Skip to main content

Strengthening the Determinants of the Local Government Capacities for the Successful PPP Implementation in the Western Balkans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Local Regulation

Abstract

The chapter focuses on the analysis of the determinants of the public-private partnerships (PPP) institutional framework, with a particular attention to function, roles, and activities of PPP units in general and in the Western Balkans in particular. The main hypothesis is that the central PPP unit’s ability to deliver its ‘services’ stipulated by national laws is directly related to the organisation and capacity of the local level entity/authorities to receive such an impact, as well as to give proper reaction in terms of the implementation of the PPP project. This relates not only to project preparation, but also to service delivery, and it refers to both the functional and organisational capacity of local governments to transpose national economic development plans into local development strategies. Clear allocation of resources and identification of roles and responsibilities between the central and local levels are needed to boost economic growth and competitiveness in relatively weak Western Balkans economies. Due to the fact that central budget and extra-budgetary funds are not sufficient sources of capital investment financing, local governments have to be prepared to serve as facilitators of capital investments at the local level. This does not necessarily mean increasing the size or the complexity of the organisation, but rather making the necessary adjustments to existing processes and upgrading the role of local authorities in project design, negotiation and monitoring of service delivery. Based on comparative experiences from selected developed countries, our analysis is focused on the countries of the Western Balkans region, where PPP implementation is in its embryonic stage: Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Albania, and FYR Macedonia. Each of those countries has introduced PPP legislation and created central PPP units. We argue that strengthening the role of local administration and creating functional relationships between the central and local levels, as well as the local level and the stakeholders, would contribute to the successful implementation of investments at the local level and regional development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becchis, F., Vanin E., & Russolillo, D. (2013). FIELD: A methodology for the analysis of local actors, incentives and information endowment in regulation of local public services. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Conference Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Brussels, 22 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes publicness and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31, 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P. J. (1986). Structural analysis of organiyational fields: A blockmodel approach. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 335–370). Greenwhich: JAI Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S. (1991). Yugoslavia: The case of self-managing market socialism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPEC – European Investment Bank. (2014a). Overview of the PPP legal and institutional frameworks in the Western Balkans. http://www.eib.org/epec/resources/publications/epec_wbif_overview_ppp_institutional_arrangements_institutional_frameworks. Accessed July 2015.

  • EPEC – European Investment Bank. (2014b). Establishing and reforming PPP units. Analysis of EPEC member PPP units and lessons learnt. http://www.eib.org/epec/resources/publications/epec_establishing_and_reforming_ppp_units_en.pdf. Accessed July 2015.

  • Fischer, K., Jungbecker, A., & Alfen, H. W. (2006). The emergence of PPP Task Forces and their influence on project delivery in Germany. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freilich, R. (1985). Public private partnerships in large-scale development projects. In: B. Weiss (Ed.), Public-private partnerships: Financing a common wealth. Washington, DC: Government Finance Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., & Shleifer, A. (1998). Private enforcement of public laws: A theory of legal reform. Government in Transition, 88(2), 398–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (2011). Theorizing public-private partnership success. Paper for the public management research conference, Syracuse University, 2–4 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jooste, S. F., & Scott, W. R. (2009). Organizations enabling public private partnerships: An organization field approach, collaboratory for research on global projects, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jooste, S. F., Levitt, R., & Scott, D. (2011). Beyond ‘one size fits all’: How local conditions shape PPP-enabling field development. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 1(1), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanic, T., & Sredojevic, S. (2014). Institutional framework as the key catalyzer for the public-private partnership projects and concessionsThe case of Serbia. Paper presented at the 22nd NISPAcee Annual Conference, Government vs. Governance in Central and Eastern Europe. From Pre-Weberianism to Neo-Weberianism? 22–24 May, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Complexity theory and public administration, what’s new? Public Management Review, 10(3), 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., & Buser, M. (2006). Emerging metagovernance as an institutional framework for public private partnership networks in Denmark. International Journal of Project management, 24, 548–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. (2005). Regulation and development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Municipal Affairs of the British Columbia. (1999). Public private partnershipA guide for local government.Victoria: Ministry of Municipal Affairs of the British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, S. P. (2002). Public-private partnerships and state and local economic development – Leveraging private investment. Reviews of Economic Development Literature and Practice, No. 16, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Péteri, G. (2003). Organizing public services at the local level. Paper presented at the Workshop Public Services on the Local and Regional Level, Budapest, 17–18 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. R., & Rodrigues, H. (2005). Competitiveness and public-private partnerships: Towards a more decentralised policy. FEP Working Papers No. 171, Porto, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sredojevic, S. (2010). Javno-privatno partnerstvo (eng. Public-Private Partnership). Belgrade: Arhipelag and Institute of Economic Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2005). Guidelines on governance in public-private partnerships for infrastructure development. Draft, http://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ie/Wp5/docs/guidelines.pdf

  • Van den Hurk, M., Brogaard, L., Lember, V., Petersen, O.H., & Witz, P. (2015). National varieties of public-private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of PPP-supporting units in 19 European countries). Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(01), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Carbonara, N., Lember, V., Petersen, H.O., Sherer, W., & Hurk, M. V. D. (2013). Public private partnerships in transport: Trends and theory. P3T3, Discussion Papers part I, COST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Petersen, O.H., Scherrer, W., & Soecipto, R. M. (2014). Policy commitment, legal and regulatory framework and institutional support for PPP in international comparison: Indexing countries’ readiness for taking up PPP. University of Salyburg, Working Papers in Economics and Finance, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, N., & Jacobs, B. (1998). Public-private partnerships for local economic development. Wesport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and PPIAF. (2015). Washington, DC: PPI Project Database. http://ppi.worldbank.org. Accessed 3 July 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jovanic, T., Sredojevic, S. (2017). Strengthening the Determinants of the Local Government Capacities for the Successful PPP Implementation in the Western Balkans. In: Asquer, A., Becchis, F., Russolillo, D. (eds) The Political Economy of Local Regulation. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58828-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics