Skip to main content

Structural Isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a Linguistic Area

  • Chapter
Linguistic Areas

Abstract

In historical times, the wider Cape region, including the Orange River area, hosted languages of two very different Khoisan language families, namely of Tuu (specifically its !Ui branch) and Khoe (specifically its Khoekhoe branch). Khoekhoe displays a number of linguistic features that do not exist in the languages of its genealogical sister, the Kalahari branch of Khoe. A comparison beyond the limits of this family shows that the innovative structures in Khoekhoe often have a great similarity to properties of the Tuu family, particularly its !Ui branch. This observation leads to the hypothesis that the genuine linguistic character of Khoekhoe vis-à-vis Kalahari Khoe is to a considerable extent the result of contact with Tuu languages, which have been in the relevant area for a longer time. This chapter will (a) outline briefly the historical context of the contact situation; (b) identify commonalities of the two groups, with a particular focus on the assumed Tuu substrate interference in the morphosyntax of Khoekhoe; and (c) discuss a few implications of the data for the population history in southern Africa and for historical and contact linguistics in general.

This chapter was presented as a paper on the following occasions: 14. Deutscher Afri kanistentag in Hamburg (11 October 2000); 23. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft in Leipzig (1 March 2001); Substrate Workshop at the Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie Leipzig (20 October 2001); Annual Conference of the North West Centre for Linguistics (NWCL): Linguistic Areas, Convergence and Language Change in Manchester (2 November 2002); and International Symposium on Khoisan Languages and Linguistics in Memory of Jan W. Snyman in Riezlern (6 January 2003). Thanks to W. Haacke for his comments on a draft version. Examples are cited in the original orthography, except for !Ui languages, for which I use a modified transliteration. The abbreviations in glosses are: ad addressee, appl applicative, c common, comp complementizer, conn clause connector, cop copula, d dual, decl declarative, del deictic, dim diminutive, dsbj deposed subject, e exclusive, f feminine, fut future, ipfv imperfective, M masculine, mpo multipurpose oblique, neg negative, obj object, obl obligation, P plural, pass passive, pq polar question, pro pronoun, prop proper name, pst past, q question, quqt quotative, rel relative, relv relevance, s singular, sbj subject, sp speaker, subj subjunctive, stat stative, tr transitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 130.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beach, Douglas M. (1938) The Phonetics of the Hottentot Language (Cambridge: Heffer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besten, Hans den (2001) ‘The Complex Ancestry of the Afrikaans Associative Constructions’, in Carstens, Adelia and Heinrich Grebe (eds), Taallandskap: Huldigingsbundel vir Christo van Rensburg (Pretoria: J. L. Van Schaik), pp. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besten, Hans den (2002) ‘Khoekhoe Syntax and its Implications for L2 Acquisition of Dutch and Afrikaans’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleek, Dorothea F. (1928–30) ‘Bushman Grammar: A Grammatical Sketch of the Language of the I xam-ka-!k’e’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol. 19, pp. 81–98; vol. 20, pp. 161–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleek, Dorothea F. (1936) ‘Special Speech of Animals and Moon Used by the 1 Xam Bushmen from Material Collected by Dr. W. H. I. Bleek and Miss L. C. Lloyd Between 1870 and 1880’, Bantu Studies, vol. 10, pp. 163–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleek, Dorothea F. (1956) A Bushman Dictionary, American Oriental Series, 41 (New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleek, Wilhelm H. I. and Lucy C. Lloyd (1911) Specimens of Bushmen Folklore (London: George Allen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boretzky, Norbert (1983) Kreolsprachen, Substrate, und Sprachwandel (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenzinger, Matthias and Christa König (eds.) (forthcoming) Khoisan Languages and Linguistics: The Riezlem Symposium 2003, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 17 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budack, K. F. R. (1986) ‘Die Klassifikation der Khwe-khwen (Naman) in Südwestafrika’, in Voßen, Rainer and Klaus Keuthmann (eds), Contemporary Studies on Khoisan, vol 1, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 5 (Hamburg: Helmut Buske), pp. 107–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempwolff, Otto (1927) ‘Die Hervorhebung von Satzteilen als Anlass zur Verwendung besonderer Wortformen’, In Franz Boas, Otto Dempwolff, G. Panconcelli-Calzia, A. Werner and D. Westrmann (eds), Festschrift Meinhof (Glückstadt/Hamburg: J. J. Augustin), pp. 73–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempwolff, Otto (1934/5) ‘Einführung in die Sprache der Nama-Hottentotten’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen vol. 25, pp. 30–66, 89–134, 188–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Patrick J. (n.d.) Ju/’hoan Grammar. Unpublished ms. (Windhoek: Nyae Nyae Development Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963) The Languages of Africa (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (1998) ‘The Kalahari Basin as an Object of Areal Typology: A First Approach’, in Schladt (ed.), 137–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (1999) ‘Head-initial Meets Head-final: Nominal Suffixes in Eastern and Southern Bantu from a Historical Perspective’, Studies in African Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 49–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (2001) Quotative Constructions in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Habilitation thesis, Institut für Afrikanistik, University of Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (2002) ‘Die Entlehnung pronominaler Elemente des Khoekhoe aus dem !Ui-Taa’, In Theda Schumann, Mechthild Reh, Roland Kiessling and Ludwig Gerhardt (eds), Aktuelle Forschungen zu afrikanischen Sprachen: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 14. Afrikanistentag, Hamburg, 11–14 October 2000 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (2004a) ‘Reconstruction Through “de-construction”: The Marking of Person, Gender, and Number in the Khoe Family and Kwadi’, Diachronica, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 251–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (2004b) ‘“Tuu”: A New Name for the Southern Khoisan Family’, in Tom Güldemann (ed.), Studies in Tuu (Southern Khoisan). University of Leipzig Papers on Africa, Languages and Literatures, 23 (Leipzig: Institut für Afrikanistik, University of Leipzig), pp. 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming a) ‘Complex Pronominals in Tuu and Ju With Special Reference to Their Historical Significance’, Afrika und Übersee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming b) ‘Syntax: 1 Xam of Strandberg’, in Voßen (ed.), The Khoisan Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming c) ‘Phonology: Other Tuu Languages’, in Vossen (ed.), The Khoisan Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming d) ‘Greenberg’s “case” for Khoisan: The Morphological Evidence’, in Vossen, Rainer (ed.), Problems of linguistic-historical reconstruction in Africa, Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, 19 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming e) ‘Person-gender-number Marking from ProtoKhoe-Kwadi to its Descendents: A Rejoinder With Particular Reference to Language Contact’, in König, Christa and Rainer Vossen (eds), Festschrift for Bernd Heine, Routledge African Linguistics Series (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom and Rainer Vossen (2000) ‘Khoisan’, in Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse (eds), African Languages: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güldemann, Tom and Edward D. Elderkin (forthcoming) ‘On External Genealogical Relationships of the Khoe Family’, in Brenzinger and König (eds), Khoisan Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1977) ‘The So-called “Personal Pronoun” in Nama’, in Anthony Traill (ed.), Khoisan Linguistic Studies 3, Communications 6. (Johannesburg: African Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand), pp. 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1992) ‘Compound Noun Phrases in Nama’, in Derek F. Gowlett (ed.), African Linguistic Contributions (Presented in Honour of Ernst Westphal). (Pretoria: Via Afrika), pp. 189–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1995) ‘Instances of Incorporation and Compounding in Khoekhoegowab (Nama/Damara)’, in Anthony Traill, Rainer Vossen and Megan Biesele (eds), The Complete Linguist: Papers in Memory of Patrick J. Dickens (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 339–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, W., E. Eiseb, and L. Namaseb (1997) ‘Internal and External Relations of Khoekhoe Dialects: A Preliminary Survey’, in W. Haacke and E. D. Elderkin (eds), Namibian Languages: Reports and Papers (Namibian African Studies, vol. 4) (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 125–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1999) The Tonology of Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara). Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 16 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagman, Roy S. (1977) Nama Hottentot Grammar, Language Science Monographs, 15 (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Theophilus (1870) ‘Beiträge zur Kunde der Hottentotten’, Jahresberichte des Vereins für Erdkunde zu Dresden 6/7, Anhang 1: 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Bernd (1999) The //Ani: Grammatical Notes and Texts. Khoisan Forum, Working Papers 11 (Cologne: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Bernd (2000) ‘Grammaticalization Chains Across Languages: An Example from Khoisan’, In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, Typological Studies in Language, 43 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 177–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins T., H. C. Harpendi, H. Gordon, M. M. Keraan and S. Johnston (1971) ‘Redcell-enzyme Polymorphisms in the Khoisan Peoples of Southern Africa’, American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 23, pp. 513–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilian-Hatz, Christa and Bernd Heine (1998) ‘On nominal gender marking in Kxoe’, in Schladt (ed.), Language Identity, 65–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, Oswin (1973/4) ‘Neuere Ergebnisse und Hypothesen der Sprachforschung in ihrer Bedeutung für die Geschichte Afrikas’, Paideuma, vol. 19/20, pp. 162–99. Lichtenberk, Frantisek (2000) ‘Inclusory pronominals’, Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maingard, Louis F. (1962) Korana Folktales (grammar and Texts) (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhof, Carl (1929) ‘Versuch einer grammatischen Skizze einer Buschmannsprache’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol. 19, pp. 161–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhof, Carl (1930) ‘Der Koranadialekt des Hottentottischen’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol 12 (Hamburg: Eckardt and Messtorff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi, Piero (1928/9) ‘Versuch einer Grammatik des 1 Xam-Buschmännischen’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen vol. 19, pp. 117–53, 188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, George T., A. B. Lane and Trefor Jenkins (1976) ‘Sero-genetic Studies on the Dama of South West Africa’, Annals of Human Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapera, Isaac (1926) ‘A Preliminary Consideration of the Relationship Between the Hottentots and the Bushmen’, South African Journal of Science, vol. 23, pp. 833–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schladt, Mathias (ed.) (1998) ‘Language, Identity, and Conceptualization Among the Khoisan’, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 15 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Leonhard (1907) Aus Namaland und Kalahari (Jena: Gustav Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, Leonhard (1928) Zur Kenntnis des Körpers der Hottentotten und Buschmänner (Jena: Gustav Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soodyall, Himla and Trefor Jenkins (1992) ‘Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in Khoisan Populations from Southern Africa’, Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 56: 315–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman (1988) Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, Anthony (1980) ‘Phonetic diversity in the Khoisan Languages’, in Jan W. Snyman (ed.), Bushman and Hottentot Linguistic Studies (Papers of Seminar Held on 27 July 1979), Miscellanea Congregalia 16 (Pretoria: University of South Africa), pp. 167–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, Anthony (1994) A !X65 dictionary, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 9 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, Anthony (1997) Extinct: South African Khoisan languages (CD and booklet). (Johannesburg: Department of Linguistics, University of the Witwatersrand).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, Anthony and Rainer Vossen (1997) ‘Sound Change in the Khoisan Languages: New Data on Click Loss and Click Replacement’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 21–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traill, Anthony and Hirosi Nakagawa (2000) ‘A Historical !X66–1 Gui Contact Zone: Linguistic and Other Relations’, in Herman M. Batibo and Joe Tsonope (eds), The State of Khoesan Languages in Botswana (Gaborone: Basarwa Languages Project), pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, Heinrich (1923) Die Bergdama, 2 vols. Hamburgische Universität, Abhand- lungen aus dem Gebiet der Auslandskunde 11/14 (Hamburg: L. Friederichsen).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, Heinrich (1934) Das alte Südwestafrika: Südwestafrikas Geschichte bis zum Tode Mahereros 1890 (Berlin: Mart in Warneck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Hessel (2003) ‘Nano Compounds’, in Brenzinger and König (eds), Khoisan Languages and Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossen, Rainer (1986) ‘Some Observations on Nominal Gender in Naro’, in Franz Rottland (ed.), Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Carl F. Hoffmann, Bayreuther Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 7 (Hamburg: Helmut Buske), pp. 373–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossen, Rainer (1997) Die Khoe-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 12 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossen, Rainer (ed.) (forthcoming) The Khoisan languages (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmann, J. C. (1857) Die Formenlehre der Namaquasprache: Ein Beitrag zur südafrika-nischen Linguistik (Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webley, Lita (1998) ‘Tracing the emergence of a pastoralist identity in Namaqualand’, in Andrew Bank (ed.), The proceedings of The Khoisan Identities and Cultural Heritage Conference; Held At the South African Museum, Cape Town, 12–16 July 1997 (Cape Town: The Institute for Historical Research, University of the Western Cape and Infosource), pp. 80–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, Royden, Anthony Manhire and John Parkington (1994) ‘Rock Painting and History in the South-western Cape’, in Thomas A. Dowson and David Lewis-Williams (eds), Contested Images: Diversity in Southern African Rock Art Research (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press), pp. 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Tom Güldemann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Güldemann, T. (2006). Structural Isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a Linguistic Area. In: Matras, Y., McMahon, A., Vincent, N. (eds) Linguistic Areas. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287617_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics