Skip to main content

Women Workers, Collective Action and the “Right to Work” in Madhya Pradesh

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Movements and the State in India

Part of the book series: Rethinking International Development series ((RID))

Abstract

The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act enacted by the Indian Parliament in 2005, created a legal, justiciable “right to work” for all households in rural India and effected the implementation of the largest public works programme of its kind in the world. Adult members of all rural households were now legally entitled to “demand” work on publicly funded worksites, for “at least” 100 days per household per financial year. The enactment of the NREGA was significant, since this was the first Parliamentary statute that introduced a framework of universal, justiciable rights for the implementation of a “developmental” or poverty-alleviation program in post-independence India. This chapter discusses the significance of the NREGA for women workers. It also looks at the potential and limitations of collective action in enabling women workers to access their rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). ‘Bargaining’ and gender relations within and beyond their household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahuguna, V. (1990). The Chipko Movement. In I. Sen (ed.), A Space Within the Struggle. New Delhi. Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, A. (1997). Tribal politics and discourses of environmentalism. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 31(2), 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, A. (2004). In the belly of the river: Tribal Conflicts over development in the Narmada valley (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxi, U. (1998). Voices of suffering and the future of human rights. Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 8, 125–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, B. (2005). The Naxalite movement in central Bihar. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(15), 1536–1549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., & Sudarshan, R. (2011). Issues in labour market inequality and women’s participation in India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme (Working Paper 98). Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. (1990). Famine prevention in India. In J. Drèze & A. Sen (Eds.), The political economy of hunger: Famine prevention (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., & Khera, R. (2011). The battle for employment guarantee. In R. Khera (Ed.), The battle for employment guarantee. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. (2010). The Naxalite/Maoist movement in India: A review of recent literature (Working Paper No. 109), Institute of South Asian Studies Working Paper Series. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (Ed.) (2004). Inclusive citizenship: Meanings and expressions. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, R., & Crossman, B. (1996). Subversive sites: Feminist engagement with law in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar, G., & Gala, C. (1990). The Bodhgaya land struggle. In I. Sen (Ed.), A space within the struggle. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khera, R. (2013). Democratic politics and legal rights: Employment guarantee and food security in India (Working Paper No. 327). New Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khera, R., & Nayak, N. (2009). Women workers and perceptions of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(43), 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunnath, G. (2006). Becoming a Naxalite in rural Bihar: Class struggle and its contradictions. Journal of Peasant Studies, 33(1), 89–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, N. (2004). Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Rural Development (2015). NREGA report to the people. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, S. (2008). Employment guarantee, women’s work and childcare. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(9), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. (forthcoming). ‘Workers’ or ‘Beneficiaries’: The varied politics of NREGA implementation in South-West Madhya Pradesh. in R. Nagaraj and Sripad Motiram (eds.). Political Economy of Contemporary India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. (2012). Flexing legal texts: The politics of claiming a right to work. Unpublished PhD thesis, SOAS, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. (1990). The Kerala fishworkers struggle. In I. Sen (Ed.), A space within the struggle. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, N. (2008). Songs of hope. The Hindu Sunday Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. B. (2014). Women’s participation in the Singur movement, West Bengal. In K. B. Nielsen & A. Waldrop (Eds.), Women, gender and everyday social transformation in India. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, A. G. (2010). Dispossession and resistance in India: The river and the rage. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, A. G. (2012). Adivasis in and against the state: Subaltern politics and state power in contemporary India. Critical Asian Studies, 44(2), 251–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahul (1998). Bhil women of Nimad: Growing assertion. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(9), 445–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R., & Korteweg, A. C. (1999). Women’s movements in the third world: Identity, mobilization, and autonomy. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparelia, S. (2013). A progressive juristocracy? The unexpected social activism of India’s Supreme Court (Working Paper No. 391). Notre Dame, IN: Kellogg Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainath, P. (2007). NREGP: No place for single women. The Hindu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar, R. (2010). Emergence of the political subject. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization and emancipation (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths LexisNexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, I. (Ed.) (1990). A space within the struggle. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, M. (2008). Radicalism of NREGA [Letter to the Editor]. Economic and Political Weekly, 43/23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, S. (1996). Common property, community and collective action: Social movements and sustainable development in India. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Political Science, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilisation to revolution. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2015). The state of social safety nets. New York: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nayak, N. (2016). Women Workers, Collective Action and the “Right to Work” in Madhya Pradesh. In: Nielsen, K., Nilsen, A. (eds) Social Movements and the State in India. Rethinking International Development series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59133-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics