Skip to main content

Part of the book series: History of British Women’s Writing ((HBWW))

  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

Friendship offered Victorian men and women much more than interpersonal intimacy. As a rallying cry (‘Come, my friends/ ‘Tis not too late to seek a newer world’) or as a refuge from danger (‘there is no friend like a sister’), it provided practical, micro-solutions to many larger public problems. 1 As recent scholarship has demonstrated, friendship had social, economic, and political stakes: it was a practice ground for companionate marriage, an alternative to family or professional care, and the basis for both democracy and social activism.2 If men could secure such relationships through school, clubs, and professional associations, these friendships had particular significance for women, who had fewer institutional occasions to develop networks and alliances, and for whom they frequently took the place of more formal coalitions. The close friendships that Sharon Marcus has found to be ‘pervasive’ in the life writing of middle-class women fit comfortably within the norms of domestic ideology; considered ‘essential to proper femininity’, they appeared compatible with conventional, heteronormative family life. Yet they also challenged these conventions by providing alternative forms of connection and agency, enabling women ‘to exercise powers of choice and expression’.3 Though individual pleasure might motivate and reward close female ties, those ties could also be strategic, empowering, and efficacious.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Alfred Lord Tennyson, ‘Ulysses’ (1833), in Victorian Literature 1830–1900, ed. by Dorothy Mermin and Herbert F. Tucker (Philadelphia: Harcourt College Publishers, 2002), pp. 399–400, 11. 56–57

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christina Rossetti, ‘Goblin Market’ (1862), in Victorian Literature 1830–1900, pp. 846–52, 1. 562.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For the perception of female friendships as instrumental to heterosexual marriages, see Sharon Marcus, Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007), especially pp. 79, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  4. On working-class neighbourhood networks, see Ellen Ross, Love and Toil: Motherhood in Outcast London, 1870–1918 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 116, 178.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For the relationship of friendship to democracy, Richard Dellamora, Friendship’s Bonds: Democracy and the Novel in Victorian England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 21–3 and passim;

    Google Scholar 

  6. for female alliances and social activism, see Jill Rappoport, Giving Women: Alliance and Exchange in Victorian Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), passim and chapters 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mary Lyndon Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For example, David Skilton, ‘“Depth of Portraiture”: What Should Distinguish a Victorian Man from a Victorian Woman?’ rpt. in The Politics of Gender in Anthony Trollope’s Novels: New Readings for the Twenty-First Century, ed. by Margaret Markwick, Deborah Denenholz Morse, and Regenia Gagnier (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2009), p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  9. As Talia Schaffer notes, despite the fact that female characters in nineteenth-century novels work, ‘good work is both desperately wanted and extremely difficult to find [...]. Women are made to crave professional work from which they are perpetually thwarted’ (p. 18); see ‘Why You Can’t Forgive Her: Vocational Women and the Suppressive Hypothesis’, Victorians: A Journal of Culture and Literature, 128 (Fall 2015), 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Augusta Webster (1837–94), ‘A Castaway’, in Victorian Literature 1830–1900, pp. 938–45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alfred, Lord Tennyson, In Memoriam, A. H. H. (1850), ed. by Erik Gray (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 2004), §56, 1. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For the fraught friendships and rivalries of sisters in particular, see Helena Michie, Sororophobia: Differences among Women in Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 33–37 and passim

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. as well as Mary Ann O’Farrell, ‘Sister Acts’, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 34:3/4 (Fall-Winter, 2006), 154–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. George Eliot, Middlemarch, ed. by Rosemary Ashton (1871; London: Penguin Books, 1994), pp. 112 and 113 respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For Gaskell’s navigation of married women’s property law in her purchase of a home, see Mary Elizabeth Leighton and Lisa Surridge, ‘Evolutionary Discourse and the Credit Economy in Elizabeth Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters’, Victorian Literature and Culture, 41:3 (2013), 487–501 (pp. 489–90).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winifred Hughes, ‘Cousin Phillis, Wives and Daughters, and Modernity’, in The Cambridge Companion to Elizabeth Gaskell, ed. by Jill L. Matus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 90–107, 98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jennifer Panek, ‘Constructions of Masculinity in Adam Bede and Wives and Daughters’, Victorian Review: The Journal of the Victorian Studies Association of Western Canada and the Victorian Studies Association of Ontario, 22:2 (Winter 1996), 127–51 (p. 128).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Elizabeth Gaskell, Wives and Daughters, ed. by Pam Morris (1866; London: Penguin Books, 2003), pp. 320 and 393 respectively. All further references in parentheses in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Mary Jean Corbett, Family Likeness: Sex, Marriage, and Incest from Jane Austen to Virginia Woolf(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anna Unsworth, ‘Some Social Themes in Wives and Daughters, I: Education, Science, and Heredity’, Gaskell Society Journal, 4 (1990), 40–51 (p. 45).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish, Siblings without Rivalry: How to Help Your Children Live Together So You Can Live Too (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anne DeWitt, ‘Moral Uses, Narrative Effects: Natural History in Victorian Periodicals and Elizabeth Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters’, Victorian Periodicals Review, 43:1 (Spring 2010), pp. 1–18, 3; see also Leighton and Surridge, Evolutionary Discourse, p. 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karen Boiko, ‘Reading and (Re)Writing Class: Elizabeth Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters’, Victorian Literature and Culture 33:1 (2005), pp. 85–106, 94; also DeWitt, ‘Moral Uses’, p. 11; Lisieux Huelman, ‘The (Feminist) Epistemology of the Nineteenth-Century Periodical Press: Professional Men in Elizabeth Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters’, Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 5:2 (2009), 35 paragraphs. Electronic publication,.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mary Debrabant, ‘Birds, Bees and Darwinian Survival Strategies in Wives and Daughters’, Gaskell Society Journal, 16 (2002), pp. 14–29 (p. 17)

    Google Scholar 

  25. also Phoebe Poon, ‘Popular Evolutionism: Scientific, Legal and Literary Discourse in Gaskell’s Wives and Daughters’, in Elizabeth Gaskell: Victorian Culture and the Art of Fiction: Original Essays for the Bicentenary, ed. by Sandro Jung (Lebanon, NH: Academia, 2010), pp. 195–213, 196, 199, 202

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jim Endersby, ‘Sympathetic Science: Charles Darwin, Joseph Hooker, and the Passions of Victorian Naturalists’, Victorian Studies, 51:2 (2009), pp. 299–320 (p. 300).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall Sahlins, Stone Age Economics (Chicago: Aldine & Atherton, Inc., 1972), p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See James Najarian, ‘“Mr. Osbourne’s Secret”: Elizabeth Gaskell, Wives and Daughters, and the Gender of Romanticism’, in Romantic Echoes in the Victorian Era, ed. by Andrew Radford and Mark Sandy (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 85–101 (p. 93). For Osborne’s resemblance to his mother and his socialisation to replace a deceased daughter, see Panek, ‘Constructions of Masculinity’, p. 146; for Roger as paternal, see Poon, ‘Popular Evolutionism’, p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rappoport, J. (2018). Friendship and Intimacy. In: Hartley, L. (eds) The History of British Women’s Writing, 1830–1880. History of British Women’s Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58465-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics