Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: The Nordic Model in Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nordic Administrative Reforms

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

Abstract

The Nordic countries have been portrayed as model states when it comes to government reform. This chapter introduces the central theme of the book: Is there a Nordic administrative reform model, and what are the main similarities and differences between the Nordic countries and the rest of Europe? It presents an overview of the main research questions and analytical model as well as the individual chapters of the book. This chapter takes stock of earlier research on public sector reform in Europe and the Nordic countries, introducing central concepts and reform trajectories, identified by New Public Management, New Public Governance, the Neo Weberian State, and post-New Public Management, and discusses reform drivers, the effects of reform, and the impact of administrative traditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, J. 2011. Engaging Public Sector Clients. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, R. 2010. ‘NPM and the Search for Efficiencu’, in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (eds), The ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate, 281–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P. 1990. Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums. Governance 3(2): 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carron, N., C. Dahlstrøm, and V. Lapuente. 2012. No Law Without a State. Journal of Comparative Economics 40(2): 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., and Lægreid P. 2013. Contexts and administrative reforms: a transformative perspective, in C. Pollitt, ed. Context in Public Policy and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid, eds. 2001. New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 2007a. Transcending New Public Management. The Transformation of Public Sector Refroms. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. The Whole of Government Approach to Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Review 67(6): 1059–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 2011a. The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Beyond NPM? Some Development Features. In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, eds. T. Christensen, and P. Lægreid. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Administrative Reforms in Western Democracies. In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, eds. B.G. Peters, and J. Pierre. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and J. Newman (1997). The Managerial State. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, D., S. Jilke, G. Hammerschmid, and S. Van de Walle. 2015. The State and Perceptions of Public Sector Reform in Europe. In The International Handbook of Public Administration and Governance, eds. A. Massey, and K. Miller. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlström, C., B. Peters, and J. Pierre, eds. 2011. Steering from the Centre. Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan, S., and C. Pollitt. 2015. NPM Can Work. An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Management Review 17(9): 1305–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M., and J. Nemec. 2013. Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management 26(1): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler, W., and T. Randma-Liiv. 2015. In Some Central and Eastern European Countries, Some NPM Tools May Sometimes Work: A Reply to Dan and Pollitt’s ‘NPM Can Work’. Public Management Review, Online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., and L. Carrera. 2013. Growing the Productivity of Government Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., and V. Hood. 1994. From Old Public Administration to New Public Management. Public Policy & Management 14(3): 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006a. Digital Era Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, and S. Bastow. 2006b. New Public Management is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ejersbo and Greve 2014. Moderniseringen af den offentlige sektor. 3. udgave. København: Akademinsk Forlag Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss Hansen, H. 2011. NPM in Scandinavia. In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, eds. T. Christensen, and P. Lægreid. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2004. State-building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-first Century. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2013. What is Governance? Governance 26(3): 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 2012. Management-Byråkrati. Malmø: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., V. Stimac, and K. Wegrich. 2014. Management Capacity and Performance in European Public Administration. In The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State, eds. M. Lodge, and K. Wegrich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews, and P. Bezes, eds. 2016. Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, B.W., and J. Alford. 2015. Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society 47(6): 711–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., and B. Rothstein, eds. 2014. Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 1991. A New Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration 69(1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., and R. Dixon. 2015. A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less? Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, B., P. Lægreid, and O.K. Pedersen. 2004. Europeanization and Transnational States. Comparing Nordic Central Governments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, B., and G. Sundstrøm 1999. ‘Between Attonomy and Control: Transforamtion of the Swedish Administrtive Model’, in P.G. Roness and H. Sætren (eds) Change and Continuity in Public sector Organizations. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettle, D.F. 2000. The Global Public Management Revolution: A Repory to the Transformation of Governance. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. 2011. Public Management Reform in Continental Europe. In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management Reform, eds. T. Christensen, and P. Lægreid. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., and T. Randma-Liiv. 2015. Europe Managing the Crisis: The Politics of Fiscal Consolidation. London/New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., E.-H. Klijn, and J.F.M. Koppenjan. 1997. Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.H., and J.F.M. Koppenjan. 2015. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S., and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P 2013. Impact of the Global Financial Crisis That Started in 2008 on Norway: No Fiscal Crises and Cut-back Management (Unpublished Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2015. Christopher Hood, “A Public Management for All Seasons?”. In The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration, eds. S.J. Balla, M. Lodge, and E.C. Page. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P., and O.K. Pedersen, eds. 1994. Forvaltningspolitik i Norden. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 1999. Fra opbygning til ombygning i staten. Organisationsforandringer i tre nordiske lande. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P., and K. Verhoest, eds. 2010. Governance of Public Sector Organizations. Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P., K. Sarapuu, L.H. Rykkja, and T. Randma-Liiv. 2015. New Coordination Challenges in the Welfare State. Public Management Review 17(7): 927–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounghlin, J., and B.G. Peters. 1997. State Traditions, Administrative Reform and Regionalization. In The Political Economy of Regionalism, eds. M. Keating, and J. Loughlin. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1986. How We Talk and How We Act. In Leadership and Organizational Culture, eds. T.J. Segiovanni, and J.E. Corbally. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010b. Value for Money: Public Administration after New Public Management. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Together for Better Public Services. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J.P 2005. Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2008. The Ups and Down of Bureaucratic Organization. American Annals of Political Science 11: 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongaro, E. 2009. Public Management Reform and Modernization. Trajectory of Administrative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S.P. 2009. Debate: Delivering Public Services: Are We Asking the Right Questions? Public Money & Management 29 (1): 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S 2011. Public Governance and Public Services: A ‘Brave New World’ or New Wine in Old Bottles? In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, eds. T. Christensen, and P. Lægreid, 417–430. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M., and B.G. Peters. 2010. Traditions and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. 2011. Institutional Theory in Political Science. 3rd rev. edn. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T.J., and R. Waterman. 1982. In Search of Excellence—Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies. London: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C 2001. Convergence, the Useful Myth? Public Administration 79(4): 933–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2003a. Joined-up Government: A Survey. Political Studies Review 1: 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2003b. The Essential Public Manger. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2013a. Context in Public Policy and Management. The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2013b. What Do We Know about Public Management Reform? Concepts, Models and Some Approximate Guidelines. Paper Supporting a Presentation to the Conference and Workshop. Towards a Comprehensive Reform of Public Governance, Lisbon, January 28–30, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., and S. Dan. 2013. Searching for Impacts in Performance Oriented Management Reforms. Public Performance & Management Review 37(1): 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. 2016. ‘Managerialism Redux’, Financial Accountability & Management, 32 (3): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premfors, R. 1991. The “Swedish Model” and Public Sector Reform. West European Politics 14(3): 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., and H. Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, B. 2012. Federal Management Reform in a World of Contradictions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., and D. Stolle. 2003. Introduction. Social Capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Science 26(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2013. The Nordic Countries: The Next Supermodel? February 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, and P. Lægreid, eds. 2012. Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegrich, K., and V. Stimac. 2014. Coordination Capacity. In The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State, eds. M. Lodge, and K. Wegrich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Carsten Greve

  2. Department of Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Per Lægreid

  3. Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway

    Lise H. Rykkja

Authors
  1. Carsten Greve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Per Lægreid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lise H. Rykkja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Greve .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Carsten Greve

  2. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Per Lægreid

  3. Uni Research Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway

    Lise H. Rykkja

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Greve, C., Lægreid, P., Rykkja, L.H. (2016). Introduction: The Nordic Model in Transition. In: Greve, C., Lægreid, P., Rykkja, L. (eds) Nordic Administrative Reforms. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56363-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation