Skip to main content

Smiling or Smiting?—Selves, States and Stories in the Constitution of Polities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Storytelling

Abstract

This chapter investigates storytelling’s role in political narrative. It takes a long-term perspective, where “political narrative” does not refer to coverage of the politics of the day, but rather to stories about the foundation of “our” polity and its heroes. The chapter argues that the cultural or group identity-forming role of narrative is not secondary to economics or politics but, on the contrary, that storytelling is primary, constituting the polity. It identifies the evolution of two kinds of story: personal or “smiling” narratives for selves; and power or “smiting” stories for states. The question for the digital storytelling movement—potentially the most democratic mode of narration—is whether it can call new kinds of polity into being without using “state” narratives based on violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, M. (1988). Rich: The life of Richard Burton. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, Q. (2013). Boyer lectures. ABC Radio National. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/boyerlectures/2013-boyer-lectures/5486344.

  • Burton, R., & Burton, S. (1991). A Christmas story. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. ISBN 0-393-03034-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1149–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (2008). Boundaries and bridges: Digital storytelling in education studies and media studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media (pp. 61–84). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dush, L. (2013). The ethical complexities of sponsored digital storytelling. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(6), 627–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2012). Human evolution: A behavioral synthesis. New Mexico: Santa Fe Institute. Retrieved from http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/~bowles/HumanEvolution.pdf.

  • Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Harvill Secker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, P., & Sumner, T. (2014). Cultivating compassion: How digital storytelling is transforming healthcare. Chichester: Kingsham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1992). The politics of pictures: The creation of the public in the age of popular media. New York: Routldge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2015). Stories tell us? Political narrative, demes, and the transmission of knowledge through culture. Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & Potts, J. (2014). Cultural science: A natural history of stories, demes, knowledge and innovation. London: Bloomsbury. Accessible (CC license) at Bloomsbury Collections. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/cultural-science-a-natural-history-of-stories-demes-knowledge-and-innovation/.

  • Ibbotson, P., & Tomasello, M. (2015). The roots of language: What makes us different from other animals? The Guardian, 6 November: https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2015/nov/05/roots-language-what-makes-us-different-animals.

  • Jenkins, T. (2015). Digital words of wisdom? Digital storytelling with older people. Cultural Science Journal, 8(2), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2008). Digital storytelling, mediatized stories: Self-representations in new media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malešević, S., & Ryan, K. (2013). The disfigured ontology of figurational sociology: Norbert Elias and the question of violence. Critical Sociology, 39(2), 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohler, J. (2013). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity (2nd ed.). Corwin (Sage): Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (2012). Orality and literacy technologizing the word, with additional chapters by John Hartley (30th Anniversary Edition). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. (2012). Wired for culture: The natural history of human cooperation. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podkalicka, A., & Staley, J. (2009). YouthWorx media: Creative media engagement for “at risk” young people. 3CMedia: Journal of Community, Citizen’s and Third Sector Media and Communication, 5, 1–7. Online https://www.cbaa.org.au/article/connecting-through-digital-storytelling.

  • Sconce, J. (2000). Haunted media: Electronic presence from telegraphy to television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondson, H. (2009). Connecting through digital storytelling. 3CMedia: Journal of Community, Citizen’s and Third Sector Media and Communication, 5, 61–73. Online https://www.cbaa.org.au/sites/default/files/3CMedia-Issue5-October%202009-Simmondson.pdf.

  • Şimşek, B. (2015). Introduction: Tomorrow’s stories to be left. Culture Science Journal, 8(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., & Hagood, M. (2008). Developing literate identities with English language learners through digital storytelling. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 12–38. Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/skinner_hagood/article.pdf.

  • Spurgeon, C., & Burgess, J. (2015). Making media participatory. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge companion to alternative and community media, Chap. 35. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumim, N. (2012). Self representation and digital culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (2015). Ultrasociety: How 10,000 years of war made humans the greatest cooperators on Earth. Online: Beresta Books. http://peterturchin.com/blog/2015/11/21/ultrasociety-how-10000-years-of-war-made-humans-the-greatest-cooperators-on-earth/.

  • Turchin, P., Currie, T., Turner E., & Gavrilets, S. (2013). War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies. PNAS, 110(41), 16384–16389. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/110/41/16384.full.pdf.

  • Vivienne, S. (2015). Digital identity and everyday activism: Sharing private stories with networked publics. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, N., Spurgeon, C., Rennie, E., Klaebe, H., Heck, E., Haseman, B. et al. (2015). Community uses of co-creative media digital storytelling and co-creative media: The role of community arts and media in propagating and coordinating population-wide creative practice. Cultural Science Journal, 8(2), 150–243. Online http://cultural-science.org/journal/index.php/culturalscience/article/view/121.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hartley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hartley, J. (2017). Smiling or Smiting?—Selves, States and Stories in the Constitution of Polities. In: Dunford, M., Jenkins, T. (eds) Digital Storytelling . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59152-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics