Skip to main content

Opportunism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management

Abstract

Opportunism is self-interest-seeking with guile and is a troublesome source of behavioural uncertainty (e.g. economic hold-up, adverse selection and moral hazard problems). An important lesson for the purpose of studying economic organization is that transactions, which are subject to ex post opportunism, will benefit if appropriate economic safeguards can be derived ex ante. Mutual sunk cost credible commitments facilitate ongoing relationships and adaptation. The upshot is that the study of (corporate) governance is concerned with the mitigation of all forms of contractual opportunism.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1971. Essays in the theory of risk bearing. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1974. The limits of organization. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K.R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought with industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management 17: 121–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K.R., and C.K. Prahalad. 1996. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 7: 477–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. 1971. Political and economic evaluation of social effects and externalities: Comment. In Frontiers of quantitative economics, ed. M. Intrilligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. 1958. Some experimental games. Management Science 5: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. 1996. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science 7: 470–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauss, C. 1952. Introduction. In The Prince, ed. C. Gauss. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., and K.B. Leffler. 1981. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy 89: 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., R.G. Crawford, and A.A. Alchian. 1978. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics 89: 615–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.T. 1992. The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal 13: 577–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.T. 2001. A resource-based theory of sustainable rents. Journal of Management 27: 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J.T. 2005. Economic foundations of strategy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J., and R. Radner. 1972. The theory of teams. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S.E. 1988. A legal basis for the firm. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4: 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.J. 1992. Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 120–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1947. Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1985. Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1983. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. American Economic Review 73: 519–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1990. Conversation. In Economics and sociology, ed. R. Swedberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1993. Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and Decision Economics 14: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1999. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 20: 1087–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph T. Mahoney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mahoney, J.T. (2016). Opportunism. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_588-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_588-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics