Skip to main content

Electoral Turnout: Mobilization in All Its Diversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The 2012 French Election
  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

The presidential election is clearly the French electorate’s favorite. In 2012, the strong level of electoral mobilization beginning with the first round broke the cycle of record abstention levels in all the intermediary elections that took place during Nicolas Sarkozy’s five years in power with eight out of ten voters (81.5%) casting a vote. The percentage is a little lower than in 2007 (–2.2 points) but significantly higher than in the first round in 2002 when only 71.6% of voters turned out—a record abstention level for a presidential election. Nonetheless, the strong turnout in 2012 was lower than in 1965 (84.7%) and 1974 (84.2%). However, it was a little higher than the average level of turnout (80.3%) for the eight first rounds of presidential elections held to date under the Fifth Republic. In the second round, abstention dropped by 1.5% but the level of turnout remained two points lower than in the 2007 second round (82% and 84% respectively) and much lower than the record level reached in the second round of the 1974 presidential election (87.3%). During the two presidential elections won by François Mitterrand in 1981 and 1988, a very high percentage of French voters went to the polls—86.8% and 85%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, the bias inherent to this type of survey measuring electoral turnout cannot be excluded: on the one hand, a tendency not to declare a decision to abstain, and on the other hand, the effect of a sense of loyalty and conformity in answering the questions as the different survey waves take place. On these methodological points, see Viviane Le Hay, ‘The Panel Electoral Français 2007: Methodological Issues in Bruno Cautrès and Anne Muxel (Eds.), op. cit., 2009, pp. 225–249.

  2. 2.

    The data were not weighted, which may explain certain differences from final national results. However, analysis of individual longitudinal data and the reconstruction of electoral trajectories necessitate that any work done be carried out on raw data.

  3. 3.

    Cevipof post-electoral survey, June 2012.

Bibliography

  • Blais, André. 2000. To vote or not to vote: The merits and limits of rational choice. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 200p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braconnier, Céline, et Jean-Yves Dormagen. 2007. La Démocratie de l’abstention: aux origines de la démobilisation en milieu populaire. Paris: Gallimard, coll. « Folio. Actuel », 460p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1995. Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review 89: 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cautrès, Bruno, and Anne Muxel. eds. 2011. The new voter in Western Europe: France and Beyond, Europe in transition: The NYU European Studies Series. Basinstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 304p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark. 2004. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 277p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaxie, Daniel. 1978. Le cens caché: inégalités culturelles et ségrégation politique. Paris: Seuil, coll. « Sociologie politique », 268p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffré, Jérôme, et Anne Muxel. 2000. S’abstenir: hors du jeu ou dans le jeu politique? In Les Cultures politiques des Français, dir. Pierre Bréchon, Annie Laurent, et Pascal Perrineau. Paris: Presses de Science Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancelot, Alain. 1968. L’Abstentionnisme électoral en France. Paris: Armand Colin, XIV-290p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muxel, Anne. 2010. Avoir 20 ans en politique: les enfants du désenchantement. Paris: Seuil. 239p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toinet, Marie-France, et Françoise Subileau. 1993. Les Chemins de l’abstention: une comparaison franco-américaine. Paris: La Découverte, coll. « Textes à l’appui. Série Histoire contemporaine, 221p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E., and S.J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press, 158p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muxel, A. (2016). Electoral Turnout: Mobilization in All Its Diversity. In: Perrineau, P. (eds) The 2012 French Election. Europe in Transition - The NYU European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94957-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics