Skip to main content

Social Ontology and Social Critique: Toward a New Paradigm for Critical Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Social Ontology of Capitalism

Part of the book series: Political Philosophy and Public Purpose ((POPHPUPU))

Abstract

“Social Ontology and Social Critique” constructs a theory of critical social ontology as a means to diagnose the existence and nature of social pathologies in capitalist societies. The chapter begins by outlining four branches of social ontology that are common in the literature and then demonstrates how each can be dialectically synthesized to construct a critical theory of social ontology. The chapter then proceeds to show how this theory of a critical social ontology can serve as a theoretical foundation for a richer, more satisfying and more radical form of social critique by reconstructing the way in which the descriptive knowledge of social facts can also serve as normative judgments about their existing, empirical state of society. The chapter concludes by outlining how this critical social ontology can provide theorists with a more trenchant critique of capitalism and its social pathologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexy, R. (1990). A theory of practical discourse. In S. Benhabib & F. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy (pp. 151–192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F. (2005). Hegel. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. (2015). Towards a relational ontology: Philosophy’s other possibility. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhler, D. (1990). Transcendental pragmatics and critical morality: On the possibility and moral significance of a self-enlightenment of reason. In S. Benhabib & F. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy (pp. 111–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E. (2014). The concept of the social in uniting the humanities and social sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. (2013). Sociologia della relazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P., & Archer, M. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, D. (2015). Collective intentionality and causal powers. The Journal of Social Ontology, 1(2), 251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2011). The right to justification: Toward a constructivist theory of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2015). Noumenal power. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, C. (1978). Marx’s social ontology: Individuality and community in Marx’s theory of social reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff, R. (2013). Ontology revisited: Metaphysics in social and political philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S. S. (2007). Contradiction in motion: Hegel’s organic concept of life and value. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Wissenschaft der Logik (Vol. 2). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, D. (2004). Logical form and real totality: The authentic conceptual form of Hegel’s concept of the state. In R. Pippin & O. Höffe (Eds.), Hegel on ethics and politics (pp. 241–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, R. P. (2006). Substance, subject and infinity: A case study of the role of logic in Hegel’s system. In K. Deligiorgi (Ed.), Hegel: New directions (pp. 69–84). London: Acumen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlgate, S. (1995). The Unity of theoretical and practical spirit in Hegel’s concept of freedom. The Review of Metaphysics, 48(4), 859–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlgate, S. (2008). Hegel’s logic. In F. Besier (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Hegel and nineteenth-century philosophy (pp. 111–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosman, A. (2013). The activity of being: An essay on Aristotle’s ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kreines, J. (2015). Reason in the world: Hegel’s metaphysics and its philosophical appeal. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loux, M. J. (1978). Substance and attribute: A study in ontology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E. J. (2006). The four-fold ontology: A metaphysics for natural science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (1980). The ontology of social being. Volume 3: Labor (D. Fernbach, Trans.) London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1961). Economic and philosophical manuscripts in Erich Fromm, Marx’s concept of man. New York: Frederick Ungar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1977). Capital (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pippin, R. (1989). Hegel’s idealism: The satisfactions of self-consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Renault, E. (2016). Critical theory and processual social ontology. The Journal of Social Ontology (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (2014). The idea of Hegel’s science of logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. (2008). On mechanism in Hegel’s social and political philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. (2015). Hegel’s logical critique of capitalism: The Paradox of dependence and the model of reciprocal mediation. In A. Buchwalter (Ed.), Hegel and capitalism (pp. 163–180). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, D. H. (1985). The metaphysics of the social world. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1996). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2007). Freedom and neurobiology: Reflections on free will, language, and political power. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, R. (2009). Hegelian metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1992). Analysis and metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. J. (2015a). Philosophical foundations for a Marxian ethics. In M. Thompson (Ed.), Constructing Marxist ethics: Critique, normativity, praxis. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. J. (2015b). Capitalism as deficient modernity: Hegel against the modern economy. In A. Buchwalter (Ed.), Hegel and capitalism (pp. 117–132). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. J. (2016). The domestication of critical theory. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunick, M. (1992). Hegel’s political philosophy: Interpreting the practice of legal punishment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, R. D. (1996). Ethical community without communitarianism. Philosophy Today, 40(2), 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans, C. (2012). Freedom and reflection: Hegel and the logic of agency. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, M.J. (2017). Social Ontology and Social Critique: Toward a New Paradigm for Critical Theory. In: Krier, D., Worrell, M. (eds) The Social Ontology of Capitalism. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59952-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics