Skip to main content

Assortative Matching

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

This article reviews the simple economics of matching by characteristics. The goal is to understand sorting patterns in the marriage market and other matching markets by focusing on the nature of the gain from match and the mechanism of the market force of competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Becker, G. 1973. A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81: 813–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damiano, E., and H. Li. 2007. Price discrimination and efficient matching. Economic Theory 30: 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damiano, E., H. Li, and W. Suen. 2005. Unravelling of dynamic sorting. Review of Economic Studies 72: 1057–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C., and M. Beckmann. 1957. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica 25: 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M. 1993. The o-ring theory of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., and E. Maskin. 1996. Wage inequality and segregation by skill. Working Paper No. 5718. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legros, P., and A. Newman. 2002. Monotone matching in perfect and imperfect worlds. Review of Economic Studies 69: 925–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., and W. Suen. 2000. Risk-sharing, sorting, and early contracting. Journal of Political Economy 108: 1058–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. Rationalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 45: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., and X. Xing. 1994. Jumping the gun: Imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. American Economic Review 84: 992–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattinger, M. 1980. Capital and the distribution of labor earnings. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L., and M. Shubik. 1972. The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of Games Theory 1: 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimer, R., and L. Smith. 2000. Assortative matching and search. Econometrica 68: 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkis, D. 1998. Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. 1990. Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 19: 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hao, L. (2018). Assortative Matching. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2481

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics