Skip to main content

The Ma of Maeterlinck and Ma of Japanese Maeterlinckians

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ma Theory and the Creative Management of Innovation
  • 545 Accesses

Abstract

These characteristics are commonly observed in Japanese traditional performing arts, and have been considered an important aspect of performance up until the present day. One wonders, however, whether they are uniquely Japanese. In this chapter, the author will attempt to answer this question by comparing the work of Maurice Maeterlinck (1862–1949), a symbolist writer whom the author has been researching for many years, with plays written by Japanese writers who were influenced by Maeterlinck at the time they wrote their works. As a place where living human beings perform in the flesh in front of a live audience, the theater presents a world of fiction and fantasy using drama as a medium but at the same time always conveys a sense of the here-and-now, no matter how many years previous the drama was written.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Maurice Maeterlinck, Théâtre complet, presenté par Martine de Rougemont, Slatkin, Collection Ressources, Paris, Genève, p. 1.

  2. 2.

    In the same way as followers of Richard Wagner are referred to as Wagnerians, the followers of Maeterlinck are referred to as Maeterlinckians.

  3. 3.

    “ Countless things are telling us that such an era is approaching. Perhaps such an era shall arrive soon. An era when our souls can directly understand each other without relying on our senses.” (Maurice Maeterlinck, Go Yamazaki, The Treasure of the Humble, Hirakawa edition, Tokyo, p. 18)

  4. 4.

    Mood drama, emotional drama, symbolist drama, while nuances are slightly different and overlap, have been used in the history of contemporary plays. At that time, Maeterlinckian one-act plays were referred to as “mood dramas” or “emotional dramas.”

  5. 5.

    Op.cit., 3.

References

  • Anazawa, M. (1996). Quatre éléments dans le théâtre symbolique de Maeterlinck, Mémoire de D.E.A. présenté à l’Universite de Paris III.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujiwara, S. (2005). Interval: Fundamental Thinking in Japanese Culture (in Japanese). Nihon University College of Art, Summary, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawatake, T. (1978). An Introduction to Theater (in Japanese). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeterlinck, M. (1995). The Treasure of the Humble (in Japanese). Tokyo: Hirakawa Shuppan Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeterlinck, M. (2002). Carnets de travail (1881–1890). Edition établie et annotée par.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten, M., and Van de Kerckhove, F. (2011). Le monde dans Maeterlinck, Maeterlinck dans le monde, Textyles N. 41 (Textyles-éditions). Bruxelles: Le cri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozasa, Y. (1985). The History of Japanese Modern Theater (Meiji, Taisho editions) (in Japanese). Tokyo: Hakusuisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, J., Borie, M., & de Rougemont, M. (1986). Esthétique théâtrale. Paris: Société d’édition d’eneseignement supérieur.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anazawa, M. (2017). The Ma of Maeterlinck and Ma of Japanese Maeterlinckians. In: Kodama, M. (eds) Ma Theory and the Creative Management of Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59194-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59194-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59354-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59194-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics