Skip to main content

They-Narratives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pronouns in Literature

Abstract

Third-person plural narration is a rather rare phenomenon in the area of fictional narratives. Thus, its forms are underexplored and its functions are, as yet, unidentified. This chapter begins an exploration of third-person plural narratives. In the first instance, they-narratives are related to and contrasted with the standard narrative forms discussed by Stanzel (1984) and Genette (1980) as well as the more recent typologies of you-narratives (Fludernik, 1994a; Richardson 2006) and we-narratives (Alber 2015; Richardson 2006). In a second step, the chapter then looks at and compares the they-passages in D.H. Lawrence’s ‘Things’ (1928), Georges Perec’s Les choses (1965), Ursula Le Guin’s ‘The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas’ (1973), and Maxine Swann’s Flower Children (2007). Ultimately, the chapter will reveal and list a number of reasons why a narrator might decide to talk about a whole group in the third-person plural (rather than single out individual characters).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alber, J. (2015) ‘The Social Minds in Factual and Fictional We-Narratives of the Twentieth Century’, Narrative 23(2): 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alber, J. (2016) Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (2001) ‘Georges Perec’s Experiments in Social Description’, Ethnography 2(1): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. (2005) ‘Through Ecofeminist Eyes: Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas’”, English Journal 94(6): 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coroneos, C. and T. Tate (2001) ‘Lawrence’s Tales’, in Fernihough, Anne (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to D.H. Lawrence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, L.T. (1989) ‘Narration and Story in Georges Perec’s Les choses’, Symposium 43(4): 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (1994a) ‘Introduction: Second-Person Narrative and Related Issues’, Style 28(3): 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (1994b) ‘Second-Person Narrative as a Test Case for Narratology: The Limits of Realism’ Style 28(3): 445–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fludernik, M. (2011) ‘The Category of “Person” in Fiction: You and We Narrative-Multiplicity and Indeterminacy of Reference’, in Olson, G. (ed.) Current Trends in Narratology, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 101–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method [‘Discours du récit’, Figures III, 1972], Trans. J.E. Lewin, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genette, G. (1988) Narrative Discourse Revisited, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, S. (1985) ‘The Morality of Creation: Dostoevsky and William James in Le Guin’s “Omelas”’, The Journal of Narrative Technique 15(1): 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. H. (1955) ‘Things [1928]’, The Complete Short Stories of D.H. Lawrence: Volume III, London: Heinemann, pp. 844–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, U. (1973) The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, Mankato, MN: Creative Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2008a) ‘A Contextual View of Narrative Fiction in the First Person Plural’, Narrative 16(1): 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2008b) ‘Dialogue and Authoritativeness in “We” Fictional Narratives: A Bakhtinian Approach’, Partial Answers 6(1): 135–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. (2008c) ‘We Are You: The Plural and the Dual in “We” Fictional Narratives’, Journal of Literary Semantics 37(1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, U. (1994) ‘Narrative ‘You’ Revisited’, Language and Style 23(4): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, U. (1996) ‘Telling Our Story: On “We” Literary Narratives’, Language and Literature 5: 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, U. (2000) ‘Telling in the Plural: From Grammar to Ideology’, Poetics Today 21(3): 591–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, J. (1984) Bright Lights, Big City, New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perec, G. (1965) Les Choses: une histoire des années soixante, Paris: Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (2006) Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. (2015) ‘Representing Social Minds: “We” and “They” Narratives, Natural and Unnatural’, Narrative 23(2): 200–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudé, G. (1964) The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanzel, F. K. (1984 [1979]) A Theory of Narrative, Trans. Charlotte Goedsche, with a Preface by Paul Hernadi, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, M. (2007) Flower Children, New York: Riverhead-Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alber, J. (2018). They-Narratives. In: Gibbons, A., Macrae, A. (eds) Pronouns in Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95317-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95317-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95316-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95317-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics