similar in their function concerning the reduction of data, but the execution and reporting of the results are very different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention in exploratory factor analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. doi: 10.1177/1094428104263675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Sources of examples

  • Peng, J. E. (2009). Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English in Chinese EFL university classrooms a mixed methods approach. PhD, University of Sydney, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2011). Subcomponents of second language aptitude and second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 95(2). doi: DOI: 10.1111/1.1540-4781.2011.01176.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., & Mareschal, C. J. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winke, P. (2011). Evaluating the validity of a high stakes test: Why teachers’ perceptions matter. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 628–660. doi: 10.5054/tq.2011.268063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, L. J. (2006b). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language RELC Journal, 37(3), 308–328. doi: 0.1177/0033688206071315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Lindy Woodrow

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodrow, L. (2014). Writing about Factor Analysis. In: Writing about Quantitative Research in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369955_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics