Skip to main content

Who Cares? The Unintended Consequences of Policy for Migrant Families

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Women and Migration in the Global South
  • 729 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on care and caregiving to examine the unintended consequences of policy for both settlement and transnational family relations. Migration—and even refugee policy—is rarely designed around care practices and needs. Yet, care and caregiving are often key drivers of mobility—increasingly visible in the ‘care-chains’ of the ‘global south’, but largely invisible in the temporary forms of mobility characteristic of the ‘global north’. When care is a central motivation for mobility women are the major actors involved, and hence the dramatic feminisation of migration, including domestic workers, middling migrants and flying grandmothers. A focus on the portability of care offers a fresh perspective on the more prominent political, economic and legal migration agendas, extending our assessment of migrant precarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ariza, M. (2014). Care circulation, absence and affect in transnational families. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 94–114). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Future population and aging. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features10March%202009

  • Australian Government. (2015). Intergenerational report: Australia in 2055. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.au/PublicationsAndMedia/Publications/2015/2015-Intergenerational-Report/HTML

  • Baldassar, L. (2011). Italian migrants in Australia and their relationship to Italy: Return visits, transnational caregiving and the second generation. Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 20(2), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2016a). De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks, 16(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2016b). Mobilities and communication technologies: Transforming care in family life. In M. Kilkey & E. Palenga-Moolenbeck (Eds.), Family life in an age of migration and mobility: Global perspectives through the life course. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. (2017). Transformations in transnational aged care: The case of Italians in Australia. In P. Dossa & C. Coe (Eds.), Transnational aging and kin-work. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L., Baldock, C. V., & Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders: Migration, ageing, and transnational caregiving. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, L. G., Schiller, N. G., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. St. Louis: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2014). Romania and Bulgaria EU migration restrictions lifted. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25565302

  • Boehm, D. A. (2012). Intimate migrations: Gender, family, and illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brijnath, B. (2009). Familial bonds and boarding passes: Understanding caregiving in a transnational context. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 16(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callister, P., Didham, R., & Badkar, J. (2014). Ageing New Zealand: The growing reliance on migrant caregivers, a 2014 update. Working paper. Retrieved from http://callister.co.nz/aged-care-workers-nz-2014.pdf

  • Callister, P., Tortell, L., & Williams, J. (2009). Paid domestic work: A private matter or a public policy issue? Insitute of Policy Studies working paper 09/02. Retrieved from http://ips.ac.nz/publications/files/ad978dc03e0.pdf

  • Caspersz, D. (2014). Conceptualising work and belonging of temporary labour migrants in Australia. Mobilities & belonging across the lifecourse. Paper presented at the mobilities and belonging symposium, 3–4 November, UWA, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2002). Migration and community formation under conditions of globalization. International Migration Review, 36(4), 1143–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomik, R., & MacLennan, M. (2014). Aged care in Australia: Part I – Policy, demand and funding. CEPAR research brief 2014/01. Retrieved from http://www.cepar.edu.au/media/133377/aged_care_in_australia_-_part_i_-_resupply__v3_proof.pdf

  • Clifford, S. A. (2009). The effects of fly-in/fly-out commute arrangements and extended working hours on the stress, lifestyle, relationships and health characteristics of Western Australian mining employees and their partners. (Ph.D.), University of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2013). Asylum trends Australia; 2012–13 (Annual publication). Retrieved from https://www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/statistics/asylum-trends-aus-2012-13.pdf

  • DW. (2014). EU opens doors to Romanian and Bulgarian workers. Retrieved from http://www.dw.com/en/eu-opens-doors-to-romanian-and-bulgarian-workers/a-17335948

  • Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2003). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Favell, A., Feldblum, M., & Smith, M. P. (2007). The human face of global mobility: A research agenda. Society, 44(2), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London/New York: Tavistock/Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. D., & Mitchell, A. (2007). Immigration and the aged care workforce in Australia: Meeting the deficit. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 26(4), 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Towards a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, L. (2005). Picking winners: The recent transformation of Australia’s skilled migration policy. International Migration Review, 39(3), 663–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2003). Love and gold. In B. Ehrenreich & A. R. Hochschild (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (1st ed., pp. 15–30). New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (2005). Love and gold. In L. Ricciutelli, A. R. Miles, & M. McFadden (Eds.), Feminist politics, activism and vision: Local and global challenges (pp. 34–46). Toronto, Canada/London/New York: Inanna Publications and Education; Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2006). Love lives at a distance: Distance relationships over the lifecourse. Sociological Research Online, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/holmes.html

  • Howe, A. L. (2009). Migrant care workers or migrants working in long-term care? A review of Australian experience. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(4), 374–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S. (2003). Kinning: The creation of life trajectories in transnational adoptive families. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., Thang, L. L., & Toyota, M. (2012). Transnational mobilities for care: Rethinking the dynamics of care in Asia. Global Networks, 12(2), 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. (2003). Circular migration: Keeping development rolling? Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/circular-migration-keeping-development-rolling/

  • Hugo, G. (2007). Contextualising the ‘crisis in aged care’ in Australia: A demographic perspective. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. (2009a). Best practice in temporary labour migration for development: A perspective from Asia and the Pacific. International Migration, 47(5), 23–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, G. (2009b). Care worker migration, Australia and development. Population, Space and Place, 15(2), 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, L. W., Devi, S. U., & Hochschild, A. R. (2008). Global care crisis: A problem of capital, care chain, or commons? American Behavioral Scientist, 52(3), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, S.-E. (2012). Ethnic disparities in social and economic well-being of the immigrant aged in Australia. Journal of Population Research, 29(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone, S., Stevens, D., & Baldassar, L. (2014). Refugee protection and the role of law: Conflicting identities. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E., & Raghuram, P. (2009). Skilled female labour migration. Focus migration policy brief no.13. Retrieved from http://focus-migration.hwwi.de/typo3_upload/groups/3/focus_Migration_Publikationen/Kurzdossiers/PB_13_skilled_fem_l_m.pdf

  • Lutz, H., & Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. (2012). Care workers, care drain, and care chains: Reflections on care, migration, and citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(1), 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pe-Pua, R., Mitchell, C., Castles, S., & Iredale, R. (1998). Astronaut families and parachute children: Hong Kong immigrants in Australia. In E. Sinn (Ed.), The last half century of Chinese overseas (pp. 279–298). Aberdeen, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, HKU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavi, S. (2011). Rethinking care in a development context: An introduction. Development and Change, 42(4), 873–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. D. (2013). What kinship is – And is not. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salami, B., Nelson, S., Hall, L. M., Muntaner, C., & Hawthorne, L. (2014). Workforce integration of Philippine-educated nurses who migrate to Canada through the Live-in Caregiver Program. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 46(4), 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schier, M. (2015). Post-separation families: Spatial mobilities and the need to manage multi-local everyday life. In Spatial mobility, migration, and living arrangements (pp. 205–224). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, S. (2003). The place of care the relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory, 4(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souralová, A. (2015). New perspectives on mutual dependency in care-giving. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed, J. (2008). Employment prospects for skilled migrants: A relational perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 18(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (2005). Care as the work of citizens: A modest proposal. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Women and citizenship (pp. 130–145). Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. (2011). A feminist democratic ethics of care and global care workers. Citizenship and responsibility. In R. Mahon & F. Robinson (Eds.), Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care (pp. 162–177). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Summit of Information Society (WSIS). (2003). Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/net/wsis/index.html

  • Yeates, N. (2012). Global care chains: A-state-of-the-art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. Global Networks, 12(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loretta Baldassar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baldassar, L. (2017). Who Cares? The Unintended Consequences of Policy for Migrant Families. In: Tittensor, D., Mansouri, F. (eds) The Politics of Women and Migration in the Global South. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58799-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics