Abstract
Four aspects of the relationship between Public Administration (PA) and Political Science (PS) are analyzed: the historical configurations of the emergence of PA and PS; their respective disciplinary self-understandings; their intellectual exchange; and the question of whether PS and PA are at the same level of disciplinarity if assessed from a philosophy of science perspective. This chapter concludes that the relationship between PA and PS can be characterized as close, competitive, and based on a division of labor—though their concrete interactions depend to a large extent on specific topics and scholarly fads. There are also important differences in the goals of PA and PS: the former is a multidisciplinary endeavor that focuses on applied research, while the latter aims to advance our theoretical knowledge in terms of basic research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, G. (2006). Emergence of Schools of Public Policy: Reflections by a Founding Dean. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 58–79). Oxford: OUP.
Bauer, M. W. (2005). Damit ist ein Staat zu machen: Verwaltungsstudium in Ostmitteleuropa. Osteuropa, 55, 55–66.
Bauer, M. W. (2008). Der throughput-output-nexus in der empirischen verwaltungswissenschaft. Die Verwaltung, 41, 63–76.
Bauer, M. W. (2015). Die Verwaltungswissenschaft und die Herausforderungen der Denationalisierung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56, 648–671.
Benz, A. (2003). Status und Perspektiven der politikwissenschaftlichen Verwaltungsforschung. Die Verwaltung, 36, 361–388.
Benz, A. (2005). Public administrative science in Germany: Problems and prospects of a composite discipline. Public Administration, 83, 659–668.
Bogumil, J., & Jann, W. (2009). Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaft in Deutschland: Einführung in die Verwaltungswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bogumil, J. (2005). On the relationship between political science and administrative science in Germany. Public Administration, 83, 669–684.
Bohne, E. (2014). Gegenstand, methodische Grundlagen und theoretischer Bezugsrahmen der Verwaltungswissenschaft. Die Verwaltung: Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht und Verwaltungswissenschaften, 47, 159–195.
Bossaert, D., Demmke, C., Nomden, K., Polet, R., & Auer, A. (2001). Civil services in the Europe of fifteen: Trends and new developments. Maastricht: EIPA.
Bunge, M. A. (1998). Social science under debate: A philosophical perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Bunge, M. A. (2003). Philosophical dictionary. Amherst, NY.: Prometheus Books.
Caiden, G. E. (1982). Public administration. Pacific Palisades, CA: Palisades Publishers.
Carrizales, T., & Gaynor, T. S. (2013). Diversity in public administration research: A review of journal publications. Public Administration, 37, 306–330.
Chandler, J. A. (1991). Public administration: A discipline in decline. Teaching Public Administration, 9(2), 39–45.
Chevallier, J. (1994). Science administrative. Paris: PUF.
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Cerkin, R. M. (2009). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Dahl, R. A. (1947). The science of public administration: Three problems. Public Administration Review, 7, 1–11.
Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics-administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68, 81–96.
Ellwein, T. (1982). Verwaltungswissenschaft: Die Herausbildung einer Disziplin. In J. J. Hesse (Ed.), Politikwissenschaft und Verwaltungswissenschaft (pp. 34–54). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Ellwein, T. (1997). Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Staatswissenschaft und Staatspraxis, 8, 5–18.
Ellwein, T. (2001). The history of public administration. In K. König & H. Siedentopf (Eds.), Public administration in Germany (pp. 33–45). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic management of public services organisations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues. London: Routledge.
Goodin, R. E., & Klingemann, H.-D. (1998). Political science: The discipline. In R. E. Goodin & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science (pp. 3–49). Oxford: Oxford University.
Hajnal, G. (2003). Diversity and convergence: A quantitative analysis of European public administration education programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 245–258.
Hajnal, G. (2015a). Illiberal or simply unorthodox? public administration education in hungary: A comparative perspective. Teaching Public Administration.
Hajnal, G. (2015b). Public administration education in Europe: Continuity or reorientation? Teaching Public Administration, 33, 95–114.
Héritier, A. (2016). Rigour versus relevance? Methodological discussions in political science. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 57, 11–26.
Hesse, J. J. (1982). Politikwissenschaft und Verwaltungswissenschaft. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Heyen, E. V. (1982). Geschichte der Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft in Europa: Stand und Probleme der Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Hood, C. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 93–109.
Jann, W. (2003). State, administration and governance in Germany: Competing traditions and dominant narratives. Public Administration, 81, 95–118.
Jann, W. (2009). Policy-Analyse und Verwaltungsforschung: 50 Jahre praktische Fragen und theoretische Antworten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 50, 474–503.
Katznelson, I., & Milner, H. V. (2003). Political science: The state of the discipline. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Kickert, W. (2005). Distinctiveness in the study of public management in Europe: A historical-institutional analysis of France, Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 7, 537–763.
Kickert, W. (2008). The study of public management in Europe and the US: A comparative analysis of national distinctiveness. London: Routledge.
Kickert, W., & Stillman, R. (1999). The modern state and its study: New administrative sciences in a changing Europe and the United States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kickert, W., & Toonen, T. A. J. (2006). Public administration in the Netherlands: Expansion, diversification and consolidation. Public Administration, 84, 969–987.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University.
Kingdom, J. (1986a). Public administration: Defining the discipline. Part 1. Teaching Public Administration, 6, 1–13.
Kingdom, J. (1986b). Public administration: Defining the discipline. Part 2. Teaching Public Administration, 6, 1–21.
König, K. (2003). Verwaltungswissenschaft in der internationalen Entwicklung. Verwaltungsarchiv, 94, 267–318.
König, K. (2007). Verwaltungskulturen und Verwaltungswissenschaften. In K. König & C. Reichard (Eds.), Theoretische Aspekte einer managerialistischen Verwaltungskultur. Speyerer Forschungsberichte 254, (pp. 1–24).
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lee, E. W. (1995). Political science, public administration, and the rise of the American administrative state. Public Administration Review, 55, 538–546.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.
Martin, R. C. (1952). Political science and public administration: A note on the state of the union. American Review of Political Science, 46, 660–676.
Menzel, D. C., & White, J. D. (2011). The state of public administration: Issues, challenges and opportunities. London: Routledge.
Ostrom, V. (2008). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Perry, J. L. (2016). Is public administration vanishing? Public Administration Review, 76, 211–212.
Peters, G. B. (2003). Ties that bind: The link between public administration and political science. Journal of Politics, 65, 641–655.
Pierre, P. (1995). Bureaucracy in the modern state: An introduction to comparative public administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Pollitt, C. (2010). Envisioning public administration as a scholarly field in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70, 292–294.
Popper, K. R. (1974). Scientific reduction and the essential incompleteness of all science. In F. J. Ayala et al. (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology (pp. 259–284). London: Macmillan Education UK.
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (1998). Public administration in The Netherlands. Leiden: University of Leiden.
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). The study of public administration in the United States. Public Administration, 89, 140–155.
Raadschelders, J. C. N., & Kwang-Hoon, L. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from public administration review. 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71, 19–33.
Sager, F., & Rutgers, M. (2014). Prelude to public administration: Essential early german and dutch thinking on administration. Introduction. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 36, 25–30.
Scharpf, F. W. (1973). Verwaltungswissenschaft als Teil der Politikwissenschaft. In F. W. Scharpf (Ed.), Planung als Politischer Prozess: Aufsätze zur Theorie der planenden Demokratie (pp. 9–32). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Schneider, V. (2004). Verwaltungswissenschaft zwischen Pluri—und Transdisziplinarität sowie sozialwissenschaftliche Grundlagen—und Anwendungsorientierung. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaften.
Schneider, V. (2006). Über die Natur der Sozialwissenschaften: Die Perspektive des Wissenschaftsphilosophen Mario Bunge. In H.-G. Soeffner & R. Herbrik (Eds.), Soziologische Revue: Sonderheft 6. Wissenssoziologie (pp. 111–121). München: Oldenbourg.
Schuppert, G. F. (2000). Verwaltungswissenschaft: Verwaltung, Verwaltungsrecht, Verwaltungslehre. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Seibel, W. (1996). Administrative science as reform: German public administration. Public Administration Review, 56, 74–81.
Stillman, R. J. (1990). The peculiar stateless origins of American public administration and the consequences for government today. Public Administration Review, 50, 156–167.
van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2004). Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Crossdisciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.
Vigoda, E. (1999). Public administration: An interdisciplinary critical analysis. Basel, NY: Marcel Dekker.
Wahlke, J. C. (1979). Pre-behavioralism in political science. American Political Science Review, 73, 9–31.
Whicker, M., Olshfski, D., & Strickland, R. (1993). The troublesome cleft: Public administration and political science. Public Administration Review, 53, 531–541.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197–222.
Wright, B. E. (2011). Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of law, management, and political science. Public Administration Review, 71, 96–101.
Wright, B. E. (2015). The science of public administration: Problems, presumptions, progress, and possibilities. Public Administration Review, 75, 795–805.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauer, M.W. (2018). Public Administration and Political Science. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55268-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55269-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)