Skip to main content

Nascent Student Entrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology-Based Nascent Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Entrepreneurial education and extracurricular programmes have been introduced into universities to respond to student demand for such skills along with the increased recognition of the importance of entrepreneurship as a contributor to economic development. This chapter covers firstly student entrepreneurship as a component of university start-ups (highlighting the role that students play in faculty-led start-ups and entrepreneurship as an alternative to employment); secondly, the type of support provided by universities for start-ups through curriculum-based and extracurricular programmes; thirdly, nascent student technology start-ups (both faculty-led and through entrepreneurial programmes). The implications for entrepreneurship educators, programme organisers and course developers, and business school deans, along with recommendations for future research, are examined and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 3M. (2006). 3M acquires developer of 3-D imaging technology for digital dentistry, Brontes Technologies Inc. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from http://news.3m.com/press-release/company/3m-acquires-developer-3-d-imaging-technology-digital-dentistry-brontes-technol.

  • Andersson, S., & Berggren, E. (2016). Born global or local? Factors influencing the internationalization of university spin-offs–—The case of Halmstad University. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10843-016-0182-z.

  • Andersson, S., & Wictor, I. (2003). Innovative internationalisation in new firms: Born globals—The Swedish case. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 249–275. doi:10.1023/a:1024110806241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astebro, T., & Bazzazian, M. (2010). Student start-ups and local economic development. Paper presented at the DRUID conference, Imperial College London Business School, June 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Start-ups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas Devices. (2016). About—Atlas Devices. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from https://atlasdevices.com/home/about/#atlasdevices.

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1–2), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailetti, T. (2011). Fostering student entrepreneurship and university spinoff companies. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, H., Kogler, D. F., & Munro, A. K. (2010). A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9), 519–532. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, E., & Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å. (2009). Creating an entrepreneurial region: Two waves of academic spin-offs from Halmstad University. European Planning Studies, 17(8), 1171–1189. doi:10.1080/09654310902981037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, W. F., De-Haan, U., & Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 661–669. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T. H., Dorf, R. C., & Nelson, A. J. (2011). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A., Patton, D., & Kenney, M. (2016). University technology transfer in China: A literature review and taxonomy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9487-2.

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C. E., & Miller, W. F. (2012). Impact: Stanford University’s economic impact via innovation and entrepreneurship. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2227460.

  • Ensley, M. D., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34(7), 1091–1105. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (2000). Building employability skills into the higher education curriculum: A university-wide initiative. Education + Training, 42(2), 75–83. doi:10.1108/00400910010331620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A. (2013). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(7–8), 692–701. doi:10.1080/08985626.2013.821318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gately, C., & Cunningham, J. (2014). The contributions and disconnections between writing a business plan and the start-up process for incubator technology entrepreneurs. In A. C. Corbett, D. S. Siegel, & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 16, pp. 197–241). Bingley, Bradford: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (2014). Creating university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems: Evidence from emerging world leaders. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from http://www.rhgraham.org/RHG/Recent_publications_files/MIT%3ASkoltech%20entrepreneurial%20ecosystems%20report%202014%20_1.pdf.

  • Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: Emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4.

  • Hayter, C. S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2016). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9470-y.

  • HMS. (2016). The world’s no. 1 choice for industrial communication. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from https://www.hms-networks.com/about.

  • Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00081-2.

  • Houser, C. (2014, 8 September 2016). Why the university is the ideal start-up platform? Wired.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulsey, L., Rosenberg, L., & Kim, B. (2006). Seeding entrepreneurship across campus: Early implementation experiences of the Kauffman Campuses Initiative. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.981057.

  • Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. The American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Matlay, H., & Maritz, A. (2012). Enterprise education: For all, or just some? Education + Training, 54(8/9), 813–824. doi:10.1108/00400911211274909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 283–300. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00098-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. (2008). Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy—Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28(5), 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Cummings, B., & Nichols, S. P. (2008). From bureaucratic tech transfer to entrepreneurial tech commercialization. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1288942.

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 29(5), 577–597. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x.

  • Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å., & Berggren, E. (2010). Linking innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: A study of Swedish schools of entrepreneurship. In R. Oakey, G. Cook, A. Groen, & P. van der Sijde (Eds.), New technology based firms in the new millenium: Funding: An enduring problem (pp. 35–50). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lubynsky, R. (2013). From lab bench to innovation: Critical challenges to nascent academic entrepreneurs. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2259257.

  • Lundqvist, M. A., & Williams Middleton, K. L. (2013). Academic entrepreneurship revisited—University scientists and venture creation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20(3), 603–617. doi:10.1108/JSBED-04-2013-0059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT Deshpande Center. (2016a). About. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from https://deshpande.mit.edu/about.

  • MIT Deshpande Center. (2016b). Brontes Technologies, Inc. (3M). Retrieved September 8, 2016, from https://deshpande.mit.edu/portfolio/project/brontes-technologies-inc-3m.

  • MIT Venture Mentoring Service. (2016). About. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from http://vms.mit.edu/about.

  • Morris, M. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2014). Building university 21st century entrepreneurship programs that empower and transform. In S. Hoskinson & D. F. Kuratko (Eds.), Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21st century (Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth) (Vol. 24, pp. 1–24). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Cornwall, J. R. (2013). Entrepreneurship programs and the modern university. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. J., & Byers, T. (2013). Challenges in university technology transfer and the promising role of entrepreneurship education. Kauffman: Emerging Scholars Initiatives. Retrieved from SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1651224.

  • Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, U. (2015). Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2), 198–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, A., Ballou, J., DesRoches, D., Potter, F., Zhao, Z., & Reedy, E. (2009). An overview of the Kauffman Firm Survey: Results from the 2004-2007 data. Available at SSRN 1392292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2011). Entrepreneurial impact: The role of MIT—An updated report. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 7(1–2), 1–149. doi:10.1561/0300000030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sam, C., & van der Sijde, P. (2014). Understanding the concept of the entrepreneurial university from the perspective of higher education models. Higher Education, 68(6), 891–908. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9750-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. doi:10.2307/259121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., & Pahnke, E. (2014). Parting the ivory curtain: Understanding how universities support a diverse set of start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 780–792. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9336-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieger, P., Fueglistaller, U., & Zellweger, T. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions and activities of students across the world. International Report of the GUESSS Project 2011. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Swiss Research Institute of Small Business and Entrepreneurship at the University of St. Gallen (KMU-HSG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. T., Weaver, K. M., & Fernald, L. W. (1994). A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy. Simulation & Gaming, 25(3), 338–352. doi:10.1177/1046878194253003.

  • Thurik, A., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8–9), 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities socioeconomic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self-employment intentions of business students: A cross-level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 175–200. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00460.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regina Maniam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maniam, R., Everett, A.M. (2017). Nascent Student Entrepreneurship. In: Cunningham, J., O'Kane, C. (eds) Technology-Based Nascent Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59594-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59594-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59593-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59594-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics